PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Anthony Atkielski
Sent: Saturday, April 13, 2002 11:58 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Re:GRAIN/ICE SHOWDOWN: Nikon
LS8000vs.MinoltaScanMulti Pro!
Alex writes:
I was wondering why people continue to
complain heavily about Nikon Scan after
ver. 3.1.2
It appears to me so far that it also doesn't run in original Win98 (not SE).
Dave
- Original Message -
From: Alex Zabrovsky [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2002 6:39 AM
Subject: [filmscanners] RE: Re:GRAIN/ICE SHOWDOWN: Nikon
LS8000vs.MinoltaScanMulti Pro
out to understand usage of UI of Nikon Scan).
Regards,
Alex Z
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of John Bradbury
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 6:52 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Re:GRAIN/ICE SHOWDOWN: Nikon
.
With 3.1.2 the problem has been rectified. And, touch wood, NikonScan...
just hums along... BTW am using W2K Pro.
SD
- Original Message -
From: Anthony Atkielski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 14, 2002 3:27 AM
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Re:GRAIN/ICE SHOWDOWN
Mark writes:
Vuescan also has a fairly poor interface ...
True, but I believe that's because Ed spends his time getting the product to
do what it is supposed to do, and getting it to do it well. Therefore, like
you, I'm willing to overlook the less-than-perfect interface. It does
conform to
- Original Message -
From: Anthony Atkielski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 12, 2002 2:26 PM
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Re:GRAIN/ICE SHOWDOWN: Nikon
LS8000vs.MinoltaScanMulti Pro!
3.1.2 doesn't sound like a first revision to me. In any case, it gets
Norm writes:
The Nikon 3.1 is about as inept a piece of
software as I have ever used. Non intuitive
system with windows and controls scattered
about without any apparent logic.
As far as I can tell, Nikon Scan was designed and written by high-school
students. Nobody else would be
