One would be to replace the glass with anti-newtonian rings glass if it is
not already that. Another would be to use an anti-newtonian ring powder on
the glass between the negative and the glass. I suppose you could use the
two in cnjunction with each other as well as separately.
The powder has
Austin,
>If someone's comments are NOT directly related to film scanners, then I
>believe the comment should be off-list, but if it is directly related TO
>film scanners, then I have no problem with the discussion being on-list.
But there is the rub. Each and every commentator thinks that his o
The topics of density range and dynamic range are relevant and pertinant to
scanners and scanning; unfortunately, the discussion has taken on a life of
itsown and ranged away from what is relevant and pertinent to scanning and
scanners to what is of interest to engineers and academics. This is ha
(Smile) I really would not know if they did or did not come with GF in the
past or currently. I do not own a Nikon scanner. I just accepted the
information that others posted that theirs had come with it but it was not
the full version. My comments were on the various editions of GF and how in
t
Ops! This was suppose to be a private email and not addressed to the list;
my error. Sorry if it inconvenienced anyone.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Laurie Solomon
Sent: Saturday, August 17, 2002 10:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
My understanding is that Toronto, Canada, is and has been off and on the
most expensive place in North America, followed by New York and, at one
time, Vancouver (right after the Chinese flight from Hong Kong). Most of
the large American cities are more expensive than the smaller ones in the
count
don't know better, and some that should know better, misuse technical terms,
does not mean that we should all fall in and misuse them. Education is
partly about learning the correct terms for things that need to be
distinguished.
I will say no more, but will continue to try to educate others to use
termi
Austin,
Like it or not, DPI tends to be the common usage in the everyday world even
if technically it is the wrong terminology and should in the case of
scanning be PPI. I think that you may be being a little picky here; but
more importantly, holding the wrong party accountible for the industrie
Maris,
As this post came through, I am unsure which is your statement and which is
the quoted statement you are responding to; but I assume it is the second
one. I agree entirely with it, although I typically tend to refer to
resolution in this situation as "effective resolution" rather than as
Austin,
I really don't want to dance, so I am not going to get into the "he said,
she said thing"
I am going to stick by my interpretation of what was said and how each of
you has interpreted it. For now, I am not concerned with the "maximum
acceptable signal", given that I understand everyone's
states it will upgrade to Genuine Fractals PrintPro which
supports CMYK and CIE-Lab support.
Brian
--
respond to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "Laurie Solomon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMA
I experienced something very similar when trying to operate a Minolta Scan
Multi and a Umax PowerLook II on the same SCSI chain along with some other
devices. The flatbed Umax was very picky about where it came in the
physical cable chain, insisting on being before the Minolta no matter what
the
>I have to disagree with Laurie on this one and also to remark that I think
>Anthony Atkielski *continuously* thumbs-his-nose at everything and
everyone.
>As for Laurie's alleged agreeing with Anthony on this one, I'm still
>listening.
You can agree or disagree with me and we can discuss
PROTECTED]
Subject: [filmscanners] RE: film departing soon
Are you saying that the Epson Matte Heavyweight paper, which is what they
claim has the greatest longevity, isn't coated?
--
Ciao, Paul D. DeRocco
Paulmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> From: Laurie Solomon
>I have both this scanner and the other device on the chain fully
>booted up before I start the computer. I have tried three different
>SCSI ID numbers so far and two different slots for the host card.
Ok, that eliminates those things as potential sources.
>To my knowledge, these things are all
>Not sure what you mean by the 'full' version of Genuine Fractals.
Neither am I sure what Dorothy Cutter means.
>the version of Genuine Fractals that was included in my package was also
>not the 'full' version. It was a version that worked in RGB mode but not
>CMYK mode.
But I am also not sure
val fiber-only papers were not designed to be used
with inkjet inks, were they? Rarely can you have everything in life!
Bob Frost.
