[filmscanners] Re: Digital Darkroom Computer Builders?

2002-10-23 Thread Robert Michael
The Web may rely in RBG displays but most materials found on the web at some point is downloaded and printed to hardcover by a goodly number of people. Most bureaucrates and business people demand hardcopies of everything for safety reasons and as backup which is why the paperless society

[filmscanners] Re: Digital Darkroom Computer Builders?

2002-10-23 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Laurie writes: You may be right that it is a common practice; but that does not mean that it cannot come back to bite Microsoft. The likelihood that it will come back to bite Microsoft is no greater than the likelihood that it will come back to bite any other company that has been doing it,

[filmscanners] Re: Digital Darkroom Computer Builders?

2002-10-23 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Andras writes: Yes, but it's only Microsoft whose products I'm forced to use almost every day ... You are actually required to use a lot of products with similar practices every day, you just aren't aware of it. Have you checked the margins on Motorola and Intel microprocessors lately? Do

[filmscanners] Re: Digital Darkroom Computer Builders?

2002-10-23 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Robert writes: But these people don't want any color anyway, and maybe not even greyscale ... Look around you, and count the percentage of printed material that contains nothing other than black and white. Color is being used more than ever before.

[filmscanners] RE: Digital Darkroom Computer Builders?

2002-10-23 Thread Austin Franklin
Hi Paul, ...However, even in 8-bit mode, having a 10-bit DAC is useful because it keeps the color lookup table curves from introducing posterization through round-off errors. If it's 8 bit data, you are feeding the DAC only 8 bits, if you are using a 10 bit DAC, then the lower two bits are

[filmscanners] RE: Digital Darkroom Computer Builders?

2002-10-23 Thread Austin Franklin
... Anthony's claim that handling more memory than an individual instruction can access is both innefficient and difficult is wrong on both counts. Try processing tables that straddle address-space boundaries, and you'll see. Anthony, I don't know who wrote what program you believe

[filmscanners] RE: Digital Darkroom Computer Builders?

2002-10-23 Thread Austin Franklin
Hi David, 'Doze, Anthony's claim that handling more memory than an individual instruction can access is both innefficient and difficult is wrong on both counts. Accessing the whole of the address space from every instruction is hideously inefficient. Most machines provide modes where a base

[filmscanners] RE: Digital Darkroom Computer Builders?

2002-10-23 Thread Laurie Solomon
or profitable. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:filmscanners_owner;halftone.co.uk]On Behalf Of Anthony Atkielski Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 6:09 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Digital Darkroom Computer Builders? Laurie writes: You may be right

[filmscanners] Re: Digital Darkroom Computer Builders?

2002-10-23 Thread Major A
Sure, but this is merely a software question really. Once the software is in place, it behaves like hardware. Contrary to common myth, even though software is not hardwired into a machine, it is extraordinarily difficult to change, especially when loaded into hundreds of millions of

[filmscanners] RE: Digital Darkroom Computer Builders?

2002-10-23 Thread Laurie Solomon
DAC in terms of rounding off errors - if I understood his comments correctly. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:filmscanners_owner;halftone.co.uk]On Behalf Of Paul D. DeRocco Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 2:12 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [filmscanners] RE: Digital

[filmscanners] Re: Digital Darkroom Computer Builders?

2002-10-23 Thread Major A
Also, 64 bits take us to the physical limits of semiconductors ... How? As I said: 2^64 = 18446744073709551616. That's how much RAM can be directly addressed using 64-bit address registers. Compare this to roughly 10^23 silicon atoms in a large die like a CPU or RAM chip. That is the bulk

[filmscanners] Re: Digital Darkroom Computer Builders?

2002-10-23 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Austin writes: I don't know who wrote what program you believe supports your claim ... Any program that exhausts the direct address space, and unfortunately those programs become more and more common as an architecture grows older. As you aren't a hardware engineer, it makes sense that you

[filmscanners] RE: Digital Darkroom Computer Builders?

2002-10-23 Thread Paul D. DeRocco
The video card includes a 256-entry lookup table (for each color) which gets loaded with a gamma correction curve (e.g., by Adobe Gamma Loader). Assuming that table doesn't just have a straight line in it, some values will be squeezed together, creating duplicates, and other values will be spread

[filmscanners] RE: Digital Darkroom Computer Builders?

2002-10-23 Thread Paul D. DeRocco
The x86 chips have a 46-bit segmented address space which funnels into a 32-bit virtual address space, which then expands into a paged physical address space which is somewhat larger, depending upon the chip. The only OS that exploits segmentation that I'm aware of is Intel's iRMX. Windows and all

[filmscanners] Re: Digital Darkroom Computer Builders?

2002-10-23 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Andras writes: No. Applications get memory from the operating system kernel. No, they do not. In many systems, applications have free run of an entire virtual address space, or nearly so, and can waste it to their heart's content. I've seen mainframe systems crash after a few weeks when

[filmscanners] Re: Digital Darkroom Computer Builders?

