TECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 8:32 PM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Puzzled about display resolution
| -Original Message-
| From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Maris V. Lidaka,
| Sr.
| Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 5:14 PM
| To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Subj
When I was trying to get my monitors to match visually, I scanned the
Macbeth Color Checker and made it the wallpaper on both my systems. It made
it easy to see at a glance how far off they were to each other.
It also made for an interesting visual effect when someone first walked
into the
Maris writes ...
And is it really a gamma control, or just a contrast or
brightness control?
...
Easily tested ... if it brightens blackpoint,
it is a brightness control ... if blackpoint doesn't
change but whitepoint does, it is contrast ...
if neither Bp or Wp change, it
CTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2001 10:40 AM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Puzzled about display
resolution
| | Maris writes ...| | And is it really a gamma
control, or just a contrast or | brightness control?| ...|
| Easily tested ... if it brightens blackpoint, | it is a brightness
control ... if
Larry wrote:
When I was trying to get my monitors to match visually, I scanned the
Macbeth Color Checker and made it the wallpaper on both my systems.
Is the colour checker downloadable?
Rob
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Puzzled about display resolution
And is it really a gamma control, or just a contrast or
brightness control?
Marz 2001 00:08
| An: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
| Betreff: Re: filmscanners: Puzzled about display resolution
|
|
| OK, now I've gone all the way to 1600x1200, but I find my
| Photoshop palettes, and the font used in them, have gotten
| rather tiny. I don't see an obvious way to fix this.
| Can you help?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Maris V. Lidaka,
Sr.
Sent: Monday, March 19, 2001 5:14 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Puzzled about display resolution
Does the Matrox G450 have a setting for changing
Lynn Allen wrote:
You guys are just lucky you can joke about it in your native tongues! ;-)
LRA-USofA
That would be "Oh, Canada, our home and native tongues"... ;-)
Unfortunately, I don't speak Inuit, or any other aboriginal dialect.
Art
Frank Paris wrote:
I believe the United States should take over western Canada and bring you
guys up to speed. And don't tell me about waste and consumption. I know what
your government has done to some of the canyons in B.C.: logged out all the
timber, then scraped the bottom down to
There's a very easy test.
There's a firm called Insight that sells mail order PCs and components in
both the US and the UK.
The US site is www.insight com, the UK site is www.insight.com/uk
Since this is the same firm with more or less the same product lines you
can do direct US/UK price
Laurie Solomon wrote:
My neck is located in East Central Illinois. If you look at all the
pre-packaged systems advertised in the newspapers and in catalogs, they are
offered with 17" monitors with 19" being the upgrade; but they have been
changing to making 19" monitors the standard
Once again, everything you say is likely true in the United States of
Waste and Consumption, but it sure isn't true here in Western Canada,
and I bet it also isn't true in Europe, Australia, and most other places.
Art
Mike Kersenbrock wrote:
Arthur Entlich wrote:
Lastly, even if
my
Stuart wrote:
Once again, everything you say is likely true in the United States of
Waste and Consumption, but it sure isn't true here in Western Canada, and
I bet it also isn't true in Europe, Australia, and most other places.
Art
What !!- u mean there are other countries in the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Frank Paris) wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Derek Clarke
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2001 3:57 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Puzzled about display resolution
Poor old Bill
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Arthur Entlich
Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2001 3:26 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Puzzled about display resolution
Once again, everything you say is likely true in the United
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Derek Clarke
Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2001 8:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Puzzled about display resolution
An inappropriate choice of control is just as much a bug
display resolution
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Derek Clarke
Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2001 8:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Puzzled about display resolution
An inappropriate choice of control is just as much
: Puzzled about display resolution
Stuart wrote:
Once again, everything you say is likely true in the United States of
Waste and Consumption, but it sure isn't true here in Western Canada, and
I bet it also isn't true in Europe, Australia, and most other places.
Art
What !!- u mean
Once again, everything you say is likely true in the United States of
Waste and Consumption, but it sure isn't true here in Western Canada, and
I bet it also isn't true in Europe, Australia, and most other places.
Art
What !!- u mean there are other countries in the world apart from
America
At 08:23 10-03-01 -0800, you wrote:
Stuart wrote:
Once again, everything you say is likely true in the United States of
Waste and Consumption, but it sure isn't true here in Western Canada, and
I bet it also isn't true in Europe, Australia, and most other places.
Art
What !!-
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Laurie Solomon
Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2001 11:05 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Puzzled about display resolution
I concur with you that fixed fonts, menus, dialog boxes
, March 10, 2001 5:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Puzzled about display resolution
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Laurie Solomon
Sent: Saturday, March 10, 2001 11:05 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Puzzled about display resolution
OK, now I've gone all the way to 1600x1200, but I find my
Photoshop palettes, and the font used in them, have gotten
rather tiny. I don't see an obvious way to fix this.
Can you help?
Thanks
Mark T. wrote:
Sorry to give you the bad news, but if you surf around with java/javascript
on, site counters will gather the following information and report it back
to the site owner:
- Your browser and version no.