- Original Message -
From: "Laurie Solomon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Most commercial photographic papers are RC (Resin Coated - i.e., plastic
coa
I have used the earlier PowerLook II to scan 4x5 negs and transparencies at
600 dpi and found that to be satisfactory for my purposes, which typically
involved retouching of copy negatives or portfolio prints of commericial 4x5
transparencies from jobs I shot. I too just got a PowerLook III with
Most commercial photographic papers are RC (Resin Coated - i.e., plastic
coated) papers and not Fiber papers which do not have a resin coating.
Similarly, most papers designated as being for inkjet printing (as opposed
to various watercolor and fine art papers, linen and canvas type media) tend
to
>But it's not quite that easy nor as cut-and-dried as the above. For
>example, you've just thumbed-your-nose at the state-of-the-art in
>professional event photography. On-line proofing is currently all the rage
>in that area...especially for out-of-town customers.
Well actually it is. I have
Mike,
I have systems that run Win XP and some that run Win98. Unlike some, I have
had some problems with my XP system. Some of the problems are the product
of bad and/or obscure documentation of features other than the glitzy
consumer features. Most of my other problems have been the result of
Come on Anthony, you can do better than that. The very least you could do is
cause Thomas to think by giving him the paradoxical response of "No." :-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Anthony Atkielski
Sent: Sunday, July 07, 2002 2:35 AM
To
Gentelmen,
It appears that this is no longer an attempt to clarify things or come to
some common conclusion as much as it is an attempt to WIN an argument. I
think neither of you will convince the other to accept your terminologies
and definitions - let alone agruments - as your own; nor do I thi
Here I go again. I understand what both of you are saying; and you are both
right except you are approaching the topic from two different points of view
and philosophies. It is almost like the tree that falls in the forest
question at if it makes an noise if no one is there to hear it or not. I
>Since JPEG is lossless and TIFF is not, this is to be expected.
Don't you have this reversed? My understanding is that JPEG is lossy while
TIFF with LZW is lossless.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Anthony Atkielski
Sent: Monday, June 10
Your clarification has helped; and I have no significant disagreement with
the gist of your statements now that I understand what you are saying and
what you are using as your reference criteria.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Anthony Atk
20 PM 6/9/02 -0500, Laurie Solomon wrote:
>Although I concur with all you have said, I have to wonder if the publicist
>and publisher are requesting jpeg files rather than lwz compressed TIFF
>files out of force of habit, lack of knowledgabout the ability to compress
>TIFFs using the
09, 2002 8:10 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: JPG sharpening [was: Color spaces for
different purposes]
"Laurie Solomon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> asked:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>Scans do not contain more detail than a low-compressi
We may have taken separate paths to get there; but I believe that we both
reached the same conclusion for either different reasons or by using
different means of expression. :-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Anthony Atkielski
Sent: Sunda
>Dynamic range is, in our case, (dMax - dMin) / noise.
I guess I tend to want to stay away from that definition in part because I
am not really able to visualize it very well; but I can visualize "Dynamic
range is the number of discernable values within a density range (in our
case)" much better s
>All images are bitmaps at the time of sharpening. The format in which they
>were or will be stored is irrelevant
I have no problem with that. My reference was to the possibilities of
separating the conversion process from the compression process when saving
to JPG format and not with the state
>However, if you save an image as JPEG using the lowest (least) possible
>compression, the saved version will be essentially identical to the
original
>scan.
