On Sat, 24 Feb 2001 12:39:14 -0600 Laurie Solomon ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I think this is a very astute analysis with which I agree completely,
unfortunately. Mass market mentality not only seems to prevail; it appears
to be steadily advancing in all areas of life. Even life itself
On Sun, 25 Feb 2001 04:09:50 -0800 Arthur Entlich ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
We do allow ourselves to exploit one another... there always appears to
be someone willing to undercut the last guy's bid, one way or another.
PLUGWhich is why all editorial photographers should be in EP
Tony Sleep wrote:
Along with the advantages of the easy, lossless reproduceability of
digital has
come the biggest threat of all: clients demanding all rights forever,
usually
for no extra fee, in order to exploit the photographs (and the
photographer)
more thoroughly.
If artists
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: why bother professionally ??
On Thu, 22 Feb 2001 17:13:12 - Dicky ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
Do remember that death is natures way of warning the body to slow
down.(:-)
My wife puts it differently, and more threateningly ;)
Still, whether
On Tue, 20 Feb 2001 23:48:56 - Dicky ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
You will, at some future stage, have to chose between taking the picture and
reproducing it, simply because the time scale will eventually force you to
decide between the two processes. One is creative and the other largely
- Original Message -
From: "Tony Sleep" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
and some slight possibility of not
dying of starvation after all.
Do remember that death is natures way of warning the body to slow
down.(:-)
Richard Corbett
PS I just love your web site XXX
It seems that are hearing from two approaches to photography.
One shoots thousands of images and uses standard processing to all images.
I would expect anyone shooting catalogs, weddings, and newspapers can not
afford to custom process each image, whether in the darkroom or on the
computer.
