In a message dated 5/7/2001 7:59:22 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I know that your algorithms are different from what ASF does with ROC and
ICE, but it looks like ASF does their ROC first, and then uses information
from ROC to improve GEM. Part of the ROC algorithm identifies what
Does anyone on this list have a Microtek ScanMaker 35t
running on Windows? Someone using a Mac is having a
problem with VueScan on this scanner, and I need to
get a scsi command trace from a Windows system using
this scanner with the Microtek software.
If you have one of these scanners (or any
Is anyone on this list going to the DPIX Expo in Chicago
in two weeks? http://www.digitalphotoexpo.com/
I'm thinking of going, and was wondering if anyone had
been to previous events. Was it worth attending? Do
most of the scanner manufacturers exhibit there? Are
the sessions interesting?
I found a small problem with some Scan Dual II scanners
in 7.0.17, so I fixed this and cleaned up a few other small
things from my to-do list.
You can download VueScan 7.0.18 from:
http://www.hamrick.com/vsm.html
What's new in version 7.0.18
* Fixed problem with Minolta Scan Dual II not
In a message dated 5/4/2001 7:36:20 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have a Minolta Scan Multi and don't seem to be having any problems with
it. I have just started scanning a batch of slides that were taken in
Lower Antelope Canyon and which have lots of dark shadows and black areas
I just released VueScan 7.0.17 for Windows, Mac OS and Linux.
It can be downloaded from:
http://www.hamrick.com/vsm.html
I'm pretty sure the negative color correction problem that was
giving over-saturated reds sometimes is fixed. If you're
still seeing this problem, feel free to e-mail me a
In a message dated 5/3/2001 6:07:17 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Would you like me to translate we'll contact Japan about it into English?
Please go away and leave us alone... we didn't create this problem and
its Japan's fault. If they gave a rats ass, they would have fixed it
In a message dated 5/3/2001 7:40:55 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I'm under the
impression that the open to external window VueScan option doesn't apply
to the Mac.
That's correct - I haven't figured out how to make this work on Mac OS.
If anyone has some sample Mac OS code to take a
In a message dated 5/1/2001 2:19:10 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
It appears that any exposure value less than unity gives the same scan
as an exposure value of unity. Is this expected?
Yes, the field for controlling the exposure only allows for increasing
the exposure.
Regards,
Ed
In a message dated 5/2/2001 12:18:46 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
I've got a similar problem using a HPS20 with Vuescan and scanning
negatives:
Some strong reds are totally burnt.
Yes, I think it's the same bug. I think I know an easy way to fix
this for all scanners, and I'll try
In a message dated 4/30/2001 4:10:16 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
I'm going to try the new negative (with 4th layer) from Fuji : Xtra800, but
which settings should I use in Vuescan?
The Kodak Advantix settings seem to work well with the newer
Fuji emulsions.
Regards,
Ed Hamrick
In a message dated 5/1/2001 2:20:15 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This reminded me that I should put only one question in a mail (ironically
that was even Ed's suggestion to me, even longer ago),
Yes, this maximizes the chances that someone will answer the
question. I learned long ago
In a message dated 5/1/2001 5:06:45 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ed, if you're listening, when are you going to at least tell us
you're *thinking about* separating the grain reduction and dust/scratch
algorithms? :)
I haven't thought about the implications of this yet. I'm up to
In a message dated 4/29/2001 6:33:12 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But don't the Nikon scanners allow the user to choose an XY point on the
frame as the focussing point?
Yes, but I'm not sure how it uses the X point. It might more heavily
weight the contrast at the X point, or it might
In a message dated 4/29/2001 6:45:19 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
That allows you to set the focus point but not in the way I meant. In
Nikonscan
you can click on a point in the preview and use that as the focus point
for the focussing system. So it's an XY location in the image
In a message dated 4/29/2001 3:10:50 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Why not some sort of average of the distances sample points,
weighted according to the amount of surface area represented
by each point. (E.g. if the slide were circular and the samples
along a radial line, each would
In a message dated 4/27/2001 5:32:29 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Does Vuescan support the 1850S?