I agree with this; but in many if not most cases, the compression level used
or required is greater then the lowest possible amount, rangin
Of course, I hope you understand that my question was rhetorical. I hope
that you were just using my rhetorical question as a vehicle for expressing
your remarks rather than taking it seriously as a literal question in need
of an answer.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto
Really good answer Robert.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Robert Meier
Sent: Sunday, June 09, 2002 11:27 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [filmscanners] RE: JPG sharpening [was: Color spaces for
different purposes]
> -Original Me
Peter,
It must be the nature of the discussion or the topic; but just when I think
I am beginning to get a handle on it something muddies the water. :-)
The first point of confusion in your discussion with Austin appears to be
that what you are referring to as "dynamic range" he is referring to
>Another aspect of purposing, different for different destinations, is the
file format. I've had more than one publicist and >publisher request that I
provide (email, ftp) a jpeg in preference to a tiff because of the file
size. (For this I use a
>high/maximum quality in photoshop terms: 10 to 1
I agree that for web use Jpg may very well be a necessity and that
sharpening just before converting to a given level of compression when
converting to JPG may be the best way to go since in most case those
downloading the web image will not be resizing the image for serious uses
and/or then resav
ubject: [filmscanners] RE: Density vs Dynamic range - was: RE:
opinions? Reviews? of Primefilm 1800 ?
On Sat, Jun 08, 2002 at 09:43:00AM +0100, dickbo wrote:
> Bits equals available grey levels per pixel
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Laurie Solomon" <[EMAIL
> Density values are
>absolute values, just like one foot is an absolute value. They have
meaning
>in and of them selves. Someone decided what the exact length of one foot
is
>(within a tolerance of course), as well as density values.
Just as a point of levity did not Einstein's theory of relat
t - conversion from TIFF to JPG reduces file size and
apparently compresses, I would think to Maximum quality. Sharpening at that
point was what I was suggesting, before saving as a more-compressed JPG.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "Laurie Solomon" <[EMAIL PROTECTE
for taking the time to respond.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of dickbo
Sent: Saturday, June 08, 2002 3:45 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: opinions? Reviews? of Primefilm 1800 ?
- Original Message -
From: &
Ok, that makes more sense to me now. However, since the sharpened JPG file
upon opening by an user may then need to be resized and sharpening is
dependent on the image size, you have a problem. It will then need to be
resharpened for it new size which may result in artfacts being produced
since
> re-open and recompress absent drastic sharpening artifacts in
> the compressed
> JPG.
>
> Maris
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Laurie Solomon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Saturday, June 08, 2002 11:56 AM
&
scanners] RE: Density vs Dynamic range - was: RE:
opinions? Reviews? of Primefilm 1800 ?
On Sat, Jun 08, 2002 at 09:43:00AM +0100, dickbo wrote:
> Bits equals available grey levels per pixel
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Laurie Solomon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
On Behalf Of dickbo
Sent: Saturday, June 08, 2002 3:43 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: opinions? Reviews? of Primefilm 1800 ?
Bits equals available grey levels per pixel
- Original Message -
From: "Laurie Solomon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL
Hi Austin,
Yes I am fully cognizant of the fact that we are talking about optimum
conditions and limits under usually ideal conditions when we talk about
capabilities or capacities and that we are not talking about certainties in
practice under practical concrete empirical conditions.
Thanks. I
>One pre-press expert in my area recommends ColorMatchRGB instead of
>Adobe98 for pre-press work. Is this a Mac vs. PC thing?
Primarily, yes it is both a Mac thing and a preferrential prejudice. From
what I understand, the two are very similar in terms of the gammut that they
cover.
Maris's com
>It would probably be better to convert to JPG first and then sharpen.
Theoretically maybe; but out of curiosity, how does one do this in actuality
when one would have to first decompress the JPG file before one could carry
out the sharpening operations. Afterwhich, one would then recompress the
Austin,
> That is correctproviding the system can actually take
> advantage of those
> bits. If you have a 24 bit converter, and 12 bits of it is
> useless (noise),
> then what good are the 24 bits?
Yes, that is a given (I understand that and accept that as a limiting
condition).
As for the
t; Magicscan and a
> registry fix on the Umax site caused my scanner to be listed properly
> without the new firmware.
