At 01:05 PM 6/16/01 +1000, Rob Geraghty
wrote:
Enoch's Vision, Inc. (Cary Enoch R...) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Has anyone had any problems with NikonScan 3.1 in Windows 2000?
Sounds like Nikonscan 3.1 is worse than 3.0 at least on W2K. Does anyone
know whether 3.1 attempts to fix the jaggies
rafeb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No problems over here with NikonScan 3.1.
Well, at least it works on the 8000. Has anyone tried it on the LS30 or
LS2000?
Are there jaggies?
Rob
-
From: Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, June 16, 2001 7:57 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Frustrating NikonScan 3.1 Problem
rafeb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
No problems over here with NikonScan 3.1.
Well, at least it works on the 8000. Has anyone tried
At 13:05 16-06-01 +1000, Rob Geraghty wrote:
Enoch's Vision, Inc. (Cary Enoch R...) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Has anyone had any problems with NikonScan 3.1 in Windows 2000?
Sounds like Nikonscan 3.1 is worse than 3.0 at least on W2K. Does anyone
know whether 3.1 attempts to fix the jaggies
I had exactly the same problem, the only way to fix it was to re-format
and re-install, not to much tourble for me thank goodness! I didn`t
think it had happened to any one else. I put it down to a program I
installed after Nikon Scan V3.1 that messed the TWAIN up?
Please let me know how
Enoch's Vision, Inc. (Cary Enoch R...) [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Has anyone had any problems with NikonScan 3.1 in Windows 2000?
Sounds like Nikonscan 3.1 is worse than 3.0 at least on W2K. Does anyone
know whether 3.1 attempts to fix the jaggies problem, or is it still reading
data
in 64K