Hi Ken,
this won´t help you here, but in general if you shot slide to scan it then,
you might try out Provia in the future, while being at least as fine grained
as Velvia, it is less hard in its contrast and thus keeps more shadow
detail.
I have seen a Web site (dont have the URL right now, but
Hi.
I posted a query in regard of LS-40 (IV ED) performance for the scanner
users, however nobody answered yet. (I even though no LS-40 users on the
List yet)
Would appreciate if you will give your opinion about this scanner.
I mainly care about his true dynamic range for the ability to
I'm thinking of upgrading my flatbed scanner to one that has a page-size
tranny adapter so that I can do digital contact sheets. (I sure wish Epson
had thought of that when designing the 2450. :-( ) The idea is to be able to
make low-res scans of negatives, preferably while they are still in the
Thanks Jawed, appreciate your input.
In fact, I mostly will scan slides rather then prints.
(I shoot negatives only for portrait and other people-related stuff, using
slides for anything else).
What I meant under AF problem is actually too shallow DOF the Nikons seem to
generate resulting to
If you want to waste a lot of time getting bogged down with a overly
complicated, finicky, difficult to use software program
Overly complicated, finicky, etc is a matter of opinion - we all have our
biases. I find your description to be word perfect for many scanner
drivers but I didn't
the site is
http://www.dl-c.com/Velvia%20vs%20Provia%20100F/Velvia%20vs%20Provia%20100F
.html
On 1/6/02 2:11 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] said:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Bernie Ess)
Sender:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Ken,
this wonYent help you here,
I just released VueScan 7.3.11 for Windows, Mac OS 8/9/X
and Linux. It can be downloaded from:
http://www.hamrick.com/vsm.html
What's new in version 7.3.11
* Added support for reading raw scan files in JPEG format
* Added preliminary support for Scan Elite II
* Fixed focus problem on
- Original Message -
From: Ian Lyons [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, January 06, 2002 1:30 PM
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Silverfast vs. Vuescan
How right you are Mr Lyons in ALL that you said but! I believe the situation
canalso be sumerised in the following
Bottom
line here is: we all have our opinions and the perfect scanner software
hasn't been written yet.
I agree completely. SilverFast is a nice product, and the engineers
at LaserSoft are quite good.
Regards,
Ed Hamrick
But they're not on this list every day helping end users find good
Ed,
Do you have any suggestions for improving VueScan? I'm always
interested in people's suggestions, especially from people who have
tried it and don't like it.
None that I would care to share or advise you of on this list. My earlier
message was not intended to be critical of Vuescan
Owen,
This list has a purpose and those who ask questions tend to do for a reason.
Some (not many) will answer those questions with an alternate agenda. For
the most part I think your posts are designed for no other purpose than to
flame!
I don't think flames are justified.
I wrote this
I have a PowerLook III and use it for (among other things) doing
contact sheets of 35mm filmstrips. It is fine for that job because you
will not be enlarging the images very much nor will you be trying to
get every last bit of shadow detail (if you were, you'd not be leaving
the filmstrips in the
HI all -
I have not been able to get on Adobe's website for about a month. My
connection invariably times out, and I have DSL. Anyone else having
this experience The same thing happens whether I use www.adobe.com
or the Adobe Online link in PS Elements. Any ideas?
Ken
Dana Trout wrote:
I have a PowerLook III and use it for (among other things) doing
contact sheets of 35mm filmstrips. It is fine for that job because you
will not be enlarging the images very much nor will you be trying to
get every last bit of shadow detail (if you were, you'd not be
I just tried it now and it worked okay...
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ken Durling
Sent: Sunday, January 06, 2002 5:47 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [filmscanners] OT: Contacting Adobe
HI all -
I have not been able to get on
Well, she's loading up just fine, here, on my crappy lil 56K connection.
Do you live in a part of the world with lots of free ISP offers floating
around? If so, try another ISP...
Jawed
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ken Durling
At 02:47 PM 1/6/02 -0800, you wrote:
HI all -
I have not been able to get on Adobe's website for about a month. My
connection invariably times out, and I have DSL. Anyone else having
this experience The same thing happens whether I use www.adobe.com
or the Adobe Online link in PS Elements.
I have accessed it 10 minutes ago ... from Italy through ADSL 640/128 ...
I guess you have a problem with your DNS ... sometimes it happens.
Sincerely.
Ezio
www.lucenti.com e-photography site
ICQ: 139507382
- Original Message -
From: Ken Durling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL
Hi Ken Durling:
I have not been able to get on Adobe's website for about a month. My
connection invariably times out, and I have DSL. Anyone else having
this experience The same thing happens whether I use www.adobe.com
or the Adobe Online link in PS Elements. Any ideas?
No ideas.
On Sun, 6 Jan 2002 19:08:16 -0500, you wrote:
I just tried it now and it worked okay...
Thanks everybody - guess I'll see if my ISP can help.
Ken
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with
20 matches
Mail list logo
