Austin writes:
That is completely wrong. There were no 2400
baud modems in 1971.
Dataphone modems date from the early 1960s, and as far as I know, they always
supported up to 2400 bps.
So what? Actually, that's now a change of
story...but none the less, there weren't
2400 baud modems in
Laurie writes:
Average versus maximum for whom.
For Web surfers at large. I keep statistics for visitors to my site, and they
correlate well with statistics I have seen for other sites. Right now, 800x600
is the most common resolution.
The 1024 X 768 being the resolution that
has the
Tom writes:
There were not 2400 baud modems in 1971.
The Bell System leased Dataphone modems with speeds up to 2400 bps from the
early 1960s, almost a decade earlier, if my distant memory serves. I found a
reference to Multics systems using such modems, presumably in that decade. So
there
Thanks to all who responded. I found it.Regards, Ron
- Original Message -
From: Les Berkley [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 1:26 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: NikSharpener Pro
On 9/10/01 6:59 AM, Ron Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tom writes:
There were not 2400 baud modems in 1971.
The Bell System leased Dataphone modems with speeds up to 2400
bps from the
early 1960s, almost a decade earlier, if my distant memory
serves.
I do not believe that.
So
there were 2400-bps modems by 1971,
No, you have not shown
Average versus maximum for whom.
For Web surfers at large. I keep statistics for visitors to my
site, and they
correlate well with statistics I have seen for other sites.
Right now, 800x600
is the most common resolution.
I believe that says more about the visitors to YOUR web site, than
Laurie writes:
What you would be licensing or renting in
those cases is the bricklayer's or mechanic's
services (skilled labor) and not the product
(e.g., the house he along with a bunch of other
tradesmen built or repair to your vehicle that
the mechanic made).
So why are the rules for
As I've stated, you just don't know what you're talking about, and arguing
with you is nothing more than a waste of time.
So stop wasting it Austin. Do the killfile thing. We're all getting worried
about your blood pressure.
The reason you aggravate me, and have done so to near everyone on
Austin writes:
I believe that says more about the visitors
to YOUR web site, than it does about any average.
As I've said, my figures agree with figures I've seen from other sites.
Additionally, I get quite a broad cross-section of visitors, from students to
homemakers to office workers to
Austin writes:
I do not believe that.
OK.
No, you have not shown that to be true. Provide
proper substantiation to this claim.
What is proper substantiation?
You want to claim that current modem
technology is only 33k, when in fact,
it is 48/50k.
It is difficult to achieve speeds
Harvey wrote:
Rob Geraghty wrote:
snip Want to bet that it wasn't
any individual musician who chased Napster?
Actually it was a band called Metallica.
And they paid for the WHOLE court case? I'm prepared to be educated here -
if they did pay for the whole thing out of their own money
Anthony Atkielski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Javascript is usually client-side, too, although it can be used on either
side.
Good grief. Just about every ASP file written depends on javascript.
For what it's worth, the code I mentioned IS javascript but it seems
to have been more important to
Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Austin writes:
What's illogical, is any discussion with you.
You'll note that personal attacks are absent from my posts, but I do provide
evidence for my assertions. In contrast, your posts are mostly personal
attacks, but evidence for your assertions is
Rob writes:
For what it's worth, the code I mentioned IS
javascript but it seems to have been more
important to figure out whether I used the right
word ...
The difference between Java and Javascript is enormous, despite the similar
names, so it is important to refer to each correctly.
On Fri, 7 Sep 2001 14:46:46 -0400 Austin Franklin ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
Well, technically, there is no reason that has to match either...it's by
someone's choice (or pure dumb luck) that it does. I've given the two
bit/three state example that holds perfectly true.
I ain't doing this
This evening my LS30 suddenly started behaving very strangely with banding
and all sort of odd effects in the scan. I tired various things but the
upshot is that the SCSI cable wasn't firmly plugged intot he back of the
scanner. So if your Nikon starts suddenly behaving strangely - check your
Title: RE: filmscanners: Vuescan 7.1.1.4 not working with
Mic
Hello Ed, Hello Dean and all of the list,
Thanks Dean for your reply; yes, I can also try to use the
scanner as an USB device although I am pretty sure that it will be
MUCH slow.
Do you know if the scanner as USB connection will work
I believe you are both seriously damaged goods, who deserve each other.
The only problem is, we, the other members of this list, do NOT deserve
either of you.
Excuse me, Arthur? No one deserves YOU! There was no cause for your insult
and your comments are absolutely inappropriate and are
Anthony Atkielski wrote:
Nobody provided any documentation proving
any peculiar risk to buying or developing film abroad.
I encourage children to ask questions when they need further information
or are being inquisitive. However, I have no patience for spoiled
children who ask why or
LAURIE SOLOMON wrote:
However, it just might be the case that the images on a given site are not
privately owned images but images in the public domain or that even if
copyrighted they are royalty free images ( sort of like freeware) that
anyone can use in any manner or for any purpose
As I've stated, you just don't know what you're talking about,
and arguing
with you is nothing more than a waste of time.
