I ramble ... the setting you want is on the 'prefs' tab, set the value
refresh delay to '0' seconds ... and your changes will now wait for you
to hit the 'refresh' button.
Yes, that did it! Thanks!
Regards,
Henry Richardson
http://www.hrich.com
or 3
best ones for black white. Thanks.
Henry Richardson
http://www.hrich.com
_
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos:
http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx
to offset the very serious disdvantage though.
What do others think?
Henry Richardson
http://www.hrich.com
_
MSN Photos is the easiest way to share and print your photos:
http://photos.msn.com/support/worldwide.aspx
Version 7.5 is coming out in a few days according to Ed and it (if I recall
his message correctly) will put the raw scan back to what it was like
before.
That would be great.
If not, you can certainly run 2 versions of Vuescan simultaneously
(hopefully you've retained the earlier versions on
Awhile back there were a lot of messages concerning the screen resolution
most list members use. While not at all scientific I can provide some
information.
A few days ago I posted a message to this list with this URL:
http://www.geocities.com/hr1066/vuescan703.htm
Yahoo automatically keeps
From: Roman Kielich® [EMAIL PROTECTED]
So, maybe he's out of town?
I received this message from Ed today:
In a message dated 3/21/2001 4:23:16 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You may also refer to the message and webpage I provided yesterday about
grain removal:
I'm quite busy right now
to the message and webpage I provided yesterday about
grain removal:
http://phi.res.cse.dmu.ac.uk/Filmscan/2001/Mar/1093.html
Henry Richardson
http://www.bigfoot.com/~hrich
_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
the whole image then that would make it much more useful.
Maybe Ed or someone else has a better idea about how the Vuescan grain
removal option could be expanded and in a practical sense work even better.
If you do then please give us your input.
Henry Richardson
http://www.bigfoot.com/~hrich
He may not be announcing new releases on the list. In other correspondence
he wrote a few days ago "I'm not on this [filmscanner] mailing list any
more - too many off-topic postings."
--
Bob Shomler
http://www.shomler.com/gallery.htm
If it is true that Ed Hamrick is no longer on the list
Bob wrote:
He may not be announcing new releases on the list. In other
correspondence
he wrote a few days ago "I'm not on this [filmscanner] mailing list any
more - too many off-topic postings."
Bummer. That means he has missed all the postings asking for the grain
removal and cleaning to
. You can download it for free here:
http://www.outertech.com/
Regards,
Henry Richardson
http://www.bigfoot.com/~hrich
_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
From: "Mark T." [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Need feedback on VueScan Improvements
Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2001 16:28:11 +1000
At 09:17 AM 14/03/01 +1000, Rob wrote:
why would you want to seperate these? to allow the
option of
From: Hersch Nitikman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I may have known once, but I can't remember what a CLI is.
CLI = Command Line Interface
_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
Here's a good write-up about grain aliasing:
http://www.photoscientia.co.uk/Grain.htm
_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
From: "Frank Paris" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'm sure we're all using at least 1280X1024 and so there is enough
real-estate so that the tabs won't overflow.
I use 1024x768.
This is the second message I have read in 3 minutes where the author, who
has probably never met any of the other Vuescan
From: Tim Victor [EMAIL PROTECTED]
But the more typical case is working through a batch of a couple
of dozen pictures using the same settings.
And how do you know that is the more typical case? Maybe you are right, but
please point to the evidence that supports your assertion. Maybe Ed has a
From: "shAf" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Since any session, is entirely dedicated to a
particular roll of film, why not move all concerns for film type to a
menu item??
Not sure how you are able to make such a definitive statement. Almost all
of my scanning sessions involve scanning frames from various
From: "shAf" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I happen to believe VS's "raw scan" versus "subsequent crop"
philosophy is its greatest strength and what sets it apart form other
softwares. I believe you ought to emphasize this, and make it
conceptually easy to use, by keeping what addresses the raw scan
From: "Rob Geraghty" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think most of the softening is the dust removal algorithms at higher
settings,
but it's hard to know. Only separating the features would make it possible
to tell.
If you look at the first example on my page you will see that it was scanned
with version
From: Bob Shomler [EMAIL PROTECTED]
One could go back and try dust removal using Vuescan 6.5 (or some release
before 6.6, which is when the film grain reduction was added to vuescan).
Again, I refer you to this page I set up that does just what you suggest:
Has anyone that has a scanner with GEM and ROC compared their results with
Ed Hamrick's recently added features in Vuescan that reduce grain and
restore color? How do they compare?
_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at
From: "shAf" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
My 1st experience with Ed's "scrub" was
disappointing with respect to edges ... it wasn't like a "gaussian
blur", but more like a "median" filter.
I agree. It seems to me that the grain reduction does soften the image. I
showed that on a webpage that I sent to
From: "bjs" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
No, they don't provide any useful information for a more
sophisticated approach.