It's possible that it will work with VueScan. It's an old 1800 dpi
film scanner, and it may work with the standard Microtek scsi
command set. One thing to try is:
1) Delete vuescan.ini
2)
In a message dated 4/28/2001 6:39:14 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This raises an interesting question. Is there any way to set the focus
location in vuescan?
It focuses in the center of the scan region. I'll look into this some more
when I get a loaner LS-4000 from Nikon, hopefully in
In a message dated 4/28/2001 10:37:13 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Not wanting to reply with an obvious observation, I would have
thought picking the 64bit option simply enabled scanning the IR, and
there for Hersch's improved dust removal. Can you elaborate on what
you found? Is
In a message dated 4/26/2001 11:00:45 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I haven't tried Nikonscan 3, since it reportedly does not
deliver hi-bit scan data.
Not with the LS30. It should with the LS2000 or the LS4000 and LS8000.
I think the LS40 may also be bit depth hobbled?
The
In a message dated 4/26/2001 6:11:48 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
So I hear that ICE does not remove dust and scratches from black and white
film. I'm planning on buying the new Canon FS4000US when it comes out (
assuming I don't hear any horror stories). Does anyone know if it's FARE
In a message dated 4/25/2001 11:17:44 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ed has had the SS120 information for some time and worked with the Beta
testers to get the bugs out. Polaroid has always supported Ed's activities.
I have the technical information for the SS120 and VueScan is
close to
In a message dated 4/25/2001 0:08:19 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Which isn't to say Ed has a few issues to work out. Ed may have more to
say, but I believe his evaluation of Q60 target results only in a
matrix-type profile, which, generally is a simplification of a device
profile.
In a message dated 4/24/2001 12:44:16 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am reliably informed that the Nikon 8000 scanner goes on sale next week in
the UK.
Price around £2600 including sales tax (17.5%)
Anyone got one in the US yet?
Is Vuescan supporting yet Ed?
I have the code in
In a message dated 4/25/2001 10:27:32 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As long as the sensor is linear, there's nothing that can even
theoretically be more accurate than a 3x3 matrix transform. This
is what VueScan uses.
...
Just to clarify ... does a simple 3x3 matrix profile
In a message dated 4/23/2001 8:44:01 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
To use the grain remover you have to have an infrared channel in the
scanner, that is why the ASF functions are specific to certain
scanners.
Grain removal has nothing to do with the infrared channel. The
reason GEM
In a message dated 4/24/2001 2:40:31 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
does the software give a command: advance to frame X or
advance to position offset + (distance between frames) * X,
Most scanners use some type of Advance to frame X command,
while the Nikon LS 30/40/2000/4000/8000 use an
In a message dated 4/24/2001 3:50:37 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
For the same reason that Epson hasn't updated the drivers for the Epson
Stylus Pro, or that MS stopped upgrading Win 95. This biz is more about
moving people to the next generation of devices, not to fix the errors
In a message dated 4/23/2001 11:25:15 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I haven't been following the discussion of the Nikon 4000 other than to
catch snippets about edge-to-edge focusing problems/allegations.
It still isn't clear if the edge-to-edge focusing issue is caused by
the lens of
In a message dated 4/23/2001 12:30:43 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Since the Canon has the ability to handle APS built in, and it has
infra-red sensing to deal with dust, and it costs less than any other 4000
dpi scanner, it's a tempting product.
The one thing to be cautious of is
In a message dated 3/12/2001 7:40:53 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Now that you have the LS-40 working with Vuescan... What is your opinion
of scanner?
It's an excellent scanner. The images are some of the best I've seen
from any scanner and the scanner seems basically like an LS-30
In a message dated 3/12/2001 2:43:26 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
there's one thing that's really perplexing to me. why is analog gain
adjustement of the nikon ls-2000 not available for negative film (both
vuescan and nikonscan seem to ignore it when scanning negative film)?
It works
In a message dated 3/12/2001 3:45:17 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Would someone in London PLEASE get Ed a Kodak RFS 3600 to play with?
Someone in Hawaii loaned me one, and I should get it this week.
Regards,
Ed Hamrick
In a message dated 3/12/2001 12:51:14 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
definitely not the case here. unless the preview doesn't show the results
for some reason (it does for positives). i tried previews with 0, 1, 5,
even 20 for the RGB exposure with no changes in the preview.
The
I just released VueScan 7.0 for Windows, Mac OS and Linux.
