9000 that does scan
Kodachrome quite effectively. However, I don't think that the Nikon
9000 meets the requirement of inexpensive. The Nikon 5000 and the
Nikon V also perform better with Kodachrome than the older models but
not as well at the 9000.
Jack Phipps
Kodak's Austin Development Center
, please email me.
You can go to www.asf.com to get a description of our plug-ins.
Jack Phipps
Kodak's Austin Development Center
Formerly, Applied Science Fiction
Developers of Digital ICE, Digital ROC, Digital SHO and
Digital GEM
with an
on-line search, but it is hard to find one that is helpful. Any ideas
will be appreciated!
Jack Phipps
Kodak's Austin Development Center
Formally, Applied Science Fiction
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED
Hi David.
The Digital ROC and Digital GEM that are included with the scanners can only
be used at the time of the scan.
The Digital ROC plug in can be used with any digital image. There is no
Digital GEM plug in... yet.
Jack Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
-Original Message-
From: David
www.asf.com.
Jack Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in the message title or body
, March 30, 2002 3:49 PM
To: Jack Phipps
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Digital PIC
Jack, what are the pixel dimensions of the largest image included in the
XRDN set?
Bob Shomler
What are the resolutions of the three versions saved to the CDR?
How many bits is the scan?
The three sizes are:
2000
of or just thrown in the drawer, film
will have surface defects that have to be corrected.
I know you love your Polaroid scanner. It is a great scanner. But, it will
be a better scanner with Digital ICE.
Good luck scanning.
Jack Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
-Original Message-
From
by a defect, it is
amplified to restore the image.
We are working with many scanner manufacturers to include Digital ICE into
their products. Look for new models soon.
I hope this helps. BTW I fell in love with Sammy. He's a great model!
Jack Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
-Original
examples and more information this week.
Jack Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
-Original Message-
From: Thomas B. Maugham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
I would love to have an ICE program that works with the SS4000 and VueScan.
Does anyone have any further information about the offerings from ASF
of the surface defects.
Please check out the site for additional description. I probably wasn't very
accurate when I described it as looks through. I hope this description is
helpful.
Good luck scanning!
Jack Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
-Original Message-
From: Clive Moss [mailto:[EMAIL
ago with a CAD (Computer Aided Design) system I managed. It gave
surprisingly good results. We used Kodak instant slide film (no longer
available since the lawsuit with Polaroid).
Good luck.
Jack Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
Hi All
I've been lurking for a while, but not had anything
Opps--
That is a film recorder...
... a rather expensive (over $10,000 used) film scanner
-Original Message-
From: Jack Phipps [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, December 21, 2001 3:20 PM
To: Jack Phipps
Subject: [filmscanners] RE: Fw: OT: Film Recorders
We (our company) has
should go on top). Then erase the top layer reveling the image below.
The Acer 2740 S is a very good, inexpensive scanner that can scan four
slides at once. That may not be much consolation when you have hundreds, but
it is an option.
Good luck.
Jack Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
I just switched from NPH II to NPZ with good results. Before that I used
NPH, also a good choice. When there is enough light, I love Reala. But
shooting a lot indoors, high speed is a must.
On trips, I always carry both, NPZ and Reala. Good luck Herb.
Jack
-Original Message-
From: Herb
I just got back from NYC in early November. They would not let me have my
film hand inspected. I begged, pleaded and threatened. The only time I could
get it hand inspected was at La Guardia. I had about 15 rolls out of boxes
in a zip lock. The took each canister out and swabbed it, about 1-2
-Original Message-
From: Jack Phipps
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 10:30 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Color Negative Film Poll
I just switched from NPH II to NPZ with good results. Before that I used
NPH, also a good choice. When there is enough light, I
]]On Behalf Of Jack Phipps
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 6:30 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Color Negative Film Poll
I just switched from NPH II to NPZ with good results. Before that I used
NPH, also a good choice. When there is enough light, I love Reala. But
shooting
: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 3:37 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: filmscanners: RE: film scanners: X-ray scanners/etc
Judging from your comments, the warnings Kodak and Fuji have on their
websites and Jack Phipps' nightmare with taking film on board, I believe I
will buy and process film
.