*shrug* Actually they do. That's why I selected them.
Whether Ed Hamrick can come up with a fix for this apparent hardware problem
or not, it should be pointed out that just
From: "Alan Tyson" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
PSP7 only works with 24-bit images, however, and only
uncompressed tifs.
PSP 7 can read and save compressed TIFF files (and all previous versions I
have used going back to version 4.12 could too). In fact, when saving you
get the option of using one of
From: "Cooke, Julie" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've just had my 6x7 trannies scanned by a lab specialising in digital.
I explained that jpeg was a lossy compression, that information had been
lost when converting to jpeg and it was no good to me. He looked at me as
if
I was mad and said that he uses
From: Jack Phipps [EMAIL PROTECTED]
It is also a good way to show to the lab that
yes, you do loose something at the highest quality setting.
It still seems to me that the main point is that this "digital" lab doesn't
even understand the basics of digital imaging if they don't know that JPEG
From: "Frank Paris" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Here is Giorgianni and Madden's definition from "Digital Color Management":
"Exponent of a power-law equation relating CRT luminance to control-signal
voltage". Also, "The slope of the straight-line portion of a CRT
characteristic curve relating log
and the
new defect and grain removal algorithm. I also have a few comments and
suggestions.
http://www.geocities.com/hr1066/vuescan66.htm
Comments are welcome.
Henry Richardson
http://www.bigfoot.com/~hrich
_
Get your FREE
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: filmscanners: VueScan 6.6 Available
Date: Tue, 30 Jan 2001 12:52:03 EST
I just released VueScan 6.6 for Windows, Mac OS and Linux.
It can be downloaded from:
http://www.hamrick.com/vsm.html
What's new in
From: "shAf" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: filmscanners: VueScan 6.5 Available
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 11:04:17 -0800
Ed makes us aware ...
I just released VueScan 6.5 for Windows, Mac OS and Linux.
It can be downloaded from:
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: VueScan 6.5 Available
Date: Mon, 29 Jan 2001 16:56:45 EST
I worked 10 days
straight, some days till 3 in the morning, getting the new
"Options|Restore colors" feature working. It's quite a subtle
From: "IronWorks" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
And we now have the paperless office that was predicted 5 years ago.
I've been working in the computer industry for 20 years and I'm afraid you
are wrong. The paperless office was predicted more like 15 years ago. :-)
In the last few months I've been having my C41 film processed, cut and
sleeved without getting prints made. Since I started doing this I have
found a significant reduction in the number of scratches on my negatives.
It seems that many of the scratches may be introduced while printing. When
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: VS 6.4.12 Great! But I still have a suggestion
Date: Sun, 21 Jan 2001 05:04:25 EST
In a message dated 1/20/2001 6:36:27 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I discovered this problem yesterday
From: "Laurie Solomon" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: filmscanners: orange mask
Date: Mon, 15 Jan 2001 12:10:01 -0600
There is no reason why said negative
films could not be designed to be optimized for digital uses only (to wit,
dedicated to
Try increasing the preview dpi and see if you get a closer match between
vuescan and PS.
A few days ago Ed told this list that the Preview will rarely match the
scan. Once I found out that the Preview in Vuescan was supposed to be
different than in the other scanning software I have used it
Then I scan the slide at the desired resolution. I test
different settings in VueScan and each time performes an Scan Mem When
I'm satisfied with the look within VueScan I switch it on again and do a
last scan mem to output the file. This way I can use the fast scan mem
to tweak VueScan to best
Ice will not correct physical damage to film and ALL dust removal
softens the image which is one reason you do not see it on higher end
scanners such as Imacon.
David
Ed Hamrick says that the cleaning algorithm in Vuescan in combination with
the infrared channel *does not* soften the image.
Ed didn't send this to the list so I will forward it.
Henry Richardson
http://www.bigfoot.com/~hrich
Original Message Follows
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Did I send this properly?
Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2000 05:11:54 EST
In a message dated 12/14/2000 4:16:58
I had an HP Photosmart until October 1999 and replaced it with a Minolta
Scan Dual at that time. About two weeks ago I bought a Minolta Scan Elite
-- mainly for the infrared channel clean-up feature. Vuescan had a problem
with the Clean, Scrub and Scour filters until version 6.3.19 and now
Is there a good rule-of-thumb for the amount of RAM needed for scanning
editing files at different resolution in Photoshop. This is probably "more
is better," but are some specific recommendations on this?
I used a Minolta Scan Dual (2438 dpi) with 160mb of RAM and that was
adequate even when
,
Henry Richardson
http://www.bigfoot.com/~hrich
_
Get more from the Web. FREE MSN Explorer download : http://explorer.msn.com
42 matches
Mail list logo
