Art wrote:
All the clues are there...
1) Taken at Disneyland
2) Typical atmospheric gradation
3) look of woven paper stock
4) "crinkled" look
This one doesn't take Sherlock Holmes to figure out!
Heck, don't you know a painted backdrop when you see one? You think anyone
would go to
Lynn Allen wrote:
The photo was shot at Disneyland, with the Matterhorn (a roller-coaster
ride, at D'land) in the background.
What got my attention was the sky area, a clear-day blue with typical
atmospheric gradadation down toward to the horizion. What appeared at first
to be "dust" didn't
Rob wrote:
Lynn, what scanner are you using? An Acer I think?
Right on. I don't think it was the scanner's fault, this time, although
Scanwit's density-range leave lots of room for improvement. :-) It was
definitely the camera (and the operator)--I'd have done better to meter the
grass, with
Here's one I haven't seen very-well-addressed on the List before:
grain-aliasing on Ektachrome. Does it/can it exist? Oh, yes. I just ran
headlong into a real beauty!
The photo was shot at Disneyland, with the Matterhorn (a roller-coaster
ride, at D'land) in the background. Same scenario as I've
Lynn wrote:
so in reflective color. Result: another poorly-exposed slide that looks
fine on a projection screen, not-so-great on a 2700ppi scan.
Lynn, what scanner are you using? An Acer I think?
Rob
Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://wordweb.com
Lynn: I ran into a similar situation with what looked like flyspecks all over 3
images in a roll I had developed. They were shot from a beach looking across a
bay in the the early evening with the sun at 2 o'clock. The camera was angled
just enough to prevent lens flare. My solution was to
