]
Subject: RE: (O) SS4K Shadow noise
It's disappointing to hear that you get this much shadow noise using
the SS4000...I'm looking to move up from the HP Photosmart S20 for this
very reason. I wonder if the multiple scanning feature of Silverfast
software (now bundled with the SS4000
Did you use the multisampling feature in Vuescan? Did you compare the results using
Insight software?
--Evan Anderson
From: "Steve Jones" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Fri, 20 Oct 2000 14:14:51 +0100
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: (O) SS4K Shadow noise
8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Priority: 3 (Normal)
X-MSMail-Priority: Normal
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 8.5, Build 4.71.2173.0
Importance: Normal
In-Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V4.72.3110.3
X-UIDL: 8bb634784d87bc67cb39cff84be0258b
Subject: RE: (
r-encoding: 7bit
X-UIDL: c8d2b5a5b9ad35f618263ebc9aafb5be
Subject: Re: (O) SS4K Shadow noise
I have to agree with David. I shoot a lot of contrasty florals against
black and darkly colored velvet. The shadows and dark blacks are the
least
of my problems. The solid black backgrounds are alwa
, Ron
- Original Message -
From: "bjs" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2000 5:27 PM
Subject: Re: (O) SS4K Shadow noise
- Original Message -
From: "Johnny Deadman" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Filmscanners" [EMA
And for a totally opposite conclusion read this review:
http://www.pcphotomag.com/content/pastissues/2000/july/scanner.html
Polaroid appear to still be shipping Insight 3.5 on CD, to judge from
email I get, and this is what they seem to have tested with here ('non
TWAIN'). It has plenty of
Oct 2000 01:10 +0100 (BST)
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tony Sleep)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: (O) SS4K Shadow noise
A non-problem: the 4000 is virtually noise free with any reasonable black
point setting and a more-or-less correctly exposed orginal. Whatever
Anderson
Date: Tue, 13 Jun 2000 14:32:12 -0400
From: glenn mclaughlin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Filmscannerslist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: (O) SS4K Shadow noise
I have noticed on some of my scans (maybe all but more noticeable on some
than others) in the dense shadow
PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: (O) SS4K Shadow noise
It's disappointing to hear that you get this much shadow noise using the
SS4000...I'm looking to move up from the HP Photosmart S20 for this very
reason. I wonder if the multiple scanning feature of Silverfast software
(now bundled
on 18/10/00 5:31 pm, Hemingway, David J at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The SS4000 does very well in the shadows as reported by several reviews and
particapants of this list who use or review the SS4000.
The following is from a review by Bruce Fraser:
The dynamic range of 3.4 seems
It's disappointing to hear that you get this much shadow noise using
the SS4000...I'm looking to move up from the HP Photosmart S20 for this
very reason. I wonder if the multiple scanning feature of Silverfast
software (now bundled with the SS4000) can get rid of most
of this noise?
A
- Original Message -
From: "Johnny Deadman" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: "Filmscanners" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 18, 2000 4:00 PM
Subject: Re: (O) SS4K Shadow noise
Hemingway, David J at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The SS4000 does very well in the
12 matches
Mail list logo
