I was referring *specifically* to the combination of Athlon/x
motherboard/W2K.
And
PRECISELY MY POINT - dear oh dear, some Athlon chipsets (KT133A, say)
don't
get on with W2K.
I have an Athalon 1.33 and a KT133A motherboard running W2K. Also
running a
load of USB SCSI
the bottom - L. )
Geoff
www.geoffmurray.com
- Original Message -
From: Herm [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 02, 2001 7:31 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: RE: Custom PC spec
memory is super cheap right now, a 256mb module is only $34.. so stock up,
your
new
At 21:49 02-08-01 +0100, Jawed Ashraf wrote:
I saw benchmarks of a 1.3GHz Athlon outperforming a 1.7GHz P4 in
Photoshop... Wish I knew where they were now.
Possibly here:
Choosing the Best Platform for Adobe Photoshop
http://www.xbitlabs.com/cpu/photoshop-platform/
That wasn't it, but
I'm using a PIII 800 with 768 MB and a Matrox G400 Dual Head under Win98SE. It's a
year and a half or so old now, and I'm still very happy with it. If I was building a
new one now, I'd do a gigahertz processor with 1 gig of the fastest RAM I could find,
a G500 card and maybe one of those new
Matrox is fine.
With Windows 2000, since your file sizes are ~70MB, why not 1GB of RAM? RAM
is dirt cheap these days.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: Cooke, Julie [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, August 01, 2001 12:50 PM
Subject: filmscanners: RE: Custom PC
I've got a Celeron 466 with 128MB of RAM and recently bought a Nikon
Coolscan LS4000. I think it's time to upgrade my machine! I've concluded
that I need a custom built machine with a graphics card where the look up
table can be calibrated
I am missing something here? I think you'll find
memory is super cheap right now, a 256mb module is only $34.. so stock up, your
new motherboard should handle 3 modules, for a total of 768mb of memory.
You should also make sure you get a fast hard drive, usually 7200rpm and ATA100.
I like IBM drives.
Cooke, Julie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I
At 21:24 01-08-01 +0100, Jawed Ashraf wrote:
The Athlon/RAM combination is very good value at the moment (actually that
combination is silly money). If you buy as a complete system you should
have no trouble - though it is fair to say that W2K and some varieties of
Athlon motherboard do not get
At 21:24 01-08-01 +0100, Jawed Ashraf wrote:
The Athlon/RAM combination is very good value at the moment
(actually that
combination is silly money). If you buy as a complete system you should
have no trouble - though it is fair to say that W2K and some varieties of
Athlon motherboard do
I was referring *specifically* to the combination of Athlon/x
motherboard/W2K.
And
PRECISELY MY POINT - dear oh dear, some Athlon chipsets (KT133A, say)
don't
get on with W2K.
I have an Athalon 1.33 and a KT133A motherboard running W2K. Also running a
load of USB SCSI perhipherals, as
10 matches
Mail list logo
