[filmscanners] RE: Scanning Overexposed Slides

2004-11-25 Thread Jawed Ashraf
Sadly the big problem with Luminosity channel in LAB is it is a very coarse control. Incredibly, in Adobe's infinite wisdom (similar to the fashion that PSCS is the first product to fully support 16-bit operation throughout, as far as I understand it) the L channel operates on a scale of 100,

[filmscanners] Re: Genuine fractals?????

2004-11-25 Thread Myles
Date sent: Sat, 20 Nov 2004 15:12:13 -0600 Send reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED] From: Laurie Solomon [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:[filmscanners] RE: Genuine fractals? I use the program frequently; and

[filmscanners] RE: Genuine fractals?????

2004-11-25 Thread LAURIE SOLOMON
Well, I do not own that camera and am not familiar with it; but I assume that if you look in the manual you will find that you can capture your images at around 300 dpi and save them to a tiff format; but capturing them at a high resolution around 300 dpi as a RAW file would also be good, as long

[filmscanners] RE: Genuine fractals?????

2004-11-25 Thread Jawed Ashraf
The dpi setting of a digital camera file is utterly irrelevant here. Different cameras output their files (no matter their format) at fixed dpi settings. Different manufacturers of digital cameras have different norms for dpi, but it has no impact whatsoever on resolution or print size. A

[filmscanners] RE: Genuine fractals?????

2004-11-25 Thread Preston Earle
LAURIE SOLOMON wrote: Well, I do not own that camera and am not familiar with it; but I assume that if you look in the manual you will find that you can capture your images at around 300 dpi and save them to a tiff format; but capturing them at a high resolution around 300 dpi as a RAW file would

[filmscanners] RE: Genuine fractals?????

2004-11-25 Thread LAURIE SOLOMON
I beg to differ with you; but I am not going to get into a food fight with you over it. In the case of RAW, you are correct the dpi is somewhat irrelevant in that raw files do not contain any reference to resolution per se only to the size of the image X x Y pixels; however, if you save to a

[filmscanners] RE: Genuine fractals?????

2004-11-25 Thread LAURIE SOLOMON
Preston, technically you are correct in saying failes do not have resolution and even in saying that their contents do not either; but standard non-RAW file formats do contain metadata which furnish rendering instructions which tell the program to render the 3000x2100 pixels or what have you in a

[filmscanners] RE: Genuine fractals?????

2004-11-25 Thread Jawed Ashraf
Put simply, you're confused by the way that certain software applications (e.g. Photoshop or scanner software such as Nikon View) allow the user to specify the pixel-dimensions of a destination image by specifying dpi and linear dimensions (in units that are not pixels - e.g. by requesting an 8

[filmscanners] RE: Genuine fractals?????

2004-11-25 Thread Paul D. DeRocco
From: LAURIE SOLOMON Preston, technically you are correct in saying failes do not have resolution and even in saying that their contents do not either; but standard non-RAW file formats do contain metadata which furnish rendering instructions which tell the program to render the 3000x2100