Alan writes ...
Due to the variation in mask on negative films from batch to
batch and development to develope of individual rolls, a profile
like is done with an IT-8 on slide film doesn't work too well.
BUT it occurred to me on film scanners that do NOT have the
ability to vary their
In a message dated 4/25/2001 0:08:19 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Which isn't to say Ed has a few issues to work out. Ed may have more to
say, but I believe his evaluation of Q60 target results only in a
matrix-type profile, which, generally is a simplification of a device
profile.
Ed writes ...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
... Ed may have more to say, but I believe his
evaluation of Q60 target results only in a
matrix-type profile, which, generally is a
simplification of a device profile.
As long as the sensor is linear, there's nothing that can even
In a message dated 4/25/2001 10:27:32 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
As long as the sensor is linear, there's nothing that can even
theoretically be more accurate than a 3x3 matrix transform. This
is what VueScan uses.
...
Just to clarify ... does a simple 3x3 matrix profile
In a message dated 4/25/2001 0:08:19 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Which isn't to say Ed has a few issues to work out. Ed may have more to
say, but I believe his evaluation of Q60 target results only in a
matrix-type profile, which, generally is a simplification of a device
Ed writes ...
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
...
Just to clarify ... does a simple 3x3 matrix
profile allow for the capture of each R,G B
channel having a different linearity?
I don't know what different linearity means. The 3x3 matrix
transform assumes that each CCD channel's
