RE: filmscanners: Filmscanners: OT: E-mail virus

2001-12-13 Thread Mark Otway
While it indeed may be more sensible for the ISP to maintain a virus checking operation on all messages coming into and going out of their ISP, your ISP also, evidently, seems to work under the assumption that redundancy insures that the message will get through and sends out multiple

RE: filmscanners: Filmscanners: OT: E-mail virus

2001-12-13 Thread Mark Otway
Well, you're playing an online form of Russian Roulette then. Some of the recent rash of viruses attach themselves to web pages. Click on the right link, and you're hit! And, you probably won't know about it until for some time. Unless of course, the virus trashes your system. If you

Re: filmscanners: Filmscanners: OT: E-mail virus

2001-12-13 Thread Moreno Polloni
Well, you're playing an online form of Russian Roulette then. Some of the recent rash of viruses attach themselves to web pages. Click on the right link, and you're hit! And, you probably won't know about it until for some time. Unless of course, the virus trashes your system. If you

RE: filmscanners: Filmscanners: OT: E-mail virus

2001-12-13 Thread Laurie Solomon
I understanbd completely and was just pulling your leg. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mark Otway Sent: Thursday, December 13, 2001 3:46 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: filmscanners: Filmscanners: OT: E-mail virus While

Re: filmscanners: Filmscanners: OT: E-mail virus

2001-12-12 Thread Alan Tyson
AM Subject: filmscanners: Filmscanners: OT: E-mail virus I've noticed several e-mails about viruses on this e-mail list non of which I seem to have received. On further investigation I have discovered that my service provider Freeserve (cheap almost cheerful) will not allow dodgy attachments

RE: filmscanners: Filmscanners: OT: E-mail virus

2001-12-12 Thread Mark Otway
Perhaps we should all suggest to our service providers that they should impliment a similar scheme. The ISP that hosts my website and provides my mail has a virus-checker running on the pop and smtp servers. This means that I *cannot* receive a virus, and if I accidently catch one it can't

RE: filmscanners: Filmscanners: OT: E-mail virus

2001-12-12 Thread Mark Otway
Perhaps we should all suggest to our service providers that they should impliment a similar scheme. The ISP that hosts my website and provides my mail has a virus-checker running on the pop and smtp servers. This means that I *cannot* receive a virus, and if I accidently catch one it can't be

RE: filmscanners: Filmscanners: OT: E-mail virus

2001-12-12 Thread LAURIE SOLOMON
of your posts. :-) I received several copies of the post below. -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Mark Otway Sent: Wednesday, December 12, 2001 7:50 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: filmscanners: Filmscanners: OT: E-mail virus Perhaps

Re: filmscanners: Filmscanners: OT: E-mail virus

2001-12-12 Thread Moreno Polloni
Perhaps we should all suggest to our service providers that they should impliment a similar scheme. The ISP that hosts my website and provides my mail has a virus-checker running on the pop and smtp servers. This means that I *cannot* receive a virus, and if I accidently catch one it

filmscanners: Filmscanners: OT: E-mail virus

2001-12-11 Thread Steve Greenbank
I've noticed several e-mails about viruses on this e-mail list non of which I seem to have received. On further investigation I have discovered that my service provider Freeserve (cheap almost cheerful) will not allow dodgy attachments such as *.exe or *.vbs they just bounce. Harmless files

filmscanners: RE: filmscanners: Filmscanners: OT: E-mail virus

2001-12-11 Thread Rob Geraghty
[bouncing of possibly infected attachments] Perhaps we should all suggest to our service providers that they should impliment a similar scheme. At some point, Microsoft will probably kick up a stink. I wish they'd never allowed VBS or any sort of scripting in email! Frankly there ought to be a