Jack Phipps wrote:
Hello Bob!
I checked out your site. It has some great work on it! I'd like to meet
Sidney some time. I've always been fond of birds.
ONE patent is US6195161. There are many other patents pending (well over
100). I recommend you search on Applied Science Fiction or
Just to follow this post up, I've found that the Independent JPEG Group
have developed a utility called 'jpegtran' which performs lossless
transformations on JPEG images. This webpage:
http://sylvana.net/jpegcrop/losslessapps.html
contains a very long list of the various apps which support
I just spent a half an hour writing a reply to this, and Netscape
crashed on my when I went to send it... Poof! Gone!
One more time (this is going to be much more abridged!)
I think I coined this usage, so I will try to explain...
CCD scanners use a chip which contains one or more lines of
and Digital PIC our new process for scanning exposed undeveloped film.
Jack,
This sounds interesting, but how will it work??
Preben
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe
Just installed beta 13.
Are we scanning at dots per inch or pixels per inch?
Larry
***
Larry Berman
http://BermanGraphics.com
***
Just installed beta 13.
Are we scanning at dots per inch or pixels per inch?
Larry
Regardless of the verbiage used, you're scanning at pixels per inch (ppi).
I've always thought that ppi should be used in any scanner interface, but
many software writers disagree, and not just Ed. I just
I just released VueScan 7.5 for Windows, Mac OS 8/9/X
and Linux. It can be downloaded from:
http://www.hamrick.com/vsm.html
VueScan 7.4 can also be downloaded from:
http://www.hamrick.com/files/old/
What's new in version 7.5
* Added support for Scan Elite II, including multi-sampling
*
Mark Otway wrote:
This isn't so, Mark. While you're editing an image is PS,
no jpeg processing is performed. Your'e perfectly safe. The
jpeg processing occurs only when you save the image to a jpg
file, and even then virtually no further degradation takes
place, believe it or not
On Fri, 8 Feb 2002 08:54:22 - Mark Otway ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I know the encoding only takes place when the image is saved in PS (as
opposed to when it's manipulated). But since the act of re-encoding
results in some data loss, if I can perform these simple tranformations
(flip)
Hi Jack,
Okay Austin, I've got the Doctor looking over my shoulder right
now. He says
that with MOST scanners (especially ccd) because of the pixels sensor
density, there is light piping between sensors causing a loss of
sharpness.
I don't believe it's light piping, but electronic
--- Pat Cullinan, jr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I had been a believer in the proposition that multiple jpeg saves
would
degrade an image, but after reading a notice to the contrary in one
of the
trade mags, I did my own trials and now I save and resave jpegs which
aren't even maximum
I'm sure he isn't going to tell you (if he did he'd probably have to
kill you ;-))
You might take the time to read the info from the link Jack supplied.
It goes through the process, as much as they are going to release.
The process is fascinating, and I'm very impressed with the results they
Naturally I have received a complaint about my summary blockage of the Hard
Disk Speed thread. I concede it may have been a misjudgement on my part
that summarily deprived a large number of readers of invaluable
information.
I therefore propose a few revisions to the list charter.
(1)On
13 matches
Mail list logo
