Re: filmscanners: CANON FS4000US vs NIKON IV ED

2001-06-11 Thread Lorne W. Stobbs
: Saturday, June 09, 2001 2:25 AM Subject: Re: filmscanners: CANON FS4000US vs NIKON IV ED I hope some good reviews come out, otherwise I'll probably opt for the SprintScan 4000. It's price has gone down and it's bundled with SilverFast. Also,overall, I've heard good things about Polaroid's

Re: filmscanners: CANON FS4000US vs NIKON IV ED

2001-06-09 Thread Steve Greenbank
: filmscanners: CANON FS4000US vs NIKON IV ED I hope some good reviews come out, otherwise I'll probably opt for the SprintScan 4000. It's price has gone down and it's bundled with SilverFast. Also,overall, I've heard good things about Polaroid's customer service. Finally, I'm not sure

Re: filmscanners: CANON FS4000US vs NIKON IV ED

2001-06-08 Thread Arthur Entlich
AR Studio wrote: Canoscan FS4000. but resolution is lower. Does that help? Helen + Andrew Well, That's disappointing. I'm hoping you got a defective one ;-) Sounds like it is little to no improvement over the 2700 FS 2710 then. Art

Re: filmscanners: CANON FS4000US vs NIKON IV ED

2001-06-08 Thread Chris Hargens
Subject: Re: filmscanners: CANON FS4000US vs NIKON IV ED i guess the long wait for the improved canon was a waste of time. it seems that i always wait for the next improved version of many computer products and they wind up not being all that much better. the nikon has a better advertised dynamic

Re: filmscanners: CANON FS4000US vs NIKON IV ED

2001-06-07 Thread AR Studio
yes! yes! we've tried both. after 1.5 days took canon back to the store. bought nikon IV today and it's absolutely awesome. didnt' have any problems installing/running it either, like I hear some people do. now, in short what's wrong with the canon: narrow dynamic range. you can either get