RE: filmscanners: Re: paperless office

2001-02-02 Thread Sumtingwong
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: filmscanners: Re: paperless office If we're going to have that attitude, let's start a thread about parrots! Or at least photographing them... Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL

Re: filmscanners: Re: paperless office

2001-02-02 Thread Hersch Nitikman
/ElectronicSignatures_s761.pdf Maris - Original Message - From: "Hersch Nitikman" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2001 2:18 AM Subject: RE: filmscanners: Re: paperless office | Interesting! Was it a Federal law? In what jurisdictions doe

Re: filmscanners: Re: paperless office

2001-02-02 Thread IronWorks
It is - see my post of 12 hours ago. Maris - Original Message - From: "Sumtingwong" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2001 11:49 PM Subject: RE: filmscanners: Re: paperless office | I would have to do more research on this. A well infor

RE: filmscanners: Re: paperless office

2001-02-02 Thread Terry Carroll
On Thu, 1 Feb 2001, Sumtingwong wrote: I would have to do more research on this. A well informed friend told me about it at work. I do believe that it is now part of the U.S. Code, though. I hate for my first post to this list to be off-topic, but it is indeed federal law. The law is

Re: filmscanners: Re: paperless office

2001-02-01 Thread Gordon Tassi
that makes a digital signature (i.e. email) good in court. Spencer Stone -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Gordon Tassi Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2001 5:00 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: filmscanners: Re: paperless office

RE: filmscanners: Re: paperless office

2001-02-01 Thread Hersch Nitikman
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Gordon Tassi Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2001 5:00 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: filmscanners: Re: paperless office Although we are getting closer to a paperless society, I think that the biggest impediment is based on our legal system. Though we could

Re: filmscanners: Re: paperless office

2001-02-01 Thread Arthur Entlich
Recent legislative changes both in the US and Canada, have recognized the legality of electronic documentation under certain conditions. Eventually, through the use of bio-metrics, your electronic "signature" will be as "good" and as unique as your fingerprint. My on-line brokerage allows me

RE: filmscanners: Re: paperless office

2001-02-01 Thread Laurie Solomon
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: filmscanners: Re: paperless office A law was just passed here in the US that makes a digital signature (i.e. email) good in court. Spencer Stone -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Gordon Tassi Sent

RE: filmscanners: Re: paperless office

2001-02-01 Thread Laurie Solomon
or take for granted that the person has actually gotten the message until I have spoken with them voice to voice. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Arthur Entlich Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2001 5:26 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:

RE: filmscanners: Re: paperless office

2001-02-01 Thread Hornford, Dave
: Thursday, February 01, 2001 10:59 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: filmscanners: Re: paperless office Eventually, through the use of bio-metrics, your electronic "signature" will be as "good" and as unique as your fingerprint. What you say may be true enough; but even

Re: filmscanners: Re: paperless office

2001-02-01 Thread Michael Moore
e document not sit beside the document. -Original Message- From: Laurie Solomon [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2001 10:59 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: filmscanners: Re: paperless office Eventually, through the use of bio-metrics, your electronic

RE: filmscanners: Re: paperless office

2001-02-01 Thread Laurie Solomon
Sorry to hear that you broke your delete finger; hope it gets better soon. :-) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Michael Moore Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2001 6:35 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: filmscanners: Re: paperless office

RE: filmscanners: Re: paperless office

2001-02-01 Thread Frank Paris
Sent: Thursday, February 01, 2001 5:48 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: filmscanners: Re: paperless office Sorry to hear that you broke your delete finger; hope it gets better soon. :-) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Michael

RE: filmscanners: Re: paperless office

2001-02-01 Thread Laurie Solomon
PROTECTED] Subject: RE: filmscanners: Re: paperless office If we're going to have that attitude, let's start a thread about parrots! Or at least photographing them... Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://albums.photopoint.com/j/AlbumList?u=62684 -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED

RE: filmscanners: Re: paperless office

2001-02-01 Thread Sumtingwong
, January 31, 2001 10:19 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: filmscanners: Re: paperless office Interesting! Was it a Federal law? In what jurisdictions does it apply? Hersch At 06:00 PM 01/31/2001 -1000, you wrote: A law was just passed here in the US that makes a digital signature (i.e. email) good

Re: filmscanners: Re: paperless office

2001-02-01 Thread Bigboy9955
In a message dated 2/1/2001 11:17:02 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: . My comment was tongue-in-cheek with a smiley face to boot; it was not an instance of coping an attitude. Amen

RE: filmscanners: Re: paperless office

2001-02-01 Thread Sumtingwong
, January 31, 2001 10:00 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: filmscanners: Re: paperless office A law was just passed here in the US that makes a digital signature (i.e. email) good in court. Spencer Stone -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf

Re: filmscanners: Re: paperless office

2001-01-31 Thread Gordon Tassi
Although we are getting closer to a paperless society, I think that the biggest impediment is based on our legal system. Though we could electronically transmit signed documents showing some type of commitment to do something, the demand of a document that has a "fresh" signature is still the

Re: filmscanners: Re: paperless office

2001-01-31 Thread IronWorks
I don't think we'll ever be even mostly paperless. Paper has 2 values I can't see computers replacing despite technology improvements in ways we can't even imagine now. Ease of use in all too many instances - flipping back and forth between pages of a book, or a filmscanner review, or often

Re: filmscanners: Re: paperless office

2001-01-31 Thread IronWorks
The Electronic Communications Act 2000 is a start. http://www.hmso.gov.uk/acts/acts2000/2007.htm Maris - Original Message - From: "Gordon Tassi" [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, January 31, 2001 8:59 AM Subject: Re: filmscanners: Re: paperl

Re: filmscanners: Re: paperless office

2001-01-31 Thread Bigboy9955
In a message dated 01/31/2001 12:00:15 PM Eastern Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: The Electronic Communications Act 2000 is a start Faxed copies of legal documents such as lien waivers, applications and affadavits are being accepted as "legal" to the courts in some areas. Some

RE: filmscanners: Re: paperless office

2001-01-31 Thread Sumtingwong
: filmscanners: Re: paperless office Although we are getting closer to a paperless society, I think that the biggest impediment is based on our legal system. Though we could electronically transmit signed documents showing some type of commitment to do something, the demand of a document that has