This is true, Ed. The preview does sometimes look very different (but the
end results are worth it).
Maris
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 3:50 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: Autoexposure problem
problem in
Vuescan
This is true, Ed. The preview does sometimes look very different (but the
end results are worth it).
Maris
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, September 20, 2001 3:50 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Re: filmscanners
In a message dated 9/19/2001 6:55:20 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Any suggestions? ISTM the only option is to do a preview which includes the
film mask, then switch to manual exposure, and keep that setting for the
rest of the film (or at least the strip).
Yes, this is exactly what
Rob writes ...
...
The most frustrating thing is that the preview image
looks fine, but I can't find a setting which makes
the final image look anything like the preview.
...
It could be the white balance setting for white% ... try a higher setting
which will allow more white
Similar to what you've tried, check the Advanced Workflow Suggestions in
the Help file to determine the fixed exposure setting for the film - maybe
that will help.
I assume you've already tried the None setting for Color balance.
Have you tried changing the Gamma and Image brightness settings?
Maris wrote:
Similar to what you've tried, check the Advanced Workflow
Suggestions in the Help file to determine the fixed
exposure setting for the film - maybe that will help.
Looks like that's effectively what I've done by including
part of the mask.
I assume you've already tried the None
Ed wrote:
Yes, this is exactly what the Advanced Workflow Suggestions
section of the help file recommends.
Cool. Maybe my recent photos are unusual because most people don't spend
their time photographing lots of planes in bright sky, but I wanted to raise
it in the group so others were aware