It can be downloaded from:
http://www.hamrick.com/vsm.html
The main thing I changed since beta 2 is the zooming
now stays centered on the image. In the next few
weeks I hope to add support for Firewire scanners
(UMAX, Epson and Nikon
In a message dated 3/11/2001 3:33:26 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
1)On the Crop tab, move "Rotate" and "Mirror" to the right side of the
tab as they seem to fit better in that group than in the crop-settings
group - I found myself searching for the "Rotate" function several times.
In a message dated 3/11/2001 2:25:59 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I don't want to go further with something that it's (in my opinion)
really OT , but
If it's off-topic, it really should be e-mailed to the person being
responded to, not to the whole group.
Similarly, people who have
I just released VueScan 7.0 beta 2 for Windows, Mac OS
and Linux. It can be downloaded from:
http://www.hamrick.com/vsm.html
There were 118 people on this mailing list who
downloaded VueScan 7.0 beta 1 and I got a lot
of useful feedback. If you have feedback about
beta 2, please e-mail it
In a message dated 3/10/2001 10:18:55 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
To Ed: Would you consider to implement an optional control that allows
one to apply the Clean option
also on the Raw file ?
The output of the raw file happens before the processing (including
cleaning) of
I just released VueScan 7.0 Beta 1. I'm not widely publicizing
this, but the Windows, Mac OS and Linux versions can
be downloaded from:
http://www.hamrick.com/files/vuesca70.exe
http://www.hamrick.com/files/vuesca70.sit
http://www.hamrick.com/files/vuesca70.tgz
What's new in version 7.0
In a message dated 3/7/2001 7:20:30 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ed Hamrick: is there any way you can reverse the order the frames are
scanned in? This would greatly improve the usability of this scanner.
This is on my list of things to look into. It shouldn't be too hard to
make
In a message dated 3/6/2001 7:56:25 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What about subtle rotation of the crop box in the scan window? If VueScan
currently does this, then I don't know how to use it. I have had a few
instance of the slide being a little "off", where I think "off" is on the
In a message dated 3/6/2001 6:10:26 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What advantages does
firewire have over SCSI??
Firewire is theoretically faster than SCSI, but no scanner
is so fast that SCSI is the bottleneck.
Any idea why Nikon switched to fw, and
didn't impliment both?
I
In a message dated 3/6/2001 6:00:02 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
is there any chance we'll see the next version
of VS present the scan properly in "monitor space"??? To reiterate
... if you ask for AdobeRGB color space, Vuescan will show you
AdobeRGB data in monitor space ... and
In a message dated 3/7/2001 1:41:06 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Interestingly, NikonScan 3.0 that came with this scanner
also works with my LS-30. The commands that these
scanners use are almost identical. NikonScan 3.0
with the LS-30 has the same limitations - 8-bits only.
It
In a message dated 3/7/2001 3:16:19 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This time you are wrong, Frank. I'm sure there are more than a couple of us
with 17" monitors. With a 17", anything over 800x600 is dysfunctional. I'm
happy for you that you have something larger, but please don't
In a message dated 3/7/2001 3:16:03 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
One of the keys to effective software design is to make the common
cases easy and the uncommon cases possible.
I completely agree with this. However, one person's logical grouping
of controls isn't logical to another
In a message dated 3/7/2001 3:51:38 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I am going to buy LS4000/LS40 in Japan, do you think that Vuescan will work
with Japanese model, or I need to change firmware ?
I'm pretty sure the hardware is the same for all of them. The power
is 100-240V, 50/60 Hz,
In a message dated 3/6/2001 2:45:52 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
so just let me understand this: auto-exposure in VueScan (at least in the
LS-2000) controls the analog gain controls, not levels? is this the way
NikonScan works too?
The auto exposure in VueScan and the analog gain in
In a message dated 3/7/2001 7:42:04 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
When do you plan to release it at least to play
with?
Probably before this weekend.
Regards,
Ed Hamrick
In a message dated 3/7/2001 9:21:16 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I know Ed has stated in the past that most of the
reason for Vuescan's somewhat crowded interface is to fit it into a 640x480
screen.
