[filmscanners] Re: Sharpening after scanning (SS4000): question forArt

2004-03-24 Thread Arthur Entlich
Hi Stan, I may have mis-spoken or at minimum, been misunderstood. You are correct that sharpening should occur prior to printing. Saving the image sharpened is not necessary, and may, in fact, be detrimental since sharpening adjustments vary depending upon final output size and other factors.

[filmscanners] RE: Sharpening after scanning (SS4000): question forArt

2004-03-24 Thread Laurie Solomon
Art, There is a current wisdom among many including some industry gurus that because of the points you make regarding captures by scanners (and I might add digital cameras), it is beneficial to apply slight sharpening to an image prior to doing any editing of the image, additional sharpening at

[filmscanners] Re: Sharpening after scanning (SS4000): questionforArt

2004-03-24 Thread Arthur Entlich
What you are saying makes sense, in terms of the progressive unsharp masking process, and indeed my own workflow sometimes includes this. One of the reasons I came to this was because I found occasional upsetting artifacts showing up once I had completed the manipulation and compositing work when

[filmscanners] RE: Sharpening after scanning (SS4000): questionforArt

2004-03-24 Thread Stan Schwartz
Are either of you allowing your scanner software to do the initial slight sharpening, or doing it post-scanning? Stan -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Arthur Entlich Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2004 6:23 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:

[filmscanners] RE: Sharpening after scanning (SS4000): questionforArt

2004-03-24 Thread Laurie Solomon
I have never let the scanner software do any sharpening or resampling if I can avoid it; and as I am learning this seems to be in line with current thought. The reasoning for not doing this and leaving it for post scan editing programs are two fold, although there are other reasons as well.

[filmscanners] another Sharpening question

2004-03-24 Thread Ed Verkaik
Hello, I am seeking an opinion about the purpose for sharpening a certain type of image. I have a large batch of unsharpened scans of various cloud forms and skies. In most cases ground detail is minimal or dark. Do you think there is any merit to doing any sharpening to this kind of subject

[filmscanners] RE: another Sharpening question

2004-03-24 Thread Laurie Solomon
I am not sure that that is an answerable question without actually seeing the various images. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hello, I am seeking an opinion about the purpose for sharpening a certain type of image. I have a large batch of unsharpened scans of various cloud forms and skies. In most

[filmscanners] RE: another Sharpening question

2004-03-24 Thread Paul D. DeRocco
From: Ed Verkaik I am seeking an opinion about the purpose for sharpening a certain type of image. I have a large batch of unsharpened scans of various cloud forms and skies. In most cases ground detail is minimal or dark. Do you think there is any merit to doing any sharpening to this

[filmscanners] Re: another Sharpening question

2004-03-24 Thread Ed Verkaik
From: Laurie Solomon [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am not sure that that is an answerable question without actually seeing the various images. Just imagine a typical sky -- either one with cloud elements and blue sections, or cloudy with varyiong degree of light and dark areas (stormy sky). Surely there

[filmscanners] RE: another Sharpening question

2004-03-24 Thread Paul D. DeRocco
From: Ed Verkaik Just imagine a typical sky -- either one with cloud elements and blue sections, or cloudy with varyiong degree of light and dark areas (stormy sky). Surely there are generalizations we could apply to such subjects? I always assumed that since clouds have no natural