Jack
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 5:35 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: RE: filmscanners: X-ray scanners/etc
Jack Phipps [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just got back from NYC in early November. They would
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: filmscanners: RE: film scanners: X-ray scanners/etc
On 11/21/01 6:01 PM, Jack Phipps [EMAIL PROTECTED], wrote:
One of my friends has some business cards he had printed. Something to the
effect that he is a special emissary to some low level government official
(a friend
decide which images go into an album and which don't (you can create an
album for each game for instance). Each album can have a password, so each
team could access their albums, but other teams couldn't.
Feel free to contact me off-list for more information.
Jack Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
Bruce can't post, so here are his comments. I guess an airplane is a good
application, you probably can't hear it over the roar of a window open at 80
knots!!!
Jack Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
Jack,
I sometimes use the ken-lab gyros for motion picture cameras. Be warned,
they can be loud
per second and capture a steady image.
Just another idea.
Jack Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
-Original Message-
From: Rob Geraghty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, November 06, 2001 8:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: 2700ppi
I use the same software, Nikon Scan 3.1, on my G4 Mac for a Nikon 4000 and
it works just fine.
Jack Phipps
-Original Message-
From: david/lisa soderman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, October 25, 2001 8:56 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: filmscanners: Nikon 8000ED w/Macs
for Digital ROC is for faded images. Check out:
http://www.asf.com/products/roc/filmROC.shtml where there is a picture of an
old car before and after Digital ROC. It is also helpful when you have
unusual lighting (tungsten or fluorescent).
Good luck with your Nikon 8000.
Jack Phipps
Applied Science
edded dust in the
emulsion, and defects in the film) then Digital ICE will identify the defect and
attempt removal, usually with success.
Jack
Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001
Please forgive the TOTALLY off topic post. My thoughts are with any list
members any their friends and relatives affected of the attacks in New York
City and Washington DC. I want you to know my thoughts are with you.
Jack Phipps
, these tests are based on using the Epson print driver inside of
Photoshop to drive the Epson 9000, not the external RIP. Your results may
vary.
Jack Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
-Original Message-
From: Shough, Dean [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, September 10, 2001 9:44 AM
To: '[EMAIL
vibrant and alive when I compare the
before and after.
Jack Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
-Original Message-
From: Barbara Martin Greene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, September 09, 2001 7:45 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: filmscanners: Re: Filmscanners dust removal software
.
Jack Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
-Original Message-
From: John Rylatt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, September 06, 2001 8:16 PM
To: filmscanners
Subject: filmscanners: Selecting a scanner
I am new to this list and would appreciate some advice on selecting a film
scanner
Exciting stuff Rob! I love seeing your airplane pictures. Keep up the good
work. I probably won't see the magazine over here, but you should share a
link where we can see them on-line. Congratulations.
Jack
-Original Message-
From: Rob Geraghty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday,
defects. I also scan a lot of old images. For old poorly handled
images I wouldn't consider a scanner without Digital ICE.
Jack Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
-Original Message-
From: Barbara Martin Greene [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, September 01, 2001 6:08 AM
To: [EMAIL
-- 10 sec.
11 sec.
150MB -- 15 sec.
17 sec.
375MB -- -- 30
sec.
http://www.like.ca/Durst/Sigma_page.html
Jack Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
-Original Message-
From
Phipps
-Original Message-
From: James Schenken [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2001 7:34 PM
To: Jack Phipps
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Cleaning slides using Digital ICE
At 09:15 AM 06/18/2001 -0500, you wrote:
I will only list the consumer products (there are many digital
I'm using a Nikon 4000 as we speak on a Mac G4 with 8.something OS. Digital
ICE, Digital ROC and Digital GEM are working just fine.
Jack Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
-Original Message-
From: Chuck Phelps [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 11:44 AM
To: [EMAIL
Thanks Steve. I've sent it three times to the list. I guess it was too
large. To bad I didn't think of LZW.