2002-10-23 Thread
From: Major A [EMAIL PROTECTED] Also, 64 bits take us to the physical limits of semiconductors ... How? As I said: 2^64 = 18446744073709551616. That's how much RAM can be directly addressed using 64-bit address registers. Compare this to roughly 10^23 silicon atoms in a large die

[filmscanners] RE: Digital Darkroom Computer Builders?

2002-10-23 Thread Paul D. DeRocco
From what I can tell from Coloreal's web site, it's just another poor-man's calibrator, like Adobe Gamma or Colorific (with trivial extensions for multi-head video cards). If you don't have a colorimeter, that's as good as you can do. Of course, there's no such thing as accurate Internet color

[filmscanners] RE: Digital Darkroom Computer Builders?

2002-10-23 Thread Laurie Solomon
Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2002 5:10 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Digital Darkroom Computer Builders? The Web may rely in RBG displays but most materials found on the web at some point is downloaded and printed to hardcover by a goodly number of people. Most bureaucrates

[filmscanners] RE: Digital Darkroom Computer Builders?

2002-10-23 Thread Austin Franklin
Anthohy, As you aren't a hardware engineer, it makes sense that you don't understand how this works, and the real issues involved. I've known exactly how it works for several decades now. Oh really? Austin

[filmscanners] RE: Digital Darkroom Computer Builders?

2002-10-23 Thread Austin Franklin
Hi Paul, Yes, passing the 8 bit data through an 8 bit LUT would cause gaps/combining in anything but a linear/monotonic LUT (1:1)...it simply has to, which is the same reason to do tonal manipulations in a larger space. The video card includes a 256-entry lookup table (for each color) which

[filmscanners] Re: Digital Darkroom Computer Builders?

2002-10-23 Thread Anthony Atkielski
Petru writes: Clearly, these guys (myself included) must be idiots. One need not be an idiot to make mistakes. And we have been like that for years, it seems. The problem has existed since time immemorial. Apparently engineers, as a class, have difficulty in visualizing future evolution;

[filmscanners] RE: Digital Darkroom Computer Builders?

2002-10-23 Thread Austin Franklin
Hi Paul, Obviously, this isn't the case in the 64-bit versions of Windows for the Alpha... Er, I don't believe there is a 64 bit Windows for Alpha... Austin Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with

[filmscanners] Re: Digital Darkroom Computer Builders?

2002-10-23 Thread Robert Logan
Anthony Atkielski wrote: Exactly the same thing was said of 32 bits, and 16 bits, and even 8 bits no doubt. Engineers _always_ get it wrong, and they _always_ refuse to believe that they should build in more capacity for the future. I doubt that, what was probably said was, ok, we can

[filmscanners] RE: Digital Darkroom Computer Builders?

2002-10-23 Thread Austin Franklin
Anthony, The mistake engineers make is in believing that address spaces will be allocated sequentially starting with byte zero and ending with byte 2^N-1. But that's not how it actually works. Engineers tend to assume that a given address space has more space than anyone will ever need and

[filmscanners] Re: Digital Darkroom Computer Builders?

2002-10-23 Thread Major A
Change the kernel, and applications have access to more memory. Up to the limit of the pointer and/or size variables used. If your code Yes, sorry for not explicitly repeating that. If you (not you specifically) understand how virtual memory works, and how memory is allocated in a lot

[filmscanners] Re: Digital Darkroom Computer Builders?

2002-10-23 Thread Major A
AND! after watching the Greatest Briton program which looked at the work of Isambard Kingdom Brunel, I cannot believe you are referring to Engineers in such a way :) I regularly travel through his 1st tunnel (Wapping 1839), which has stood the test of being built for foot, and now carries

[filmscanners] RE: Digital Darkroom Computer Builders?

2002-10-23 Thread Laurie Solomon
, 2002 1:30 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [filmscanners] RE: Digital Darkroom Computer Builders? From what I can tell from Coloreal's web site, it's just another poor-man's calibrator, like Adobe Gamma or Colorific (with trivial extensions for multi-head video cards). If you don't have

[filmscanners] RE: Digital Darkroom Computer Builders?

2002-10-23 Thread Paul D. DeRocco
I think they played around with it internally, before the Itanium was out. But you're right that there's no such thing available right now. -- Ciao, Paul D. DeRocco Paulmailto:pderocco;ix.netcom.com From: Austin Franklin Er, I don't believe there is a 64 bit

[filmscanners] RE: Digital Darkroom Computer Builders?

2002-10-23 Thread Paul D. DeRocco
In the real world, what winds up in the video card's lookup table is a gentle curve whose slope probably remains well between 0.5 and 2. If anyone can see the faint posterization that comes from having a 256x8 table under any circumstances (and I never have), adding two fractional bits would

[filmscanners] RE: Digital Darkroom Computer Builders?

2002-10-23 Thread Paul D. DeRocco
The 64-bit WinXP is called Windows XP 64-bit Edition and it's a separate product. There is also a 64-bit version of Win2K Advanced Server called Windows Advanced Server, Limited Edition. According to the Microsoft Developers Network web site, you can't run 32-bit Windows on an Itanium because at