[filmscanners] Re: OT: Film Recorders

2002-01-04 Thread Op's
Mike Kersenbrock wrote: Op's wrote: David Since you asked I have now gone to XP and can't get my 8K printer to work with it. Raster plus 2.0.6b. Is there a patch? Can't find one. I've a lowly CI-5000s printer, and installed that program into XP. I haven't tried real film,

[filmscanners] RE: OT: Film Recorders

2002-01-03 Thread Hemingway, David J
:[filmscanners] Re: OT: Film Recorders David Since you asked I have now gone to XP and can't get my 8K printer to work with it. Raster plus 2.0.6b. Is there a patch? Can't find one. I now have it connected to my old P350 PC under ME but want to have it running on my current PC with XP. Thanks Rob

[filmscanners] Re: OT: Film Recorders

2002-01-02 Thread Op's
] Re: OT: Film Recorders If you are on a budget, and willing to experiment, and suffer the quality consequenses, you can photograph your screen. I have recently seen a slide show where scanned slides were digitally manipulated, then photographed from screen. I don't know what the screen

[filmscanners] Re: OT: Film Recorders

2001-12-29 Thread Barbara Nitz
If you are on a budget, and willing to experiment, and suffer the quality consequenses, you can photograph your screen. I have recently seen a slide show where scanned slides were digitally manipulated, then photographed from screen. I don't know what the screen resolution was. When only

[filmscanners] Re: OT: Film Recorders

2001-12-29 Thread Op's
There is a big difference between screen resolution of 1200x 800 and having a 4000x2700 pixel slide from a 4k film printer (or 8200x5500 pixels off an 8k one). The earlier Film printers were not much with there small tubes (The current Polaroids have 7 tubes) Compared to the screen the film