>
> Lloyd
>
>
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Laurie Solomon
> Sent: Saturday, May 25,
the time to engage me in this
conversation and even to refute me when necessary.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mike Kersenbrock
Sent: Wednesday, May 15, 2002 1:08 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: 3 year wait
Laurie
about it being primarily good for presentational graphics more than serious
images.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mike Kersenbrock
Sent: Sunday, May 12, 2002 8:30 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: 3 year wait
Op's w
Austin,
I am not familiar with the internal workings of film recorders to claim
knowledge; but I have discovered that different 4K film recorders can have
different size lights which effect the brightness and the amount of detail
that the film recorder sensors can pick up - thus the actual effect
Arthur,
I make no claims to expertise or to being even all that knowledgable with
respect to film recorders. I recently picked up cheap on Ebay a Polaroid
Digital Palette 5000s film recorder to play araound with and learn something
about film recorders and recording. It is obsolete and 35mm; and
The perfromance bargain right now seems to be the Western Digital WD1200JB,
with performance benchmarks close to the 10K SCSI drives. Yes, SCSI drives
are faster, but cost many times more for the same storage.
Åke
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On B
: [filmscanners] Re: 3 year wait
Laurie Solomon wrote:
>
>>"4K" simply means 4000 (and 96) pixels across the 36mm film chip.
>>Actually, 2889.9ppi.
>>
>
The problem above is the direction of the film being measured.
A film recorder refers to the longer dimensio
>How, also, does RAID interact with PS's desire for partitions?
There should be no problems since you can partition a RAID array the same as
you can any single individual hard drive in a single or multiple drive
setup. If the RAID is a mirrored arrangment, the paritions on the mirrored
drives in
>I'm getting a system with 1.5 GB of RAM and 2 80MB 7200
> drives (CPU: Athlon 1800+). Aside from possible
> video-editing, would there be a reason to set the drives up
> as RAID-0 (which is supported on the motherboard I'm using
> so doesn't add to the cost).
If I am not mistaken, I believe that
>Actually, Anthony, a "disk array" is external to the system and has
cooling
> designed for the hotter drives
Actually, it does not have to be external to the system, although many -
especially SCSI RAID arrays - are. My motherboard has an EIDE RAID array
that is an integral part of the motherb
> If you can afford and configure 10 GB of RAM, so much the better
I know of no PC motherboard that will support that much RAM even if one
could aford to buy it. What motherboards do you refer to in suggesting more
than 2-3GB of physical RAM?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[
Thank you. Yor remarks have help clear up a number of points of confusion
for me.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, May 10, 2002 11:09 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [filmscanners] Re: 3 year
While others have given yo some very good answers, I would like to address
three tangential issues that you hint at.
First, as for the advice of distributors and retailers, remember that they
are selling products and seek to push customers toward the products that
they have in stock and which fur
rs] RE: Scanner profile
In Photoshop I use Photoshop's own CM engine.
I was told I will have to Assign Profile with the scanner's calibrated
profile to the image brought into the Photoshop to do the thing.
Regards,
Alex Z
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL
>The scans delivered to Photoshop seemed overexposed
Completely speculative, what is the Photoshop working color space set for?
Could it be that this working space is is the problem in that Photoshop is
translating the scan input into its working space which is being displayed
on the monitor whil
ED]]On Behalf Of Todd Flashner
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 7:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Tiresome Arguments Ad Infinitum
on 4/17/02 2:46 PM, Laurie Solomon wrote:
> Todd,
>
>> On another list, in a thread similar to this one, (fed up with the
>
PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Difficult scan problem
On Mon, 15 Apr 2002 20:30:13 -0500 Laurie Solomon ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
> Tony, what if the "constant colour temp lightsource" is a fluorescent
> discontinuous light source such as what he has said was
some
people who get this mailing list sent to a Yahoo email address.
