RE: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: My 8000does NOT ba nd using Vuescan!

2001-09-05 Thread Hemingway, David J
: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: My 8000does NOT ba nd using Vuescan! Winsor Crosby wrote: From the Polaroid page for the SS120: Single Pass RGB, 30K Pixel CCD (10,000 X 3 = 30,000) Since the banding problem has not turned up with the Polaroid implementation I don't think

Re: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: My 8000does NOT ba nd using Vuescan!

2001-09-04 Thread Arthur Entlich
Winsor Crosby wrote: From the Polaroid page for the SS120: Single Pass RGB, 30K Pixel CCD (10,000 X 3 = 30,000) Since the banding problem has not turned up with the Polaroid implementation I don't think that the three row CCD idea is something that does not work in practice. It may

Re: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: My 8000does NOT ba nd using Vuescan!

2001-09-02 Thread Winsor Crosby
Austin wrote: Because the scanning software gives different results (appears to cure the problem), that doesn't mean it's not hardware. The jaggies problem is a design fault in the scanner hardware which fortunately can be resolved in software. I didn't say that the hardware wasn't