I plan to continue making it useful on a 640x480 screen, but this is
quite a bit
In a message dated 3/7/2001 12:05:50 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Main reason for it is the same reason that many "toolbars" in programs are
at the top just below the menus. The reason is mouse movement. If one
exclusively uses one set or the other as alternatives, then it doesn't
In a message dated 3/7/2001 5:50:02 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Read an interesting article about Applied Science Fiction's ROC
technology of restoring color of old pictures, indicating that it makes
its restoration on the basis of distinct patterns of grain-change for
different
In a message dated 3/7/2001 5:04:49 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This all sound marvelousbut does this mean my Prescan Window suggestion
didn't make the cut? Is there hope for this in the future? or is it just
too much programming.
Can you describe what you mean by a "Prescan"
In a message dated 3/5/2001 5:33:29 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As an alternative to scroll bars, would it be possible
to use instead a hand to grab the image with the mouse
and pull it to the location one wants, like ACDSee?
The problem with this is two-fold - clicking in the
middle
In a message dated 3/5/2001 5:20:57 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
When I do a final scan with the SS4000, instead of the carrier being pulled
through continuously, now it's moving with a start-stop motion. Is that an
expected change?
This just means it's running too slowly to keep the
In a message dated 3/6/2001 2:50:05 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
3. it would be really nice if the user interface somehow told you
what options affect the raw file and which don't. is there a list?
There isn't a list. The options are in the Device tab, the
Crop tab, and in the Options
I just thought I'd let the people on this mailing list know that
Nikon loaned me an LS-40 today. I installed it and traced
the USB commands, and it looks like it will be quite easy to
add support for it to VueScan. It encapsulates SCSI
commands in USB packets, and these SCSI commands are
almost
In a message dated 3/6/2001 1:35:30 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
S ... you plan on implimenting 'firewire'. I just read on
another list ... in the context of a "Linoscan " ... you implied no
such plans
I certainly intend to implement SCSI over Firewire (which is what
scanners use
In a message dated 3/6/2001 1:58:56 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Is the main improvement of the LS-40 over the LS-30 the USB connection, 12
bits vs. 10 bits, and slightly higher DPI?
Yes, although with NikonScan it's 12 bits vs. 8 bits. In addition, the
LS-40 adds Digital ROC and
In a message dated 3/6/2001 2:09:02 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
LS40? Is that the Coolscan IV ED?
Yes - that's the same thing.
Interestingly, NikonScan 3.0 that came with this scanner
also works with my LS-30. The commands that these
scanners use are almost identical. NikonScan 3.0
In a message dated 3/6/2001 5:05:01 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
How about support for the ls-8000?
It depends when Nikon can loan me one. They're quite good
about loaning me scanners, so I suspect I'll get this working
right before the LS-8000 and LS-4000 become widely available.
I'm curious what people think of the idea of having
VueScan with one tab visible at a time (i.e. not having
one group of tabs on the right and the preview/scan
visible on the left, but instead one grouping of all
the tabs).
I've figured out how to make updating the preview
and scan tabs almost
In a message dated 3/4/2001 12:42:54 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
After I saw the mis-registration for LEP, I
scanned again at 16x MP only. I couldn't see where LEP improved over
16x MP.
If you have a Nikon LS-2000, the 16x multi-pass scanning will
probably produce better results.
In a message dated 3/3/2001 6:35:33 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
1. In the Color balance tab, what is the difference between "Neutral" and
"Auto Levels?"
Neutral doesn't change the ratio of red to green to blue. Auto levels
uses the brightest point to determine the ratio.
2. Also
I'm thinking about some improvements to the VueScan
user interface, and I'd like to solicit feedback and suggestions.
These are the main things I'm thinking of - let me know if you
don't like these changes or if you'd like to see things done
differently:
1) Adding a "Zoom in" and "Zoom out"
In a message dated 3/5/2001 1:52:06 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
What on earth is a 3X3 matrix?
3 by 3 is the small matrix (or "kernal") around the pixel to be
filtered ... i.e., its nearest neighbors. Other common filter kernals
are 5x5 (a pixel beyond nearest neighbor), and
In a message dated 3/5/2001 3:42:26 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
How does the program know how much fading there was,
vs just a difference in what was in front of the camera lens?
It analyzes the colors of the film grains.
