Judging from the responses it would appear that the Nikon software
for the PC has problems with many Windows set ups, but the software
package for the Mac has no problems?
--
Winsor Crosby
Long Beach, California
At 03:57 PM 7/16/01 -0700, Winsor Crosby wrote:
Judging from the responses it would appear that the Nikon software
for the PC has problems with many Windows set ups, but the software
package for the Mac has no problems?
You've apparently missed several reports from
users of Nikon Scan on
Tony wrote:
MS newest technology for interchange of data between applications, sort of
DDE/OLE Plus. I think. For W95 it was an add-on separate install, with W98
it's part of Windows itself.
Doubtless this is a hopelessly wrong or inadequate explanation, but who
cares, on a filmscanner list?
you a wee bit of insight that you would not have otherwise gotten
without several years of frustration.
Best regards--LRA
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Tony Sleep)
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Which Buggy Software?
Date: Tue, 17 Jul 2001 02:49 +0100 (BST
Tony Sleep wrote:
The other major issue for system stability is MS COM components.
I'm slow on the uptake here. What are the MS COM components please Tony?
Colin Maddock
]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Which Buggy Software?
Date: Sun, 15 Jul 2001 22:33:07 -0400
At 07:29 PM 7/15/01 +0100, Tony Sleep wrote:
On Sat, 14 Jul 2001 07:14:41 -0400 rafeb ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
And as it turns out, I am a big Dan
Cary wrote:
Who am I to argue with Microsoft? w
Who, indeed? Even when you win the argument, you lose. :-)
--LRA
_
Get your FREE download of MSN Explorer at http://explorer.msn.com
On Mon, 16 Jul 2001 20:09:31 +1200 Colin Maddock ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
What are the MS COM components please Tony?
MS newest technology for interchange of data between applications, sort of
DDE/OLE Plus. I think. For W95 it was an add-on separate install, with W98
it's part of Windows
You're right on.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: Tony Sleep [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 16, 2001 8:49 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Which Buggy Software?
| On Sun, 15 Jul 2001 22:33:07 -0400 rafeb ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
|
| Nope. Dan's approach
On Sat, 14 Jul 2001 13:12:21 -0400 rafeb ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Maybe you're onto something here, Tony. I use
a Matrox G200 AGP board. But strangely enough,
its installation was rather messy (driver-wise)
and it still crashes during one of the more
obscure Wintune tests (though
At 19:29 15-07-01 +0100, Tony Sleep wrote:
The other major issue for system stability is MS COM components.
Registry entries for these get routinely messed up on every machine here,
but are easily fixed again via Norton Utilities Windoctor|Repair All. This
is the first place I look now if I get
On Sat, 14 Jul 2001 07:14:41 -0400 rafeb ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
And as it turns out, I am a big Dan Margulis
fan... hence my rotten attitude about ICC
color management, etc. I think, once you
start working in the Margulis mode, you're
probably spoiled forever from using these
NVidia GeForce Detonator Driver ver. 12.41 is digitally signed by
Microsoft
and WHQL (Windows Hardware Quality Lab) certified as well. I'm
not aware of
any stability issues. I use a GeForce card instead of a Matrox because I
need its OpenGL performance and features. It's not for games.
NS 3.1 can be observed in Task Manager while it's running. While
it doesn't
impact both CPUs very much it does claim practically all
available RAM and
virtual memory (99%!). Before I start the application there is
approximately 670 MB of free RAM and over nearly 1 GB free unfragmented
- Original Message -
From: Tony Sleep [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, July 15, 2001 1:29 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Which Buggy Software?
| On Sat, 14 Jul 2001 07:14:41 -0400 rafeb ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
|
| And as it turns out, I am a big Dan Margulis
| fan
At 07:29 PM 7/15/01 +0100, Tony Sleep wrote:
On Sat, 14 Jul 2001 07:14:41 -0400 rafeb ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
And as it turns out, I am a big Dan Margulis
fan... hence my rotten attitude about ICC
color management, etc. I think, once you
start working in the Margulis mode, you're
At 23:23 15-07-01 +0100, Jawed Ashraf wrote:
NS 3.1 can be observed in Task Manager while it's running. While
it doesn't
impact both CPUs very much it does claim practically all
available RAM and
virtual memory (99%!). Before I start the application there is
approximately 670 MB of
You're in Dan Margulis's camp, then? He maintains (and I have no opinion
one way or the other) that 16-bit color are not necessary.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: rafeb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2001 8:45 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Which Buggy
-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Which Buggy Software?
Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 13:25:34 -0600
I have read that NikonTech has told someone they are the only one having
problems. This may be just a rumor, or not, so here is my short story.
NikonScan 3.1 crashes
On Fri, 13 Jul 2001 21:45:56 -0400 rafeb ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I've been making scans in 24-bit color for years, on
about 3 or 4 different film scanners. I don't use
the 48-bit color mode, ever, even on the 8000.
No posterization. I suspect there's another reason
for the
On Fri, 13 Jul 2001 18:19:28 -0700 Pat Perez ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
the
most infamous being 3rd party manufacturer video drivers
Yup! Absolutely (one reason why I conservatively stick to Matrox is that -
eventually anyhow - their drivers usually get to be well behaved).
It may be
At 14:30 14-07-01 +0100, Tony Sleep wrote:
On Fri, 13 Jul 2001 18:19:28 -0700 Pat Perez ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
the
most infamous being 3rd party manufacturer video drivers
Yup! Absolutely (one reason why I conservatively stick to Matrox is that -
eventually anyhow - their drivers
I as well try to use Matrox whenever I build a system. It helps that I don't
play computer games, as they are sub par for that. One aspect of Matrox'
approach toward drivers is the fact that they continue to get their drivers
certified by Microsoft's certification lab, which means a particular
At 02:30 PM 7/14/01 +0100, Tony Sleep wrote:
On Fri, 13 Jul 2001 18:19:28 -0700 Pat Perez ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
the
most infamous being 3rd party manufacturer video drivers
Yup! Absolutely (one reason why I conservatively stick to Matrox is that -
eventually anyhow - their drivers
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: filmscanners: Which Buggy Software?
At 02:30 PM 7/14/01 +0100, Tony Sleep wrote:
On Fri, 13 Jul 2001 18:19:28 -0700 Pat Perez ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
the
most infamous being 3rd party manufacturer video drivers
Yup! Absolutely (one reason why I
I have read that NikonTech has told someone they are the only one having
problems. This may be just a rumor, or not, so here is my short story.
NikonScan 3.1 crashes regularly when saving a scan. Usually I can get at
least one scan saved, but then trying to
save a second scan sometimes works,
Wilks
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2001 1:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Which Buggy Software?
I have read that NikonTech has told someone they are the only one having
problems. This may be just a rumor, or not, so here is my short story.
NikonScan 3.1 crashes regularly when
At 11:59 AM 7/13/01 -0700, Winsor Crosby wrote:
There seems to be some difference in the experience of people using
Nikon scanner software. Some people say it is fine. Others complain
bitterly about its bugginess with out much more in the way of
additional information. Since Nikon provides
Winsor Crosby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
additional information. Since Nikon provides two software packages,
one for the Mac and one for Windows, it might be useful to know the
operating systems of those people who offer their experiences one way
of the other.
Nikonscan 3.1 seems to work fine
off list for more advice troubleshooting, feel
free.
Pat
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: Darrell Wilks [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 13, 2001 12:25 PM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Which Buggy Software?
I have read that NikonTech has told someone
At 10:13 AM 7/14/01 +1000, Rob wrote:
Nikonscan 3.1 seems to work fine on my system, no crashes. Having said that
I don't use it because the scans come out posterised in comparison to
Vuescan output because Nikonscan only works with 8 bits of data from the
LS30. This shouldn't be an issue with
rafeb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been making scans in 24-bit color for years, on
about 3 or 4 different film scanners. I don't use
the 48-bit color mode, ever, even on the 8000.
I know I would! :)
No posterization. I suspect there's another reason
for the posterization you're seeing.
32 matches
Mail list logo
