There's all of what you say, Frank, but the alternative (censorship) is,
I'm afraid, less attractive still. Choice is ours.
Tris
It's amazing -- and sad -- just how often a few of those on this list seem
driven to engage in hair-splitting arguments about anything not seen quite
their way by
I mostly lurk on this list, but I've read many of these ad nauseum threads
here and elsewhere to know what you speak of, and I disagree.
Why so many lists want to rehash the same old newbie questions over and over
I'll never understand. On this list the repetitive mundane might be about
dust, or
On 4/17/02 1:29 PM, Todd Flashner [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Just when did esoterica become so vulgar in this society? Are we only sound
bite able now? If something can't be agreed upon quickly it's wasted time?
Is AGREEMENT better than truth, understanding, and knowledge? Is pleasantry
more
On Wed, 17 Apr 2002 13:59:16 -0400 Lawrence Smith ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
Someone I communicated with off list about
this said they usually try to go off list if there are only 2 or 3
actively
participating in a thread that is clearly going nowhere.
Plan B is of course to start a new
on 4/17/02 2:46 PM, Laurie Solomon wrote:
Todd,
On another list, in a thread similar to this one, (fed up with the
esoterica), the complainer facetiously suggested someone start a list
called
The Noise, where all these less-than-everyday-useful discussions can air
freely, (and I would
Of Todd Flashner
Sent: Wednesday, April 17, 2002 7:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Tiresome Arguments Ad Infinitum
on 4/17/02 2:46 PM, Laurie Solomon wrote:
Todd,
On another list, in a thread similar to this one, (fed up with the
esoterica), the complainer facetiously