So stop wasting it Austin. Do the killfile thing. We're all
getting worried
about your blood pressure.
I appreciate your concern. My blood pressure is actually
Please forgive the TOTALLY off topic post. My thoughts are with any list
members any their friends and relatives affected of the attacks in New York
City and Washington DC. I want you to know my thoughts are with you.
Jack Phipps
At 10:03 11/09/01 -0500, you wrote:
Please forgive the TOTALLY off topic post. My thoughts are with any list
members any their friends and relatives affected of the attacks in New York
City and Washington DC. I want you to know my thoughts are with you.
Jack Phipps
I'll second that Jack-I'm in
Please forgive the TOTALLY off topic post. My thoughts are with any list
members any their friends and relatives affected of the attacks in New York
City and Washington DC. I want you to know my thoughts are with you.
What can I say besides that I totally agree. I have always appreciated the
US
Forwarded Message
Received: from 127.0.0.1 by tsphoto (VPOP3) with POP3; Mon, 10 Sep 2001
13:00:19 +0100
Received: from mailout.pacificglobal.net (mailout.maui.net
[209.84.182.242])
by sulphur.cix.co.uk (8.11.3/CIX/8.11.3) with ESMTP id f8AAKWU12704
for [EMAIL
On Sun, 9 Sep 2001 19:27:51 -0500 Tom Scales ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
BS.
It is a hoax.
Shut UP
Tom
THIS THREAD STOPS HERE. IF YOU WANT TO ABUSE EACH OTHER DO IT IN PRIVATE
MAIL.
Regards
Tony Sleep
http://www.halftone.co.uk - Online portfolio exhibit; + film scanner info
On Mon, 10 Sep 2001 14:45:49 +0200 Anthony Atkielski
([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Received: from 127.0.0.1 by tsphoto (VPOP3) with POP3; Mon, 10 Sep 2001
15:00:14 +0100
X-NAV-TimeoutProtection0: X
X-NAV-TimeoutProtection1: X
X-NAV-TimeoutProtection2: X
X-NAV-TimeoutProtection3: X
Rob Geraghty wrote:
Harvey wrote:
Rob Geraghty wrote:
snip Want to bet that it wasn't
any individual musician who chased Napster?
Actually it was a band called Metallica.
And they paid for the WHOLE court case? I'm prepared to be educated here -
if they did pay for the whole
How did you access the PhotoDisk TIFF test file.?
It looks like they have moved it since I originally downloaded it. I went
up one level from the URL I posted and now find it in
ftp://ftp.photodisc.com/Tech/PDTarget . The original 47 MB TIFF file seems
to be gone.
Pat Perez wrote:
Plenty of groups do work once and get paid forever. For example: inventors
who license their patent, actors who earn residuals, songwriters, authors. I
think anyone in a creative field basically has that benefit.
As an example, Phillips, to this day gets a fee on every
Austin writes ...
...
The Piezography driver can use (meaning you get
improved results from) data up to around 720 pixels/inch.
It really diminishes after 420 though, ...
Diminishes according to what? ... getting out your lupe??? Are you ever
going to convince us you can see the
I would definitely pursue the Encarta infringement. Mr. Bill deep
pockets Gates needs a few lessons in etiquette, it would appear.
Art
Rob Geraghty wrote:
Harvey wrote:
musical (intellectual) property is now a *very* hot legal
item.
Only because it's worth billions to some very big
Unusable (to others) filenames would seem quite a reasonable step to prevent
search engines finding your images - but you will not be able to use useful
descriptive text.
I would also point out that search engines only generally index pages of
registered domains or those that you volunteer to
A very useful test file Dean!
This is an excellent test to check how your printer handles curves or lines
that are not horizontal or vertical. On my Epson 9000 I've found that I
don't get the artifacts at multiples of 180 (including 45, 90, 180 and 360).
There is no improvement by sending a file
...
The Piezography driver can use (meaning you get
improved results from) data up to around 720 pixels/inch.
It really diminishes after 420 though, ...
Diminishes according to what? ...
normal viewing distances.
Do YOU have Piezography inks and the driver? Have you experimented to
So why are the rules for artists different
That is the point they are not different. The creation is the embodiment of
the artists talent, skills, creative powers, knowledge, and services (or if
you will the carrier of the artists conception). It is the conception which
is an expression of
Dust removal without IR detection removes detail. If you have a model with
individual strands of hair across her face, the software may remove it
thinking it is a scratch. The same problems with other fine detail. If you
are looking for blurry portraits, it works fine. I think it is known that I
Steve Greenbank wrote:
The point (other than an on-topic dig) is that a 1024*768 image
will have scroll bars round it at 1024*768 - you need to allow
a little for the edges of the window and the title bar. With
copyright (and bandwidth) worries smaller is also better as you
can make a
Respectfully
Creativity in and of itself, is not that scarce. OTOH, creative works, that
contain a message that translates generally are. My wife owns a gallery and
art school. The number of folks who come in with SOMETHING created, and the
creativity of even the grade school participants
39 matches
Mail list logo
