JimD wrote:
Based on the results I'm getting with Provia I'll be using it more,I'll
just teach the dogs to be stationary.
If you can expand your teaching methods to include kids and publish them on
CD or VCR, you'll become a rich man! :-)
Best regards--LRA
Slide film is generally less grainy than print film in scanning sky. Have
you found any good print film for sky?
Maris
- Original Message -
From: JimD [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2001 4:15 PM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Negatives vs. slides in new
Supra 100? Am I missing something?
Tom
P.S. I'm actually not blown away with Supra. I prefer Fuji in my SS4000
Maris wrote:
Slide film is generally less grainy than print film
in scanning sky. Have you found any good print film for sky?
Someone mentioned Supra 400. I wish someone
Michael wrote:
Rob writes ...
Someone mentioned Supra 400. I wish someone would produce
a 100 ASA print film optimised for scanning!
Supra 100 (!?)
It's been claimed here that only Supra 400 is a new formulaiton specifically
optimised for scanning. Supra 100 is apparently a previous
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Negatives vs. slides in new scanners
Michael wrote:
Rob writes ...
Someone mentioned Supra 400. I wish someone would produce
a 100 ASA print film optimised for scanning!
Supra 100 (!?)
It's been claimed here that only Supra 400 is a new formulaiton
-
From: Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 9:05 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Negatives vs. slides in new scanners
, and it scanned fairly well.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: Tom Scales [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, April 30, 2001 7:06 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Negatives vs. slides in new scanners
| Supra 100? Am I missing something?
|
| Tom
|
| P.S. I'm actually not blown away
Edwni wrote:
How cheap is the Fuji? I usually buy 36 exposure Supra 100ASA for about
$2.89 USD. And, once again, it may not be optimized for scanning, but Supra
100ASA scans very well.
I can get Fuji Superia 24 (not 36) for about US$1.50.
Rob
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com
JF Mahony wrote:
i am very interested in negatives vs slides in contrasty situations. i
shoot
a lot of tennis in the middle of the day with provia 100, E200 or fugi
multy
speed. i have an LS-1000 and do have trouble losing the extreme
highlights.
i like the color of slide film better than
to set Vuescan on Clean-heavy to prevent it.
Other than that, in color and exposure it has worked well.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2001 6:57 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Negatives vs. slides in new scanners
Maris wrote:
I have now tried Kodak Supra 400 and, on the LS-30 at 2700spi it scans
better than average but I would not consider it exceptional.
I still have
grain in blue skies and,
My experience with Supra 400 is very good. Very little grain-alliasing no
matter in which channel (skin,
I'm fond of Supra 400 and use it a lot.
Recently I've also been shooting Provia 100F when
there is enough light. These films are apples
and oranges but Supra 400 is real 'chunky' compared to the
Provia. It is interesting to do a max zoom on a 4000 ppi file from
a 35 mm frame to see what the
I'll have to get a Dual II 2820 DPI.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: Vladislav Jurco [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, April 28, 2001 3:18 PM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Negatives vs. slides in new scanners
Maris wrote:
I have now tried Kodak Supra 400
Maris V. Lidaka, Sr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'll have to get a Dual II 2820 DPI.
Vladislav Jurco [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
My experience with Supra 400 is very good. Very little grain-alliasing no
matter in which channel (skin, sky, greens) - especially absence in blue
channel surprised me
]
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Negatives vs. slides in new scanners
Alessandro wrote:
After reading a long thread on photo.net, which finally stated
that, due to Dmax values, low-end scanners work best with
negatives and hi-end with slides, I made my own little test
with my LS-30 by shooting the same
Alessandro Pardi [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
the scene I chose for my test was a *bit* contrasty, still the slide was
well exposed, and details in the shadows were perfectly visible even by
holding up the slide against a window.
I expect that *all* the Nikon scanners will fall down in shadow
i am very interested in negatives vs slides in contrasty situations. i shoot
a lot of tennis in the middle of the day with provia 100, E200 or fugi multy
speed. i have an LS-1000 and do have trouble losing the extreme highlights.
i like the color of slide film better than print. i entend to
There is no question that most negative color films are lower contrast
and have a wider exposure range than their equivalent speed in slide
film. If your scanner/scanner software has good ability to translate
the dye masks in negative films, you will get better results overall
with negative
You might try Fuji Reala if a 100 speed film is fast enough. It is one of
the few low-contrast negative films that has high color saturation.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 27, 2001 7:37 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Negatives vs
Alessandro wrote:
After reading a long thread on photo.net, which finally stated
that, due to Dmax values, low-end scanners work best with
negatives and hi-end with slides, I made my own little test
with my LS-30 by shooting the same (a bit contrasty) scene
with Kodak Supra 100 and Fuji
20 matches
Mail list logo
