[filmscanners] Re: Vuescan and 64bit Windows - Ed's reply

2006-06-04 Thread Tony Sleep
On 05/06/2006 James L. Sims wrote: > I am not impressed with ASUS web support. After all the great reviews > about ASUS, that was a letdown. IME Asus are one of the better mfr's, with generally solid boards and a decent record of fixing things that don't quite work. I have used them a lot - 3 her

[filmscanners] Re: Vuescan and 64bit Windows - Ed's reply

2006-06-04 Thread gary
This particular Gigabyte has 8 sata ports with two FRAIDs. I figure once the horsepower of the machine is not enough, it will be at the very least a good server. I lost count of the USB portsl but I believe it has 12. Also two 1394B (yes, the 800mbps) firewire. Also two lans. Dual bios, so you can

[filmscanners] Re: Vuescan and 64bit Windows - Ed's reply

2006-06-04 Thread James L. Sims
My previous machine had a Gigabyte MB and I really liked it. So far, I'm not impressed. It's also my first experience with Nvidia chipset drivers - I was ready for anything else, given my experience with VIA. I may go back to Gigabyte, sooner than later. Jim gary wrote: >I guess I should say A

[filmscanners] Re: Vuescan and 64bit Windows - Ed's reply

2006-06-04 Thread gary
I guess I should say Asus mobos anymore. It used to be my mobo of choice. http://www.iometer.org/ To some degree you can measure disk i/o with the program, though it really flogs your whole system. gary wrote: > FWIW, I don't build PCs using Asus mobos. I find I get a better bang for > you buck

[filmscanners] Re: Vuescan and 64bit Windows - Ed's reply

2006-06-04 Thread gary
FWIW, I don't build PCs using Asus mobos. I find I get a better bang for you buck with Gigabyte. I've built two systems using the GA-k8n Ultra-9 (x64 and Suse 10.0) If you are using onboard raid (often known as FRAID for fake raid), it won't be blazing. I use the onboard raid myself as I really ca

[filmscanners] Re: Vuescan and 64bit Windows - Ed's reply

2006-06-04 Thread James L. Sims
Charles, After I went through a miserable seven hours fighting a blue screen error on startup after the first attempt at installing new chipset drivers, I finally managed to get the new drivers installed and the reader seems to be functioning properly. I have responded to your questions below. I

[filmscanners] Re: Vuescan and 64bit Windows - Ed's reply

2006-06-04 Thread James L. Sims
Tony Sleep wrote: >On 04/06/2006 James L. Sims wrote: > > >> But just as the restart was completing, I encountered the >>much feared blue screen. I wont bore anyone with the details but I >>finally was up and running some seven hours later, with the updated >>drivers. >> >> > >Oh I hate weekend

[filmscanners] Re: Vuescan and 64bit Windows - Ed's reply

2006-06-04 Thread Tony Sleep
On 04/06/2006 James L. Sims wrote: > But just as the restart was completing, I encountered the > much feared blue screen. I wont bore anyone with the details but I > finally was up and running some seven hours later, with the updated > drivers. Oh I hate weekends like that :-} Too often, by hal

[filmscanners] Re: Vuescan and 64bit Windows - Ed's reply

2006-06-04 Thread James L. Sims
Sorry I have been out of this loop for a while. On taking advice to update the BIOS and chipset drivers, I checked the Asus site for updates. There is an "auto update" for the BIOS and a list of chipset drivers on their website. Asus may make a great motherboard but their web support leaves much

[filmscanners] Re: Vuescan and 64bit Windows - Ed's reply

2006-06-04 Thread Charles Knox
Not trying to start an argument here (this post is getting too long already, plus it's really gone off subject), but I still stand by what I said -- self-powered devices will typically run from a non-powered USB port. Case in point: My current machine has 4 USB-2 ports on the backplane, into which