I notice on the Minolta compatibility chart, the following footnotes
regarding use of the Scan Dual IV with Mac OS-X:
*3:You must be logged on as an administrator to complete the driver
installation.
*4:The Mac OS X plug-in cannot be used with applications that are not OS X
native.
Since it is
Carlisle,
Thanks for amplifying my answer, yours is so much clearer and sensible. I
recognize that I was assuming that everyone knows Unix to some degree, even
though I also know that isn't true.
Brad
Berry,
To amplify Brad's answer:
When you first set up your Mac under OSX, you create
Brad,
My pleasure!
I only know enough Unix to be dangerous...but I *do* know macs!
8*)
Carlisle
Carlisle,
Thanks for amplifying my answer, yours is so much clearer and sensible. I
recognize that I was assuming that everyone knows Unix to some degree, even
though I also know that isn't
I can only answer half your question, but I have some idea of the
changes that Minolta made between the two.
In it's time, the Minolta SD2 was considered good value, however, it was
not without its flaws. They had a problem with quality control which
led to what I coined lazy sensors which meant
on 9/11/04 6:43 AM, Arthur Entlich at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I can only answer half your question, but I have some idea of the
changes that Minolta made between the two.
In it's time, the Minolta SD2 was considered good value, however, it was
not without its flaws. They had a problem with
I'm only a neophyte at this but I never noticed any of the problems
mentioned with my SD2. I am very happy with it for the price. It
sounds like significant improvements have been made though, so the SD4
sounds like the better deal.
-- al
, September 11, 2004 8:31 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Scan Dual IV vs Scan Dual II
Berry Ives wrote: Okay, does anyone have experience on both the
Minolta SD2 and SD4? If so, please share that with me. I've read the
specs already.
I don't usually do Me
LAURIE SOLOMON wrote: Preston, I have to wonder if time were money
if you would actually save a whole lot by using dICE since using it
often slows down the scan speed a great deal. If one cleaned one's film
and dust out of the scanner, would one have to spend more than a minimal
amount of time
Preston,
At one time I had all my color negatives ( and BW, I use XP2) done at one
hour labs and I spent a lot of time spotting - I don't like the dust removal
programs (I've tried various instances) as it reduces the sharpness of the
image - I already feel that I am not able to truly use the