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Laurie Solomon
> Sent: Sunday, March 31, 2002 3:16 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [filmscanners] RE: Ya
: Saturday, March 30, 2002 11:53 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Yahoo Automatic Spam Generator
I don't think he ever said that this was a Yahoo Group. i gather it's
just a general warning and a solution:)
- Original Message -
From: "Laurie Solom
Very interesting; but I believe that the Filmscanners list is not a Yahoo
group. It is not owned or run by or through Yahoo (although Yahoo may very
well have pirated the postings on the list and put them out as if the group
was one of theirs, which constitutes both theft and copyright violation.
we even addressing the
sa,me topic.
- Original Message -
From: "Tomek Zakrzewski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 5:00 PM
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: VueScan FIY (was: Polaroid's future)
>
> Laurie Solomon
> I started the copying to film suggestion and didn't mention a type
>of film. It seemed to be just assumed somehow that it was color.
Sorry, my mistake. While you may not have mentioned color film, it seems to
have been taken that way by those involved in the discussion; and they just
ran wit
02/05/02 5:24 PM, Laurie Solomon at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In the case of lantern slides, it is not how big are they as much as how
> thick are they and how good is the emulsion that is painted on the glass
in
> an unprotected manner. Remember were are actually talking about small
glas
According to Ed Hamrick, in his software, all channels scan equally
percentage wise for black and white. For chromogenic films, I do not know
because it would seem you would not be setting the scanning software on
grayscale or b&w when scanning it but on RBG even though it is suppose to
produce g
It sounds like there is an IRQ conflict in the system where the SCSI card is
conflicting with your video card. If your video card is an AGP card, then
you can not change the location of it; but you can rearrange the location of
the SCSI card vis-à-vis the other PCI cards in terms of the slot it i
Ed is this the case for only that model of Minolta scanner or for all the
models of Minolta scanners that you support?
As an aside, I commend you on your software. I was unable to get Windows XP
to recognize a Umax PowerLook II flatbed scanner connected to an Adaptec
2906 SCSI card (first in a d
Try the "Add/Remove Software" section of the Control Panel
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Ezio c/o TIN
Sent: Wednesday, December 26, 2001 3:08 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [filmscanners] Trashing Adobe Gamma
Dears, in a Windows 98
bject: [filmscanners] Re: Full frame scans
on 12/23/01 1:59 PM, LAURIE SOLOMON wrote:
> It is possible for 35mm and maybe some of the smaller medium format
sizes -
> 645 and 6x6 - on the Minolta Scan Multi and Multi II (I do not know about
> the Multi Pro, although I suspect it is possible
It is possible for 35mm and maybe some of the smaller medium format sizes -
645 and 6x6 - on the Minolta Scan Multi and Multi II (I do not know about
the Multi Pro, although I suspect it is possible there too). However, I do
not think you would like the process with respect to 35mm and 645 format
Since it is my post that is cited below or to which this post has been
attached, I will respond.
With the introduction of the Scan Multi II, Minolta introduced a Universal
Film Holder which was I holder with masks that you cut your self ( I do not
know if it was glassless or not). The customized
inolta and med format
Actually, it looks like I'm at least partially wrong on this. I didn't know
about this other film holder. Are there any pictures of it on the web?
They have versions for both the Scan Multi and the Scan Multi Pro.
Paul Wilson
> -Original Message-
> Fr
imply, no stitching is needed to scan
at 3200 dpi or 4800 dpi for medium format film up to 6x9.