Regards,
Ed Hamrick
In a message dated 3/5/2001 12:34:39 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
When the Long exposure pass was first discussed, you mentioned that
certain scanners had different options for long exposure levels (like 2x,
3x, 4x, etc). However, Vuescan doesn't seem to give you access to setting
In a message dated 3/5/2001 3:43:20 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
1)Ed has previously said that this is an unfortunate but unreformable
byproduct of Clean, Scrub and Scour.
The "Clean" option shouldn't visibly soften the image. Is it softening it?
Is this with Kodachrome film or
In a message dated 3/5/2001 3:46:35 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The thing I'd most like to see is to have the preview window 'live', i.e.,
when I invoke a scan option, have the effect show on the preview. That
would make a whole lot of difference.
The problem with this is that the
In a message dated 3/4/2001 7:53:20 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Using VS on a Mac, is there any advantage to allocating more than the
minimum memory of 91614 kb?
It actually hurts performance to do this, since it takes away memory
from the system that VueScan uses to store the scans.
In a message dated 3/3/2001 1:31:55 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This is after vuescan gets it and does a conversion from the sRGB provided
from the scanner. Unless Ed has changed it and not noted this it the
release
notes he only brings back the values from the scanner under sRGB.
In a message dated 3/3/2001 5:46:16 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
If you use Ektachrome E6, you will obtain saturated colors far
exceeding the gamut of sRGB.
No, this just isn't true. Take a look at the data for the Q60 and
you'll see that there's very little out of gamut, mostly
In a message dated 3/2/2001 0:17:00 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
* Removed "Window|All options" and "Window|Fixed positions"
I'm wondering why. Can you explain, Ed?
I started getting too many e-mails from people saying "I turned on the
"Window|All options" feature and then
I just released VueScan 6.7.5 for Windows, Mac OS and Linux.
It can be downloaded from:
http://www.hamrick.com/vsm.html
What's new in version 6.7.5
* Fixed problem running on Mac OS without USB ports
* Fixed problem with infrared focus on ScanWit 2740S
* Fixed problem with some UMAX
In a message dated 3/2/2001 4:48:53 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
After download of your latest 6.7.5, I cannot get it to install
"over" 6.7.4..6.7.4 dated 3/1 keeps re-installing.Help?
Check that the file size of vuesca67.exe is 857,211 bytes.
If not, you need to download it
In a message dated 3/2/2001 5:30:18 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
a new download and a new re-install show 837..not 857.211...Still
getting 6.7.4...Eddie Wiseman
I restarted the apache web server. This should clear out anything
that still might be in cache. The version on the web site
I just released VueScan 6.7.4 for Windows, Mac OS and Linux.
It can be downloaded from:
http://www.hamrick.com/vsm.html
What's new in version 6.7.4
* Improved cleaning on scanners with infrared channel
(Nikon LS-30 LS-2000, Minolta Scan Elite, ScanWit 2740S)
* Minolta scanners now
In a message dated 3/1/2001 11:18:59 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I safe the RAW file from Vuescan sometimes on CDR. Does the improved
cleaning function just work for newly scanned negs or can older "vue"-scans
benefit from it too?
It works nicely with raw files saved in previous
In a message dated 2/26/2001 6:38:05 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
In fact, I'd consider getting a different inexpensive
flat bed scanner just to be able to use Vuescan for it. Is there one that
you recommend?
The Epson 1240 and 1640 are spoken very highly of by people
who own them.
I just thought I'd drop a quick note to let the Mac users
on this mailing list know that I now have VueScan working
with USB scanners on Mac OS. I'll release this in the next
24 hours as VueScan 6.7.3, but I thought people would like
to know the good news.
It was quite hard to do (I probably
I just released VueScan 6.7.3 for Windows, Mac OS and Linux.
It can be downloaded from:
http://www.hamrick.com/vsm.html
What's new in version 6.7.3
* Added support for USB scanners on Mac OS
(HP S20 film scanner only supported on Windows)
* Improved robustness of USB scanners on
In a message dated 2/26/2001 4:28:15 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I have a Umax Astra 2000U. I opened up Vuescan 6.7.3 but it doesn't
show the scanner in the Scan From option. Is there more that I need to do?
VueScan doesn't support USB Umax scanners, either on Windows
or Mac OS.
