Date sent: Sat, 20 Nov 2004 15:12:13 -0600
Send reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Laurie Solomon [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:[filmscanners] RE: Genuine fractals?
I use the program frequently
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Myles
Sent: Thursday, November 25, 2004 10:18 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Genuine fractals?
Date sent: Sat, 20 Nov 2004 15:12:13 -0600
Send reply to: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Laurie
to do with the dpi setting recorded in a digital camera file.
Jawed
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of LAURIE SOLOMON
Sent: 25 November 2004 17:36
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [filmscanners] RE: Genuine fractals?
Well, I do
LAURIE SOLOMON wrote: Well, I do not own that camera and am not familiar
with it; but I assume that if you look in the manual you will find that you
can capture your images at around 300 dpi and save them to a tiff format;
but capturing them at a high resolution around 300 dpi as a RAW file would
:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Jawed Ashraf
Sent: Thursday, November 25, 2004 12:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [filmscanners] RE: Genuine fractals?
The dpi setting of a digital camera file is utterly irrelevant here.
Different cameras output their files (no matter their format) at fixed dpi
printing press for puting on the
refrigerator, greeting cards, displaying on a wall, or for publication).
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Preston Earle
Sent: Thursday, November 25, 2004 12:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [filmscanners] RE
Put simply, you're confused by the way that certain software applications
(e.g. Photoshop or scanner software such as Nikon View) allow the user to
specify the pixel-dimensions of a destination image by specifying dpi and
linear dimensions (in units that are not pixels - e.g. by requesting an 8
From: LAURIE SOLOMON
Preston, technically you are correct in saying failes do not have
resolution
and even in saying that their contents do not either; but standard non-RAW
file formats do contain metadata which furnish rendering
instructions which
tell the program to render the 3000x2100
Sorry, the two images are:
http://www.pbase.com/pderocco/image/36593399
http://www.pbase.com/pderocco/image/36593400
--
Ciao, Paul D. DeRocco
Paulmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Paul D. DeRocco [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've posted a pair of examples, both involving blowing up by 10x a small
piece of an image that had some architectural edges as well as some non-edge
detail. You can see what I mean:
http://www.pbase.com/pderocco/image/36593399
Paul,
Help me with the math here. What would be the final dimension of the image
whose snippet you are displaying here? And for reference, your 10D captures
an image of about 3K pixels on the long dimension, right?
Stan Schwartz
Paul wrote:
I've posted a pair of examples, both involving
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [filmscanners] RE: Genuine fractals?
From: Laurie Solomon
Yes, the tests were done prior to PSCS and I know of none done
since. I am
not sure if Adobe made significant improvements to the basic Bicubic
formulation as much as they made its implementation more
From: LAURIE SOLOMON
Again I have no complaint with your description of the
differences between
GF and Bicubic and potential artifacts and byproducts of each. I
looked at
your two examples and for the life of me I cannot see any
differnces between
them and do not see the artificial
From: Stan Schwartz
Help me with the math here. What would be the final dimension of the image
whose snippet you are displaying here? And for reference, your
10D captures
an image of about 3K pixels on the long dimension, right?
The 10D is 3072x2048. The magnification in both those test
I use the program frequently; and find that for most upsampling within the
normal ranges, it is not all that much different from Photoshop's Bicubic
methods. It is in the extreme ranges of upsampling that the difference may
begin to appe arandGFmaybegintoshine.
What I do not understand is,
On 20/11/04 13:12, Laurie Solomon [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I use the program frequently; and find that for most upsampling within the
normal ranges, it is not all that much different from Photoshop's Bicubic
methods. It is in the extreme ranges of upsampling that the difference may
begin to
As it happens, I can get a pretty good 8X10 from such a file, but
then I go to 12X18 (if I can live with no cropping),
Well, I did a commercial job using as an experiemnt a point and shoot 4.3Mp
Nikon Coolpix camera captured at maximium resolution of 240ppi into a TIFF
format just to see what
From: Brad Davis
Anybody using Genuine Fractals as a way to up sample images? My scanner
provides very high resolution compared to my (current) digital camera, but
there are times when I have taken an image with the digital camera that I
would like to enlarge. I've had some success with
Paul, thanks, that's a useful piece of information.
Brad
On 20/11/04 17:44, Paul D. DeRocco [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
From: Brad Davis
Anybody using Genuine Fractals as a way to up sample images? My scanner
provides very high resolution compared to my (current) digital camera, but
there
Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Paul D. DeRocco
Sent: Saturday, November 20, 2004 7:44 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [filmscanners] RE: Genuine fractals?
From: Brad Davis
Anybody using Genuine Fractals as a way to up sample images? My scanner
From: LAURIE SOLOMON [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have even seen comparisions of sections of 35mm images blown
up to billboard size by GF and Photoshop where GF has come out ahead in
terms of lower numbers of artifacts and averaging errors.
Just to clarify, though... this refers to pre-CS versions of PS
as evidence that the GF limits do not stop at upsamplings of lower than 4 or
5 X.
- Original Message -
From: Ed Verkaik [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, November 21, 2004 12:15 AM
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Genuine fractals?
From: LAURIE SOLOMON [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I have
From: Laurie Solomon
Yes, the tests were done prior to PSCS and I know of none done
since. I am
not sure if Adobe made significant improvements to the basic Bicubic
formulation as much as they made its implementation more sophisticated by
furnishing two subtle variations on the basic
Given an earlier long tread about Genuine Fractals, I hope this is
not considered too OT.
Anyone who might have received the subject program as a bundle and
didn't install and register it care to sell it?
Thank you,
Ebert STeele
24 matches
Mail list logo