Paul Wilson
> -Original Message-
> From: LAURIE SOLOMON [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Tuesday, December 18, 2001 1:52 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: filmscanners:min
I think some clarification is needed hear. The Minolta medium format film
scanners which includes both the Scan Multi, Scan Multi II, and Scan Multi
Pro do not require one to scan in sections and do post scan stitching for
formats up to 6x9cm at the maximum optical resolutions for those formats
(
True and a good point that I did not mention, focusing more on the idea of
scanning medium format at maximum optical resolutionjs without focusing on
any particular model.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Erik Kaffehr
Sent: Monday, December
Roger,
The
way it works is that Digital River handles the financial and the ordering end of
the operation for the software company. If you order a hard version, they
make the arrangements for the shipping of the software from the appropriate
warehouse. If you download the software, they fu
First it is not the "Dimage Scan II" that scans medium format but the Dimage
Scan Multi, the Dimage Scan Multi II, and the Dimage Scan Multi Pro which
scan medium format films. Minolta's model naming system can get very
confusing with like sounding and looking names. The Dimage Scan II, I
believ
I understanbd completely and was just pulling your leg.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mark Otway
Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 3:46 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Filmscanners: OT: E-mail virus
>> While it inde
While it indeed may be more sensible for the ISP to maintain a virus
checking operation on all messages coming into and going out of their ISP,
your ISP also, evidently, seems to work under the assumption that
redundancy insures that the message will get through and sends out multiple
copies of
>But they grumbled about how I should have a lead lined pouch.
Sort of funny in a way. I fail to see how a lead lined bag would help
matters since it would prevent the film from being x-rayed and would
necessitate a hand check anyway. How would that be any different that
putting the film in a b
> Fed-X apparently no longer guarantees x-ray free travel for film, either.
That maybe because Fed-X has an arrangement with the US Postal Service
whereby it carries all the USPS's airmail (which is virtually all the USPS
mail) from destination to destination; thus, they are obliged to impose the
2/01 10:34 PM, LAURIE SOLOMON at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> Actually, both must be set up on the same IDE channel as masters.
>
> How does one do that? I thought that you could only have one master
device
> per channel; and it was the one that was connected to the end of the
ribbon
&
>What was truly astonishing was the fact that
>the tiny 35mm transparency, though magnified an incredible 516 times,
>retained sharpness. A very impressive testimonial to the quality of Leica
>lenses and photographer Ernst Haas. The camera: Leicaflex SL with Summicron
>50mm lens".
Also quite poss
and images
on 11/12/01 12:22 AM, LAURIE SOLOMON at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> To Preben:
>
> Thanks for your response and patience. The Abit board does permit JBOD;
but
> it does not provide RAID 5 as you have noted. When I asked about what
> appeared to be a contradiction between
al Message -----
From: "LAURIE SOLOMON" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, November 11, 2001 7:53 PM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Best solution for HD and images
> Preben,
> Since you seem to be knowledgeable about IDE RAID matters, I wish to make
>
Preben,
Since you seem to be knowledgeable about IDE RAID matters, I wish to make
use of your knowledge as a resource even if it is OT for this list. I
recently bought an ABIT motherboard with RAID. The manual is not very clear
as tot he difference between RAID 0 (striping) and what it does vers
Caere Omnipage is a page scanning application using OCR where in text is
rendered editable and uses on a PC the twain driver of one's scanning
software to scan in a page of text; its cousin, Omniform, is a page scanning
application for scanning in or designing forms which are capable of being
fil
There
could be a number of reasons. First every time you open a file in
Photoshop, a duplicate working file is opened in memory; if there were no such
duplicate file one would not be able to have a "revert to" feature and maybe not
even a history pallet. All adjustments and changes are mad
Since in reality these are really very different operations, I fail to see
first how any comparison between the two is possible at all (apples and
oranges) and second what definition and criteria of "destructive" is being
used and with respect to what objective.
If one rescales without resampling
>Does the license allow me to do that? Usually OEM software bundled with
hardware
>doesn't allow that so I'm not sure in this case.
Usually all software (bundled or not) allow one to give away the software,
or in some cases even resell it, as long as certain conditions are met. The
main provision
A recent issue of a Publisher Perfection catalog, which tends to be on the
high side regarding prices, listed it at, I believe, around $2900 plus.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Shough, Dean
Sent: Friday, September 14, 2001 1:28 PM
To: '
>So why are the rules for artists different
That is the point they are not different. The creation is the embodiment of
the artists talent, skills, creative powers, knowledge, and services (or if
you will the carrier of the artists conception). It is the conception which
is an expression of tho
201 - 300 of 628 matches
Mail list logo
