In a message dated 4/24/2001 3:50:37 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
For the same reason that Epson hasn't updated the drivers for the Epson
Stylus Pro, or that MS stopped upgrading Win 95. This biz is more about
moving people to the next generation of devices, not to fix the errors
What's the deal with ICE^3 support for the new Nikon scanners only??
If Nikon offers NS3 for the LS-2000, why not offer the full deal???
shAf :o)
For the same reason that Epson hasn't updated the drivers for the Epson
Stylus Pro, or that MS stopped upgrading Win 95. This biz
Ed writes ...
To Nikon's credit, they did support the LS-30 and LS-2000 in
NikonScan 3.0. This not only makes for happier customers (and
word of mouth from happy customers is a powerful marketing
technique) but it also reduces their support load (assuming there
are fewer bugs in NikonScan
Science Fiction
-Original Message-
From: shAf [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2001 3:59 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Nikon 4000 ED Review Part III
Jack writes ...
...
It is amazing what Digital ROC can do for under
and over exposed images
AM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Nikon 4000 ED Review Part III
hello again Jack :o)
What's the deal with ICE^3 support for the new Nikon scanners only??
If Nikon offers NS3 for the LS-2000, why not offer the full deal???
shAf :o)
That is out of our control. I'll pass it on to Nikon
Jules writes ...
- Original Message -
From: "shAf" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
What's the deal with ICE^3 support for the new Nikon scanners
only??
If Nikon offers NS3 for the LS-2000, why not offer the full
deal???
i'd love to get ICE^3 for my LS-2000. it's typical for companies to
From: "shAf" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
What's the deal with ICE^3 support for the new Nikon scanners only??
If Nikon offers NS3 for the LS-2000, why not offer the full deal???
shAf :o)
One would think that Nikon would at least offer ICE^3 as an upgrade for a
fee for the LS 2000 and LS 30 owners.
Thanks for the very informative evaluation, Dieder. I wonder -- since at
least one user found this to be a problem -- how did you find the
edge-of-frame sharpness to be when scanning at 4000dpi? Is shallow depth of
field truly an issue with this scanner? I'm about to purchase one, so I'm
Dieder writes ...
...
A few comments about NikonScan 3.0.
---
I am impressed at the accuracy of the colour that is
available now. ...
Which color spaces are you scanning into? Which "wide gamut" color
spaces does NS3 offer??
shAf :o)
Andy Adler wrote:
Thanks for the very informative evaluation, Dieder. I wonder -- since at
least one user found this to be a problem -- how did you find the
edge-of-frame sharpness to be when scanning at 4000dpi? Is shallow depth of
field truly an issue with this scanner? I'm about to
Additional features about NikonScan that I haven't investigated
thoroughly yet are the 'Grain reduction algorithm' and the
'restoration of colour algorithm'. I hope I don't need to explore the
'ROC' for a while yet...it'd be somewhat alarming if 2-10 yr old negs
that have been properly
Jack writes ...
...
It is amazing what Digital ROC can do for under
and over exposed images!
Scenes with washed our color come alive! They don't
have to be old and faded, but when they are,
the color comes back better than the original.
The color appears more accurate also. Try it.
I
- Original Message -
From: "shAf" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 20, 2001 1:59 PM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Nikon 4000 ED Review Part III
What's the deal with ICE^3 support for the new Nikon scanners only??
If Nikon offers NS3 for the LS
13 matches
Mail list logo
