has anyone tried the new Braun scanner.
http://www.braun-phototechnik.de/E/Products/scanner/scanner.htm
Best Wishes
Paul Roberts
mail at Paul-Roberts dot com
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with
FAO Arthur Entlich
Just to sday a big thank you for your advice.
I had set my heart on either the Canon or Epson models but after reading
your email started to re think the idea. (the process was, 1st reading 'no
way', 2nd reading 'well he has a point' and 3rd reading 'it makes perfect
sense'!
Thys,
I too bought one of these about a week ago. I'm just starting on the
learning curve.
After opening the box, I was very disappointed to find it had an
external
power supply which was an American version only. (110V fixed, with a
very
strange looking 2 bladed plug). How can they sell
- Image quality - sharpness: The Canon was definitely sharper and more
snappy on the same image. This could be (and I suspect it is) the
effect of
Digital Ice vs Canon Fare. I intend to do another test with Ice off
(unfortunately I scanned all my Canon samples with Fare on) The
difference
Ok, I'll try it and see - 14 stops huh?! hmmm
- Original Message -
From: Tony Sleep [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 2:10 AM
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: scanning TMAX 3200
KARL SCHULMEISTERS wrote:
The reason I question the 'great dynamic range' is
sirius wrote:
- Image quality - sharpness: The Canon was definitely sharper and more
snappy on the same image. This could be (and I suspect it is) the
effect of
Digital Ice vs Canon Fare. I intend to do another test with Ice off
(unfortunately I scanned all my Canon samples with Fare on) The
Tony,
I have been a little reluctant to convert to a new digital body because of
the low light capabilities (or incapabilities of the digital bodies. Just
haven't seen anyone pull off the look of high speed film in a digi.
I shoot loads of Fuji 800 and Tmax 3200 (rate at 1600). Wow you did a nice
About scanning and grain:
I used Kodak Recording Film for a long time. It was developed in FG
7, 1:3- very concentrated. I used an Exposure Index that varied from
EI 50 to 400. I loved the grain. I am now scanning those negatives
using a Nikon 8000 Coolscan and am very happy with the results. A
On Saturday, October 18, 2003, at 09:58 PM, Paul Kohl wrote:
I am also
buying a glass carrier as Recording Film is very curly and I am
having edge sharpness problems.
Paul Kohl
--
Paul you really need to look at the wet' glass carrier that Michael
Grecco has devised for the Nikon 8000.
I have a Polaroid SprintScan 4000 scanner, and need to connect it to my
new computer, which runs Mandrake Linux 9.1 and Windows 2000. The output
from my scanner is SCSI, and I would like opinions about how best to
connect it to my computer. I could either get a SCSI card for my
computer and
10 matches
Mail list logo
