gt; trickle down to me and I should be able to take a little longer if
> needed. Is this correct?
>
> Thanks.
>
> Paul Wilson
>
Paul,
How many dealers are going to give you your money back or give you a
replacement pending Polaroid's Bankruptcy?
Ray Amos
For your information. Copied from a post to the EOS usergroup from B&H
Photo. Enjoy. Ray Amos
***
Read http://public.wsj.com/news/businessbox/article1.html from the Wall
Street Journal about Polaroid's financial difficulties. The article says
r, which included
the software. That's like saying that your dishes are not yours because
you did not make them. Or your vacuum cleaner is not yours because you
did not make it.
'Nuf said by me. No more word games. I'll not respond to any public
replies. If you want to e-mail me personally, fine.
Ray Amos
you
calling it garbage either. Nothing I can do about that though. If you
live within 100 miles of Greensboro, NC I would be willing to drive to
your home or office and try to help you solve your problems.
Ray Amos
river or should I have a newer version for 3.1? If I should be using
an updated driver, where can I find it? Thanks.
Ray Amos
Friends,
I have searched the Nikon USA website and cannot find the upgrade from
3.0 to 3.1. Can anyone tell me where to find the upgrade? Thanks.
Ray Amos
will they do that NikonScan 3.1 won't do? Thanks.
Ray Amos
aking mostly for images already taken that cannot
be recomposed. I now try to allow for the loss of edges. Ray Amos
edient in the overall image". The
down side is the size doubles. PS converts it from 14-bits to 16-bits.
My scans are a little over 100 MB and if you try to compress them using
Photoshop's LZW compression, the size actually increases. Instead of a
30 MB compressed file you end up with a 110 MB non-compressed file.
Ray Amos
Paul Chefurka wrote:
> > If I got a 4000 desktop scanner of my own it would need to produce
> > about ten fully finished scans per hour to be worth considering. Is
> > this possible considering the amount of time that dust busting might
> > take?
>
> IME with the Polaroid 4000, absolutely not. I
Every scan from the first to the last has
been perfect. BTW, you won't believe the colors when using the 14-bit
mode. It doubles your file size but triples your pleasure.
Ray Amos
It seems that Vuescan has taken over this usergroup. Maybe it should be
renamed Vuescan instead of filmscanners. Ray Amos
te file to me. I've installed it but have no idea what it does.
Ray Amos
The new Canon FS4000US has a dynamic range of 3.4. The Nikon 4000 ED
has a dynamic range of 4.2. Wonder if they measure the same way?
Ray Amos
rs of printing unless immediately placed behind glass in
> frames or under Mylar in albums.
Laurie, I'll bet you can't speak the above sentence without taking a
breath. Ray Amos
more computing power, you're right again. No reason to
> run out and plop down money just to make good 8x10's, but I want to see how
> large I can print without using my view camera. So I'm the exception. I'll
> spend a few thousand bucks to see what it will do for me.
>
> Bob Kehl
I couldn't have said it better. Ray Amos
point is - NOTHING CHANGES.
>
> Won't the 12bit a/d converter allow the information between 4mv and the 1mv noise
>level to be resolved?
>
> Colin Maddock
Is there anyone out there other than the participants who has any idea
what they are saying?
Ray Amos
17 matches
Mail list logo
