: filmscanners: Website ref. re - Pixels per inch vs DPI
well thats an astonishing amount of work on this site, and very
interesting
reading,
but what dropped my jaw was that he did the tests on a
Canon Elan with a Canon 28-105mm lens
to judge the quality of 35mm vs 5x4 (among other things
In this context, you are right on Denise. Regards, Ron
- Original Message -
From: Denise E. Kissinger [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, November 01, 2001 7:03 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Website ref. re - Pixels per inch vs DPI
The Canon Elan is an excellent
well thats an astonishing amount of work on this site, and very interesting
reading,
but what dropped my jaw was that he did the tests on a
Canon Elan with a Canon 28-105mm lens
to judge the quality of 35mm vs 5x4 (among other things) with this is
plainly ridiculous
I'm not trying to be a snob
whether the results would apply also to their lenses.
Alessandro Pardi
-Original Message-
From: Paul Graham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: martedì 30 ottobre 2001 21.06
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Website ref. re - Pixels per inch vs DPI
well thats
.
Regards,
Alex Z
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Paul Graham
Sent: Tuesday, October 30, 2001 10:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Website ref. re - Pixels per inch vs DPI
well thats an astonishing amount of work on this site
I would highly recommend a visit to:
http://www.users.qwest.net/~rnclark/scandetail.htm
if you are interested in questions like 'How many Mp do I need to get to x quality..?'
Mr Clark has excellent samples and simulations up to 194 Mp (!) equivalents, and some
quite detailed information.
As