Jack Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
-Original Message-
From: Steve Greenbank [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, July 11, 2001 11:37 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re
a small difference between the lines. On my
Epson 9000 it happens when you resize to 300, 240, and almost any odd size (like
304). It doesn't happen when you resize to 45, 90, 180 (the current size), 360
or 720.
Jack
Phipps
Applied Science
Fiction
to tell the difference in the final print
(between 180 and 360 upsized). If you send the Epson anything besides a
multiple of 360 (45, 90, 180, 360, 720) like 240 or 300 you will be able to
tell subtle differences when Epson resizes (see explanation below).
I hope this helps!
Jack Phipps
Applied
You can check our website: http://www.asf.com.
On the following page of our FAQ questions 6 and 7 answer your question
(I've listed them below).
http://www.asf.com/support/FilmICEFAQs.shtml#Q6
Q6: Which scanners are available with Digital ICE?
A6: Acer's ScanWit 2740S
it removes the
noise without blurring the film.
I'd
like to hear about your experiences too.
Jack
Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
-Original Message-From: Wilson, Paul
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 3:43
PMTo: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'Subject: RE:
filmscanners
I
think you'd be a lot happier with the Acer 2740 at a similar
price.
Jack
Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
-Original Message-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, July 05, 2001 12:58
PMTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: filmscanners:
Canoscan 2400
if some of our newsgroup members uploaded images instead of
me. If you don't, people will have to look at my images:).
Mention my name in the comments and I'll send you a luggage tag (woop-ti-do!
but we're out of tee shirts) until I run out.
Thanks in advance!
Jack Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
guessed
at earlier.
Jack Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
-Original Message-
From: Jack Phipps
Sent: Wednesday, May 30, 2001 9:55 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Full Frame with the LS-2000?
Yes, I filed the black plastic on one frame of my FH-2 strip film holder. I
have
it to.
Sometimes I position the negative up or down and sacrifice one side of the
image or the other. So far (knock on wood) I haven't needed 100% of both
sides. I guess I could scan twice and paste...
Jack Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
-Original Message-
From: Michael Hintlian [mailto:[EMAIL
restoration FAST and more
effectively that hours with an image editor!
It looks like a busy week here, but I hope to post some comparisons soon.
Jack Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
-Original Message-
From: shAf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2001 2:06 PM
To: [EMAIL
, if I were choosing between a scanner with Digital ROC and Digital
GEM or a scanner without it, I would choose the one with. And if I had any faded
negatives (boy do I) it would make the decision even
easier.
Seeing
is believing.
Jack
Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
-Original Message
have a Kodachrome setting used correcting color
problems. It is my experience that Digital ICE does not affect color.
It is important to note that Digital ROC and Digital GEM are not affected by
the Kodachrome limitation discussed above.
Jack Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
-Original Message
in
the past that it doesn't work because we feel it is important not to
misrepresent our product. We'd rather say it doesn't work on Kodachrome at
all then to imply it always works.
There might be some feedback from this user community on the effectiveness
of Digital ICE on Kodachrome.
Jack Phipps
Opps?
It is important to try it on your negatives.
Since when did Kodak make Kodachrome negatives?
Sorry, I should have proofed better.
Jack
-Original Message-
From: Jack Phipps
Sent: Monday, May 07, 2001 11:17 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: filmscanners: Digital ICE, Digital
believe it is in the interest of the
scanning community as well, that I promote Digital ICE. If I'm too excited
about it, I apologize.
Jack Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
-Original Message-
From: Laurie Solomon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, May 01, 2001 9:27 PM
To: [EMAIL
I saw
FARE demonstrations at PMA in February. I recommend you do a comparison between
FARE and Digital ICE before you purchase a Canon scanner.
Jack
Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
-Original Message-From: Chris Hargens
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2001 6
Another way to reduce noise is with Digital GEM.
