Re: filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: High Capacity Storage (was CD RW Deal)

2001-06-18 Thread Robert Kehl
PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2001 1:07 AM Subject: Re: filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: High Capacity Storage (was CD RW Deal) But for 40 year storage JPEG's should be quite fine particually 4000 dpi high quality JPEGs, those found to be of importance can be transfered

Re: filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: High Capacity Storage (was CD RW Deal)

2001-06-14 Thread Walter Bushell
But for 40 year storage JPEG's should be quite fine particually 4000 dpi high quality JPEGs, those found to be of importance can be transfered to lossless formats and edited. If you can push something forward that long with only the loss of one high quality JPEG compression you are well ahead of

Re: filmscanners: High Capacity Storage (was CD RW Deal)

2001-06-13 Thread Robert Kehl
: filmscanners: High Capacity Storage (was CD RW Deal) Either way, high resolution scanners seem to dictate high capacity storage needs. I'd be interested to hear how others are storing and archiving 4000dpi scans. How about the new Iomega Peerless portables (10 and 20GB, USB and Firewire

filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: High Capacity Storage (was CD RW Deal)

2001-06-13 Thread Rob Geraghty
Bob Kehl wrote: I think you're absolutely right about CD's having more format longevity than Iomega products. But I figure in five years, or maybe 10, we'll have be able to get 10 terabyte?? raid arrays with mirroring for a few hundred bucks and we'll transfer all our Iomega's or CD's or

filmscanners: High Capacity Storage (was CD RW Deal)

2001-06-12 Thread Dan Honemann
Either way, high resolution scanners seem to dictate high capacity storage needs. I'd be interested to hear how others are storing and archiving 4000dpi scans. How about the new Iomega Peerless portables (10 and 20GB, USB and Firewire)? Anyone tried these yet? Dan

Re: filmscanners: High Capacity Storage (was CD RW Deal)

2001-06-12 Thread Johnny Deadman
on 6/12/01 5:41 AM, Dan Honemann at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Either way, high resolution scanners seem to dictate high capacity storage needs. I'd be interested to hear how others are storing and archiving 4000dpi scans. How about the new Iomega Peerless portables (10 and 20GB, USB and

Re: filmscanners: High Capacity Storage (was CD RW Deal)

2001-06-12 Thread Rob Geraghty
on 6/12/01 5:41 AM, Dan Honemann at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How about the new Iomega Peerless portables (10 and 20GB, USB and Firewire)? Anyone tried these yet? My only comment here is future proofing. It's more likely you'll have a drive which can read a CDR in 5 years time than an

Re: filmscanners: High Capacity Storage (was CD RW Deal)

2001-06-12 Thread Robert Kehl
Storage (was CD RW Deal) on 6/12/01 5:41 AM, Dan Honemann at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: How about the new Iomega Peerless portables (10 and 20GB, USB and Firewire)? Anyone tried these yet? My only comment here is future proofing. It's more likely you'll have a drive which can read a CDR

filmscanners: High Capacity Storage (was CD RW Deal)

2001-06-06 Thread Robert Kehl
- Original Message - From: Arthur Entlich [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2001 12:30 AM Subject: Re: filmscanners: CD RW Deal Jim Snyder wrote: on 6/5/01 7:01 AM, Larry Berman at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: I just read in PC World Magazine