In a message dated 2/26/2001 4:28:50 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
1) Do the problem scanners (w/button polling) present the same
problems under Windows? If not, why not?
Windows has a standard way of turning the button polling on
and off, but Mac OS doesn't.
2) Is FireWire next?
Does anybody know how to get rid of this annoying driver-request?
You can get rid of these annoying message by putting the attached
file in c:\windows\inf.
Regards,
Ed Hamrick
; FILMSCAN.INF -- Windows Still Image Setup File for film scanners
; Copyright (c) 2000 Hamrick Software
;
In a message dated 2/21/2001 9:48:20 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Will you be getting a loner to test out Canons new scanner?
No, I don't have any contacts at Canon. I won't be able to add
support for Canon's new scanners until someone loans me one.
Regards,
Ed Hamrick
In a message dated 2/21/2001 2:51:36 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
do you plan to support the UMAX USB scanners, like the Astra 2100U
and its brethren?
No, I don't. These scanners don't use the same types of commands
as the SCSI Umax scanners and would be quite difficult to
In a message dated 2/20/2001 4:47:08 PM EST,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The stated that the chip on the cartridge counted the number of droplets
it ejects.
Removing and replacing the cartridge will NOT effect the drop counter.
End of debate !
You missed the subtle technique for changing
I just released VueScan 6.7.2 for Windows, Mac OS and Linux.
It can be downloaded from:
http://www.hamrick.com/vsm.html
What's new in version 6.7.2
* Fixed problem with Windows polling the buttons on the
front of some scanners while VueScan is running.
VueScan now disables button
In a message dated 2/8/2001 7:21:56 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
And if the $500 LS-30 isn't cheap enough, check this one out!
http://acecam.com/magazine/film-scanner.html
$199 for 1800 DPI, ain't bad at all. Wow, this filmscanner list will really
be hopping. You reckon Ed will
In a message dated 2/9/2001 4:45:05 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
To my knowledge, the only scanners with an IR channel are:
Nikon LS30/2000 (and likely the new ones being released)
Minolta Elite
Acer Scanwit 2740
Yes, this is correct.
As VueScan's ability to do clean up
In a message dated 2/9/2001 2:05:44 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I agree, although Vuescan long pass currently seems to make some very simple
assumptions about the CCD charge bleeding characteristics. At the very
least it would be nice not to have Vuescan include charge bled pixels
I just released VueScan 6.7.1 for Windows, Mac OS and Linux.
It can be downloaded from:
http://www.hamrick.com/vsm.html
I'm going on vacation for a week starting tomorrow, so if
there's a serious problem with this version that can't wait
a week to get fixed, please let me know in the next few
In a message dated 2/9/2001 2:05:44 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I agree, although Vuescan long pass currently seems to make some very simple
assumptions about the CCD charge bleeding characteristics. At the very
least it would be nice not to have Vuescan include charge bled pixels
In a message dated 2/8/2001 7:46:24 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
This is a VueScan request for Ed which I send him also separately by e-mail.
There's no reason to send me two copies.
Is it possible to change VueScan in a way that the slide holder returns
completely into the scanner
I just released VueScan 6.7 for Windows, Mac OS and Linux.
It can be downloaded from:
http://www.hamrick.com/vsm.html
What's new in version 6.7
* Improved cleaning, both with and without infrared
* Added warning message when error writing files
or when disk is full
* Added
In a message dated 2/5/2001 9:59:35 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Any problem with this or reason not to?
There's generally no problem with saving an .ini file from one
version to the next. Occasionally I change some options, but
this seldom causes a problem with saved .ini files.
If you're using VueScan with the ScanWit on Mac OS
could you let me know if VueScan 6.6.3 is working ok
with this configuration? I've had two people report problems
with this, and I'm trying to get to the bottom of it.
This is a bit off-topic for this mailing list, so could you
respond directly
I just released VueScan 6.6.4 for Windows, Mac OS and Linux.
It can be downloaded from:
http://www.hamrick.com/vsm.html
What's new in version 6.6.4
* Fixed problem with some very dark negatives
* Fixed problem with Agfa Arcus and other Acer-manufactured
scanners not being recognized
201 - 300 of 403 matches
Mail list logo