- Your operating system
- Your resolution and color depth
- Your
Frank Paris wrote:
All of that can be handled, since you can specify large icons, etc.
Frank Paris
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684
Does using "large icons" also increase menu and tool sizes within a
program, like Photoshop? Inquiring minds want to
Hi!
I would prefer that vuescan be optimized for the higher resolutions, or
better yet, there be a way to switch between optimizations (something in
vuescan.ini, for example).
I run 1600x1200 on my work computer and on my home Internet and general
purpose computer, but since my wife prefers the
Laurie Solomon wrote:
Most people are using 17" monitors these days,
which is the sweet spot in the pricing structure right now
Not in my neck of the woods. Actually, at least where I live, 19" monitors
are the current popular models and tend to be the sweet spot in terms of
pricing.
Please do run a survey, and post the results. I'll happily admit I'm
wrong if I am.
Until 12 months ago, I ran my system on a 13-14" monitor (we use
different measurements in Canada, they are based upon the visible
display rather than the size of the CRT) originally running 640 x 480,
then
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Derek Clarke
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2001 3:57 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Puzzled about display resolution
Poor old Bill seems to be getting a lot of undeserved flak here
Robert Kehl wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Arthur Entlich [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 9:18 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Puzzled about display resolution
You are making a number of assumptions which may not hold true for many
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Clark Guy
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2001 6:16 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Puzzled about display resolution
Hi!
Is it possible to write the software to detect the resolution
Frank Paris wrote:
Oh, did I mention your monitor will probably burn out sooner at that
screen mode?
Why? Because it's running at a higher frequencies? That's like saying a 33
Mhz Pentium will last longer than a 900 MHz Pentium III.
Well, it just might, actually ;-)
What I've found
for menu and font sizes.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Arthur Entlich
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2001 5:51 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Puzzled about display resolution
Frank Paris wrote:
All of that can be handled
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Arthur Entlich
Sent: Friday, March 09, 2001 6:22 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Puzzled about display resolution
Laurie Solomon wrote:
Most people are using 17" monitors these days,
which is the sweet spot in the pricing structu
Arthur Entlich wrote:
Lastly, even if
my video card and monitor can produce 1600 x 1200 pixel screen, I'd be
unlikely to use it that way, due to the way it would shrink icons,
cursor and tool sizes on a 17" screen.
I think the sweetspot is now at 19". My wife, who uses her PC mostly
for
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Robert Kehl
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 9:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Puzzled about display resolution
Frank,
What's a Luddite? : )
BK
Someone who opposes
At 10:32 PM 7/03/01 -0500, you wrote:
Do you guys want to alienate all amateurs on this list? ;)
Of course not.
There *was* a smile there!
My visitor stats say that 80% of my visitors are using less than or equal
to 1024x768.
How do you know that is their display resolution, and not what
- Original Message -
From: "Mark T." [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 11:20 PM
Subject: [OT] javascript/java (was RE: filmscanners: Puzzled about
display resolution)
At 10:32 PM 7/03/01 -0500, you wrote:
My visitor stats say that
Frank
Keep in mind that a lot of software will not run, or will not run
correctly with Large or Scaled screen fonts. One of the first things
Adobe recommends when you are having stability problems with their
software ( Pagemaker, Photoshop, etc. ) is set the machine for small
fonts. Some of the
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Elmar Pinkhardt
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2001 2:11 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: AW: filmscanners: Puzzled about display resolution
So what I have read in this thread is, that most of you try
nt.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Jim Sharp
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2001 5:59 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Puzzled about display resolution
Frank
Keep in mind that a lot of s
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rob Geraghty
Austin wrote:
The right tools for the job. Having a 'resolution' of at
least 1280x1024 is not untypical for most people who do
image editing. In fact, I'd bet most on this list have
1600 x 1200.
Geeze, Austin. Several people have
dent under Win98SE.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: "Frank Paris" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2001 12:22 AM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Puzzled about display resolution
| Funny that the user interface doesn't require the monitors run at the same
PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rick Berk
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2001 12:33 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Puzzled about display resolution
Most web hosting companies can get stats from users of their websites. You
can find out what browsers are most popular, resolution
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of IronWorks
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2001 9:54 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Puzzled about display resolution
I'm reading the review now - it says that different monitor resolutions
cannot be set only in the Windows NT/2000
Maris wrote:
I'm reading the review now - it says that different monitor resolutions
cannot be set only in the Windows NT/2000:
"Under Windows NT/2000 you lose some flexibility in that your
two displays
cannot have resolutions independent of one another"
"Uncle Bill" strikes again! ;-)
Maris wrote:
I'm reading the review now - it says that different monitor resolutions
cannot be set only in the Windows NT/2000:
"Under Windows NT/2000 you lose some flexibility in that your
two displays
cannot have resolutions independent of one another"
"Uncle Bill" strikes again! ;-)
OK, now I've gone all the way to 1600x1200, but I find my
Photoshop palettes, and the font used in them, have gotten
rather tiny. I don't see an obvious way to fix this.
Can you help?
