I had exactly the same experience. I found that using the target
transparency that came with my copy of 5.5 (included with my SS4000) to
generate an ICC profile gave 8-bit scans that were very close to the
original. When I tried high-bit scans I was entirely unable to wrench them
to quality as
Arthur,
Thanks for your reply and tips. Your explanation makes sense. Actually, I
have a refurbished $30 flatbed scanner that has the same problem - just much
worse. I opened this scanner to clean the inside surface of the glas bed.
After leaving the scanner on for a long period of time (1 day or
If anyone has had any experience with the new Pentax Digital SLR, please
contact me off the list. I had a look at one today, and just checked the
specs. On the surface at least, it looks like the sort of thing I was
hoping Pentax would make - a camera that lets me use my existing lenses, and
I have document that is color corrected and sharpened.
Adobe's Image size dialogbox has Pixel size and Document size.
After sharpening, I am using Image size-Document size(with Resample checkbox off)
to change the width, height and resolution without resampling.
My questions are
*Does this
Nagaraj, Ramesh [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: After sharpening, I am
using Image size-Document size(with Resample checkbox off) to
change the width, height and resolution without resampling.
My questions are *Does this document still hold the sharpening? *Should
I have done resizing before sharpening?
I am trying to profile a film scanner (a Nikon LS-2000) using a Faust
IT-8 target. I am slightly confused by the following instructions:
1) Set Input|Scan task to Profile scanner
2) Rename IT8 description file scanner.it8
Actually I understand the first line , but it is the second step
At 10:49 PM 11/5/03 -0500, Ellis Vener wrote:
2) Rename IT8 description file scanner.it8
[snip]
secondly I can download a set of numbers for this particular target
set. I understand that I should somehow plug them in, but how?
This file is the IT8 description file that you are to
Preston,
I do agree with your reply; but I think that your articulation might be
clearer if you had said: Most people recommend resampling before
sharpening instead of Most people recommend resizing before sharpening
since resizing and resampling are two distinct operations which are not
On Wednesday, November 5, 2003, at 11:19 PM, Johnny Johnson wrote:
At 10:49 PM 11/5/03 -0500, Ellis Vener wrote:
2) Rename IT8 description file scanner.it8
[snip]
secondly I can download a set of numbers for this particular target
set. I understand that I should somehow plug them
You are correct; it should not effect the sharpening per se, although it may
alter the perception of the sharpening. When you resize without resampling,
you are only changing the effective resolution but not the actual
resolution. In short if you make the image larger, you are not decreasing
the
On 11/05/03 8:35 PM, Ellis Vener [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Okay I'm dumb (or maybe numb) Where is the IT8 description file?
Wolf Faust usually ships a floppy containing the file(s) along with his
targets. But you can also download them from the links at the bottom of
this page:
11 matches
Mail list logo