Jack Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
-Original Message-
From: Hemingway, David J [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2001 1:48 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Polaroid 4000 dpi
A word on noise
David--
Will you be sharing the results of your survey with the group?
Jack Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
-Original Message-
From: Hemingway, David J [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, April 26, 2001 10:14 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: filmscanners: System configurations
hello again Jack :o)
What's the deal with ICE^3 support for the new Nikon scanners only??
If Nikon offers NS3 for the LS-2000, why not offer the full deal???
shAf :o)
That is out of our control. I'll pass it on to Nikon though, it sounds like
a good idea to me.
Jack Phipps
Applied
think you'll like it.
Jack Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
Collin and Todd--
I got this informtion from one of our Acer scanner users. It may help answer
your questions.
Jack Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
Jack:
- here is the information that Maury pulled together to respond to your
chat-room's comments regarding Acer 2740S performance.
- as you relay
. I'm
not sure why the file increased in size when I compressed it.
Your results will vary depending on the image you use. I hope this data is
useful. Your conclusions will vary depending on your needs obviously.
Good luck.
Jack Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
On Mon, 2 Apr 2001 14:37:09 +0100
Good job Tony. You've got a tough job I don't envy. Keep up the good work.
Your friend,
Jack Phipps
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, March 22, 2001 10:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: filmscanners: ADMIN: OT, bad tempers, etc
You can run each one separately or together in any combination.
Jack Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
-Original Message-
From: Dale Gail [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2001 6:14 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: filmscanners: Digital ICE 3
With the new Nikons
were impressive.
I hope you understand our situation and will continue to consider our
products.
Jack Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
-Original Message-
From: Michael Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
I never did a get a
straight answer from Jack at ASF on why we can't buy GEM
. There is hair or lint that is in the original record. It is still
there. Only the surface defects are corrected. We don't "guess" at what is
under the defect or color it in for surrounding pixels, we correct the
surface defect.
Jack Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
-Original Message
"Mode: On (Sharpen)". This should solve your
problem with the sharpness.
The grain shouldn't affect function of Digital ICE.
Jack Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
-Original Message-
From: Rob Geraghty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
"John Matturri" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
to contact your scanner manufacter. They may be able to provide our
products to you.
Jack Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
-Original Message-
From: Michael Moore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
So when will you guys make your super software available to the end users? I
have a Minolta Elite
Opps! I gave a big thumbs up to the ACER 2740S not the Canon. It has a lot
of bang for the buck.
Jack Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
-Original Message-
From: shAf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 08, 2001 9:47 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Canon
it will amplify any differences. I'll send you some example
files.
Jack Phipps
-Original Message-
From: Stan Schwartz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 05, 2001 9:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Re: Scanning problems
Jack,
I tried this on a 50 MB tiff
a difference in the quality of scans.
Good luck in picking a scanner!
Jack Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
I've just been reading some Nikon literature about their new scanners, and
I have some questions about the terminology. The ad states that the
coolscan IV ED yeilds 48 bit images (48 bits per
that or is there an
archive where I can post the results. I would be glad to send them to you
Julie in a separate email.
Anyway, good luck with your project.
Jack Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
-Original Message-
From: Cooke, Julie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 05
format
using 36MB or a 100% increase in size. Maybe I shouldn't have used
information?
Jack Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
-Original Message-
From: shAf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, February 05, 2001 3:50 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Re: bit depth
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jack Phipps
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2001 6:48 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: Future of Photography (was filmscanners: real value?)
Unless it is color. Then it would be:
24mm/25.4=.944 inches x 5080 = 4800
36mm/25.4=1.417 inches x
).
Jack Phipps
-Original Message-
From: Austin Franklin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2001 1:42 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: Future of Photography (was filmscanners: real value?)
As for the resolution needed to equal 35mm film, I think I
have seen it quoted
) so it now can get all the
way to the edge.
Good luck
Jack Phipps
Applied Science Fiction
-Original Message-
From: Robert Kehl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 19, 2001 2:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: filmscanners: SS4000 and LS-2000 real value?
Thanks to very
71 matches
Mail list logo
