- Original Message -
From: ThomasH [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The race against our old good 35mm film is on
and it will not stop till the film will be gone.
Buddy you may not know it
but you are a kind of a poet
and you have a lot of things you want to say..
When your gloomy
I surely
The problem with flatness of the CCD and CMOS sensors dictated even
modifications in lens design.
How does lense design help solve this? The light rays come from what ever
angle they come from, and I don't believe lense design can do anything to
help. This issue is only pertinent with wider
Austin Franklin wrote:
The problem with flatness of the CCD and CMOS sensors dictated even
modifications in lens design.
How does lense design help solve this? The light rays come from what ever
angle they come from, and I don't believe lense design can do anything to
help. This issue
, magnification, etc. Only the field of view is
reduced.
izzet
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Les Berkley
Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2002 3:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [filmscanners] RE: Nikon D100
Hi!
I'll settle for 8 MP (maybe
From: Austin Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [filmscanners] RE: Nikon D100
Date: Sun, 24 Feb 2002 12:10:34 -0500
One more issue is the chromatic abberation problem and 100% sharpness out
in the corners with a 24 x 36 ccd.
There are also
- Original Message -
From: Wilson, Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, February 22, 2002 3:16 PM
Subject: [filmscanners] RE: Nikon D100
Can anyone explain just why manufacturers seem unable to produce a full
36x24mm CCD sensor
Dickbo wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Wilson, Paul [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Can anyone explain just why manufacturers seem unable to produce a full
36x24mm CCD sensor.
One known problem is that the light being off center has an increasing
entry angle, what works fine with conventional
3:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [filmscanners] RE: Nikon D100
Hi!
I'll settle for 8 MP (maybe...) but they'll have to give me
24x36 mm (or
close) sensor. I really don't want my 18-35 zoom turning into
a 32-65 or whatever
- Original Message -
From: izzet [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 23, 2002 9:02 AM
Subject: [filmscanners] RE: Nikon D100
Well, actually your 18-35 zoom is not turning into anything, it is still
18-35 regarding dof, magnification, etc. Only the field
Op's wrote:
Contax N Digital. is another SLR this has a full frame sensor 6.29 Mp.
http://www.contaxcameras.com/
They have a funny press announce design error: They enumerate
the features and the first in the list is:
1. 6 Mega Pixel...
what looks in the proportional font almost like
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of
Julian Vrieslander
Subject: [filmscanners] Nikon D100
Nikon announces its prosumer 6MP digital SLR. Price rumored
to be under $2k.
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0202/02022105nikond100.asp
I wonder why Canon is lagging so far behind other major
Err, what other manufacturers? The only companies currently selling digial
SLR's are Nikon, Canon, Kodak and Fuji. Out the D-SLR's made by these
companies, the D-30 is the cheapest.
Paul Wilson
-Original Message-
From: Enoch's Vision, Inc. (Cary Enoch R...)
I wonder why Canon is
Err, what other manufacturers? The only companies currently selling digial
SLR's are Nikon, Canon, Kodak and Fuji. Out the D-SLR's made by these
companies, the D-30 is the cheapest.
I wonder why Canon is lagging so far behind other major
manufacturers in
this area (price/performance,
13 matches
Mail list logo
