This does seem to be a confusing issue to some. I've had seasoned professional
photographers
bring me JPG image files on a 3.5" floppy asking for an 8" X 10" print. The only
correlation
between the pixel density product (H X V) of the electronic image and the hard image
is the
target
Austin Franklin wrote:
The only dimensions that matter are the number of pixels. The dpi and
hence the "physical dimensions" are utterly meaningless.
That's erroneous to say they are 'utterly meaningless'. They CLEARLY are
utterly meaningFUL to the printer driver, and, along with the
Tony Sleep wrote:
Just to prevent reinventing the wheel, is this based upon personal
experience? My assumption would be different (since Photoshop does a
wonderful resampling job, and many printer spoolers do not
I've tried printing same image at 240,300,360 and 720dpi. I reckoned
Austin Franklin wrote:
This is absolutely correct. You can send the printer driver any
resolution
you want, and it has to interpolate the data into halftone screens
anyway.
If you do leave the box checked, and resize, you will then be double
interpolating the data...once in PS
Guy Prince wrote:
Art,
Point taken. But the bright orange blazers and pants with the
bright orange background kept me mesmerized. I was helpless.
Guy
I have to admit I haven't seen the show since we got a color TV...
(about 35 years ago??)
Come to think of it, is that the
Johnny Deadman wrote:
on 5/11/00 8:16 pm, Arthur Entlich at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But when I want to be warm and comfy, I sit in the living room
(big enough for 5 people on two sofas) with my laptop and pretend
everything is rosey while watching Lawrence Welk. Tonight's show
Austin Franklin wrote:
This is absolutely correct. You can send the printer driver any resolution
you want, and it has to interpolate the data into halftone screens anyway.
If you do leave the box checked, and resize, you will then be double
interpolating the data...once in PS and once
This is absolutely correct. You can send the printer driver any
resolution
you want, and it has to interpolate the data into halftone screens
anyway.
If you do leave the box checked, and resize, you will then be double
interpolating the data...once in PS and once in the printer
Joanna,
I've had a Viewsonic P815 for three years and no problems
to date. I don't know what the latest version is. They seem to be
built like a 'tank'.
Chris.
- Original Message -
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, November 04, 2000 12:53 AM
Robert,
I've had a ViewSonic P815 (that's 19") for three years now
without a glitch. I don't know what the latest version is though.
I'm interested in your comment about monitor calibration using
"ColorVision". Can you please tell me more and where I can get it. I
too
on 5/11/00 8:16 pm, Arthur Entlich at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But when I want to be warm and comfy, I sit in the living room
(big enough for 5 people on two sofas) with my laptop and pretend
everything is rosey while watching Lawrence Welk. Tonight's show
showcases Walt Disney.
I watched
PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Re: monitors
Guy: I also am new at this, have an LS-30, and a system with
much less capacity
than yours. I have found (through trial and error) that the
system handles the
scan better if you scan at 2700 set at the original negative
size, then play
Guy Prince wrote:
Tony,
I have been forced into laptopdom because of space. We had to
buy a home about 1/4 the size of the rental home we had. My
computer/photography lab was sacrificed.
Although I do have a large two car detached garage with power,
water,
Frank Paris wrote:
The two horizontal lines on Trinitron monitors are intrinsic to the design
and as far as I know will always be there. I know, it is a nuisance. I'm
always mistaking them for a scratch on the film, for that's just about what
Those lines are shadows of wires used to tension
The two horizontal lines on Trinitron monitors are intrinsic to the design
and as far as I know will always be there.
Tubes that use an aperture grid, such as some of Mitsubishi's, are a better
compromise between the severe tonal aperture errors with shadow-mask tubes, and
the striped
on 11/3/00 5:53 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
i am a photographer with a PC, Nikon scanner and Epson 750 (eventually a
2000). i want to get a 20 inch monitor and would like some recommendations
about what kind to get? thanks, Joanna
This does not answer your question,
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Robert DeCandido
Sent: Friday, November 03, 2000 6:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: filmscanners: Re: Monitors
BTW, why the Epson 2000? Too much money, too slow and Cone will
have a color
CIS
17 matches
Mail list logo