Thanks,
Alan
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Alan Shaw
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2001 3:08 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Puzzled about display resolution
OK, now I've gone all the way to 1600x1200, but I find my
Photoshop palettes, and the font used in them
Paris
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Alan Shaw
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2001 4:31 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Puzzled about display resol
: Puzzled about display resolution
Get a bigger monitor ;-)
OK, now I've gone all the way to 1600x1200, but I find my
Photoshop palettes, and the font used in them, have gotten
rather tiny. I don't see an obvious way to fix this.
Can you help?
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Elmar Pinkhardt
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2001 6:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: AW: filmscanners: Puzzled about display resolution
If you have a monitor with a maximum dot pitch of 0.24mm and
on 3/8/01 8:17 PM, Frank Paris at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Elmar Pinkhardt
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2001 6:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: AW: filmscanners: Puzzled about display resolution
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Berry Ives
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2001 9:41 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Puzzled about display resolution
I also read about the triadic structure of each screen pixel, so
The right tools for the job. Having a 'resolution' of at least 1280x1024 is
not untypical for most people who do image editing. In fact, I'd bet most
on this list have 1600 x 1200.
You can buy a decent monitor for around $400 (the one I am using now for
most of my image editing I paid $375
Robert writes ...
... Why would anyone use
anything but the highest resolution available for scanning
and viewing images created with high resolution
devices such as filmscanners.
...
I use 1024x768 for word-processing and e-mail on my 17"
monitor, but for images I always use 1600x1200
Austin wrote:
The right tools for the job. Having a 'resolution' of at
least 1280x1024 is not untypical for most people who do
image editing. In fact, I'd bet most on this list have
1600 x 1200.
Geeze, Austin. Several people have already responded saying
they are editing files at
On Thu, 8 Mar 2001, Rob Geraghty wrote:
they are editing files at resolutions as low as 640x480. I've
yet to hear a response from anyone else who uses 1280x1024 let
alone 1600x1200. I'd be very suprised if "most" people
regularly use 1280x1024 let alone anything higher.
I'm not in favor
: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 4:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Puzzled about display resolution
Robert writes ...
... Why would anyone use
anything but the highest resolution available for scanning
and viewing images created with high resolution
devices
March 07, 2001 6:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Puzzled about display resolution
Heck, some of us are still using a 15" LCD display at 1024X768 32 bit, but
saving for a 21" trinitron and another video card. The dual display is
really the way to go, after tryi
Do you guys want to alienate all amateurs on this list? ;)
Of course not.
My visitor stats say that 80% of my visitors are using less than or equal
to 1024x768.
How do you know that is their display resolution, and not what their browser
is set to? I don't know how you do what you claim,
Austin Franklin wrote:
The right tools for the job. Having a 'resolution' of at least 1280x1024 is
not untypical for most people who do image editing. In fact, I'd bet most
on this list have 1600 x 1200.
I'd bet you are wrong. Most people are using 17" monitors these days,
which is
Robert Kehl wrote:
Well if you think you're puzzled, I'm really puzzled. Why would anyone use
anything but the highest resolution available for scanning and viewing
images created with high resolution devices such as filmscanners.
Unless your scanning at 72 dpi from a flatbed for use on
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Eli Bowen
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 7:33 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Puzzled about display resolution
I use twin 21" monitors at work under Win2K. Once you have tried
twin monitors you will be spoiled fo
e out there (but
maybe not in Australia - sorry, Rob).
Bob Kehl
- Original Message -
From: Mark T. [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 9:34 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Puzzled about display resolution
Do you guys want to alienate all amateurs on this list? ;)
The right tools for the job. Having a 'resolution' of at least
1280x1024 is
not untypical for most people who do image editing. In fact,
I'd bet most
on this list have 1600 x 1200.
I'd bet you are wrong. Most people are using 17" monitors these days,
which is the sweet spot in
Austin wrote:
Certainly there are people who use 640x480 to do image editing.
Your claim was that most people on the list would use 1600x1200. I think
there's been enough posts to the contrary to show that this is unlikely.
Frank is the other only person I've seen mentioning that resolution or
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Puzzled about display resolution
Try Matrox's latest, the 450, for $150. It has two video outputs build in.
One you can run one at 1600x1200, the other up to 2048x1536. Takes only one
slot.
Frank Paris
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://albums.photop
All of that can be handled, since you can specify large icons, etc.
Frank Paris
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684
Lastly, even if
my video card and monitor can produce 1600 x 1200 pixel screen, I'd be
unlikely to use it that way, due to the way it would
Frank,
What's a Luddite? : )
BK
- Original Message -
From: Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 10:57 PM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Puzzled about display resolution
There's no percentage in
being a Luddite these days when it comes
browsers.
Rick
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Austin Franklin
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 10:33 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Puzzled about display resolution
Do you guys want to alienate all amateurs on this list
CTED]
http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Eli Bowen
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 8:36 PM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Puzzled about display resolution
Unf
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Larry Berman
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 8:45 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Puzzled about display resolution
Now I need a second monitor, preferably a 21" or 19&q
ure to say that this has been the case for the last
year or more.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Arthur Entlich
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2001 9:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Puzzled about display resolution
Austin Fran
75 matches
Mail list logo
