RE: filmscanners: Nikon Scan 3 - Digital ICE

2001-07-10 Thread Vladislav Jurco
>With clean film, ICE shouldn't have anything to do. >Regards >Tony Sleep Tony there IS a difference - less apparent grain and slightly less contrast at highest picture frequencies (app. 60 lp/mm). Whole picture is affected. Vlad --- Odchozí zpráva neobsahuje viry. Zkontrolováno antivirov

RE: filmscanners: Nikon Scan 3 - Digital ICE

2001-07-09 Thread Tony Sleep
On Mon, 9 Jul 2001 22:08:05 +0100 James Grove ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > I havent (yet) notved any differnece between scans with ICE and > without. Maybe I am not doing something right?! Drop your film in the ashtray, and try again :) With clean film, ICE shouldn't have anything to do

RE: filmscanners: Nikon Scan 3 - Digital ICE

2001-07-09 Thread Jawed Ashraf
e shop across the road has any) > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of James Grove > Sent: 09 July 2001 22:08 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: RE: filmscanners: Nikon Scan 3 - Digital ICE > > > > I havent (yet) notved any

RE: filmscanners: Nikon Scan 3 - Digital ICE

2001-07-09 Thread James Grove
I havent (yet) notved any differnece between scans with ICE and without. Maybe I am not doing something right?! James Grove [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://www.jamesgrove.co.uk http://www.mountain-photos.co.uk ICQ 99737573 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PRO