[filmscanners] Re: Scanning chromogenic

2002-02-03 Thread Arthur Entlich
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Converting a colour original to greyscale is a whole different ballgame, as messing with the proportion of R, G or B has the same sort of effect as coloured filters with monochrome film - eg the red channel looks pseudo-IR, you can darken skies by reducing the

[filmscanners] Re: Scanning chromogenic

2002-02-02 Thread Arthur Entlich
Just for clarification, because I was not aware of this: 1) In the case of a film scanner, if one sets the scanner driver to black and white film, and it scans in greyscale, is there a standard method this is accomplished? In other words, does it only use the green channel to create the scan or

[filmscanners] Re: Scanning chromogenic

2002-02-02 Thread Arthur Entlich
Then what happens when an image scanned in colour is desaturated in Photoshop and printed with colour inks. Epson do say, as you mentioned also, that by printing in this manor gives a smoother gradient. By keeping the scan colour RGB and desaturating it there is more information kept than

[filmscanners] Re: Scanning chromogenic (for Ed Hamrick)

2002-02-02 Thread Arthur Entlich
Alessandro Pardi wrote: Ed, scan guru, I summon thee. I know you must be very busy with release 7.5, but may I ask you (or anybody else that happens to know the answer) what channels do you get pixels from when media type is set to BW negative? Thanks, Alessandro Pardi A good

[filmscanners] Re: Scanning chromogenic (for Ed Hamrick)

2002-02-02 Thread Arthur Entlich
A-ha.. Now this puts the question as to whether it really matters if one uses a greyscale capture or makes one via Photoshop's desaturation or conversion to greyscale then... If Ed's method is a standard, then most scanners use averaging of the RGB scan when they do a greyscale scan, which I

[filmscanners] RE: Scanning chromogenic

2002-02-02 Thread Laurie Solomon
grayscale. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Arthur Entlich Sent: Saturday, February 02, 2002 4:34 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Scanning chromogenic Just for clarification, because I was not aware of this: 1

[filmscanners] Re: Scanning chromogenic (for Ed Hamrick)

2002-02-02 Thread TonySleep
On Sat, 02 Feb 2002 02:54:28 -0800 Arthur Entlich ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: If Ed's method is a standard, then most scanners use averaging of the RGB scan when they do a greyscale scan, which I suspect is also how Photoshop creates a greyscale mode image from RGB. ISTR PS uses unequal

[filmscanners] Re: Scanning chromogenic

2002-02-02 Thread TonySleep
On Sat, 02 Feb 2002 02:34:19 -0800 Arthur Entlich ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: 1) In the case of a film scanner, if one sets the scanner driver to black and white film, and it scans in greyscale, is there a standard method this is accomplished? I don't know, but have come across scanner s/w

[filmscanners] Re: Scanning chromogenic

2002-02-02 Thread TonySleep
On Sat, 02 Feb 2002 02:49:44 -0800 Arthur Entlich ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: The question I was trying to answer was regarding if there was a difference between the source being desaturated in Photoshop before going to the printer versus taking a color scan and converting it to Greyscale

[filmscanners] RE: Scanning chromogenic

2002-02-01 Thread Alessandro Pardi
Martin, Tony, I've read many times (and seen with my own eyes on my Canon FS4000) that the green channel is the one with least noise and best detail (therefore my workflow for BW, including chromogenic, is to pick the green channel from Vuescan raw files). I understand that keeping also R and B

[filmscanners] Re: Scanning chromogenic

2002-02-01 Thread Arthur Entlich
Op's wrote: Then what happens when an image scanned in colour is desaturated in Photoshop and printed with colour inks. Epson do say, as you mentioned also, that by printing in this manor gives a smoother gradient. By keeping the scan colour RGB and desaturating it there is more

[filmscanners] Re: Scanning chromogenic

2002-01-31 Thread Op's
Anthony J. Terlecki wrote: At the lab you just have to ask them to print it on black and white paper. -- Tony Terlecki And here lies the problem most labs don't carry Chromo BW paper and want to print on colour hence they can't get it right and make a sepia cast to compensate. Rob

[filmscanners] Re: Scanning chromogenic

2002-01-30 Thread TonySleep
On Tue, 29 Jan 2002 22:33:19 -0800 Ken Durling ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: However, nothing I do in Vuescan results in anything but a straight greyscal image, leading me to believe that there's something I don't understand about this film (no surprise). So where does the sepia toning come

[filmscanners] Re: Scanning chromogenic

2002-01-30 Thread Ken Durling
On Wed, 30 Jan 2002 11:28 + (GMT), you wrote: It arises purely out of the filtration used by the lab for C41 printing, and is not a property of the film itself, just a workaround for the fact that it's difficult to get a neutral greyscale print on colour paper with this film. Thanks,

[filmscanners] Re: Scanning chromogenic

2002-01-30 Thread Arthur Entlich
I'm not Tony, but I have a few suggestions. Unlike color photo papers, which are sensitive to color filters and film base color, etc, you have a LOT more control with inkjet printing. There are two ways you can get neutral B+W out of your inkjet printer from chromogenic films. 1) Scan it as a

[filmscanners] Re: Scanning chromogenic

2002-01-30 Thread Anthony J. Terlecki
On Tue, Jan 29, 2002 at 10:33:19PM -0800, Ken Durling wrote: Hi folks - I had never tried any of the C-41 films before, and just shot a roll of XP-2. At the processing place I had them print it on color paper, and the prints have that sepia tone that I associate with the type. However,

[filmscanners] Re: Scanning chromogenic

2002-01-30 Thread Arthur Entlich
One of the reasons these chromogenic C-41 based films were created was so that people could get results without having to get what is now special processing using black and white chemistry, allowing for quick results at any lab offering color neg processing. They have an added advantage of