I believe some scanners (SS4000/A4000T) do not position themselves too
well
for multipass - so this is of limited use. I just tried 8x MP with the
artixscan 4000 and there are echos in the image. The result is pretty
useless.
I just tried 8x with long exposure (for completeness) and there
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 1:41 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: VueScan Long Exposure Pass
The problem with the Long exposure pass option is that most people won't
see the problem areas until they've scanned hundreds of
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, May 04, 2001 7:55 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: VueScan Long Exposure Pass
In a message dated 5/4/2001 11:06:17 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
writes:
What about a slightly underexposed slide (this can
I previously mentioned that I had been suffering some problems with noise
with the artixscan 4000.
I have been trying to scan (with both Silverfast and Scan Wizard Pro) a
slide that is high contrast that looks great when projected.
I have been unable to get a usable scan particularly in the
From: Hemingway, David J [EMAIL PROTECTED]
With our SS4000 the manufacturer originally was going to use a
particular CCD because they had a relationship with the manufacturer.
Polaroid recognized there were higher quality alternatives, and convinced
the manufacturer to change to a much higher
Under my "general tab" in "system properties" it says my windows version
is
:MS win98 4.10.1998,which as far as i know is 98SE.
Thats WIN98 original. SE is 98.10.A. It says second edition between "MS
Win 98" and the version number.
Cool. Mine is 1.31. Now I just need to decide how to download the 12MB
file. :-P
I assume you are worried about failed downloads.
I recently downloaded a Music CD Database (about 80MB) . Before I started I
downloaded something called Getright from www.download.com . This generally
let's
Hi James
Never used the 1640, but I noticed the UK computer magazine liked it whilst
having a free browse at Smiths.
It was up against some proper film scanners as well as flatbeds. I didn't
read it properly and I am not always too impressed with their reviews. They
may even have preferred it
"Mikael Risedal" [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
VueScan are (also in my opinion for beginners) but if you are concern to
learn how to scan pictures try a "pro software" and see who much
more
you can get out from your negative or slides.
That's a big assumption about how much money people
I have just done some new samples using the latest versions of Vuescan, Scan
Wizard Pro and Silverfast and a new webpage to go with them. All the samples
use Adobe RGB (1998) colour space.
I have noticed that IE5.5 seems to display some of the JPEGs poorly so for a
proper comparison you may have
- Original Message -
From: "Tony Sleep" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 08, 2001 6:18 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: film scanner software
- SilverFast : designed for heavy-duty production use, without any
requirement for Photoshop manipulation. If you
Appologies if this arrives twice.Internet
providerhas been down - I did try using an alternative account but this
appears to have got filtered out by the mailing list server.
Re-writables are a very poor choice for anything
you want to keep long-term as they have relatively very poor
I wouldn't use 700Mb disks for archival as
they are bit like E240 video tapes - the extra storage is provided by pushing
the format to extremes.
I would say however I used to use almost
exclusively 700MB discs in my 10 stack CD player in my previous car. I
experienced no problems over a 2
a good shelf
life, I'm rather surprised that they are not considered trustworthy.
Art
Steve Greenbank wrote:
Appologies if this arrives twice. Internet provider has been down - I
did try using an alternative account but this appears to have got
filtered out by the mailing list server.
Hi everyone
I'm back.
Last time I spent quite some time complaining about how Silverfast would
lock your machine if you had anything on your PC IDE controllers other than
Hard disk drives and CD ROMs. So its time to redress the balance.
I would like to congratulate them on fixing the problem.
I have Silverfast Ai and IT8 (supplied with the Artixscan 4000) and with
this software it is possible to output HDR scans which are the raw data.
I think that the best scans to archive are the raw files. As later you can
return to these and use new better processing techniques become available
Reading Ian lyons very helpful tutorial "Silverfast 5 and the Polaroid
SS4000 : Part 1 - Basic steps to IT-8 calibration", I found he used a value
of 10 for lamp lightness. He noted that this allowed him to maximise shadow
detail.
Sounds good to me, but how do I know what value would be good for
From what I saw on Steve's Digicams the new Nikon looks amazing. Does it
really automatically produce such imaculate scans from what can be best
described as well worn originals ?
I have never completely got the hang of removing flaws in PS and it just
takes me forever (around a hour) - it's
There are two issues involved scanning head speed and data transfer speed.
Unless you have dual interfaces it would be difficult to tell if the
scanning head is held back by a slower interface.
If you consiser a full resolution scan of A4 you get approx
11(inch)*8(inch)*2400*4800*6(16 bit
101 - 119 of 119 matches
Mail list logo
