Thanks for reminding me the light at the end of the tunnel is probably a
train coming straight at me! ;-)
BTW I only buy stereo equipment which has a creamy centre, or center,
depending on which brand of english one spells with... that way, all my
CDs sound like muzak.
The Mad Magazine
in making this type of decision.
Art
Bernhard Ess wrote:
- Original Message -
From: Simon Lamb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 6:56 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Minolta Scan Multi Pro REVIEW???
Bernhard Ess wrote:
SNIP:
BTW, I have re
will most likely go for the Nikon then... The Polaroid is cheaper, but no
ICE, unsecure future
greetings Bernhard
- Original Message -
From: david soderman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 3:10 AM
Subject: filmscanners: Minolta Scan Multi Pro
By the way, does anyone know how to email Minolta? I spent too much time
trying to figure out how to send a simple email on their website. Finally,
I just gave up.
Try [EMAIL PROTECTED] which was a tech support person 3 years ago.
Mike Duncan
Does not work anymore.
Ian
- Original Message -
From: Mike Duncan [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 24, 2001 4:00 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Minolta Scan Multi Pro REVIEW???
By the way, does anyone know how to email Minolta? I spent too much
time
Bernhard Ess wrote:
SNIP:
BTW, I have re- studied the sample scans of the Minolta and the Nikon 8000
on imaging- resource, and unfortunately I have come to the conclusion that
the Nikon ist the better scanner in almost every respect:
Bernhard
If you re-studied the article it disagrees with
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Minolta Scan Multi Pro REVIEW???
Bernhard Ess wrote:
SNIP:
BTW, I have re- studied the sample scans of the Minolta and the Nikon
8000
on imaging- resource, and unfortunately I have come to the conclusion
that
the Nikon ist the better scanner in almost
BTW, I have re- studied the sample scans of the Minolta and the Nikon 8000
on imaging- resource, and unfortunately I have come to the conclusion that
the Nikon ist the better scanner in almost every respect: Scans are clearer
(Minolta has like a veil over them) and show definitely less noise
Thanks for that Petru - I must have missed that wonderful Tony Sleep contribution :)
I too have grave doubts about the Imaging Resource reviews - as Tony says, their
comments about never having seen a 2800 dpi scanner and the fact that they were
seemingly unaware of grain-aliasing until
I also feel the Imaging Resource scanner reviews are weak. The scanner
operator seems to have no consistent methodology, no particular depth of
understanding of how features relate to performance, 'corrections' or
adjustments are performed with the scanner interface that make no sense from
the
Thank you to Bernhard Ess and Victor Landweber for the URL on the Minolta
review!
Just thought you might be interested to know that you both know more than
Minolta does!
I called Minolta and spoke to a fellow in digital imaging. He knew nothing
about any available reviews on the Scan Multi
david soderman wrote:
By the way, does anyone know how to email Minolta? I spent too much time
trying to figure out how to send a simple email on their website. Finally,
I just gave up.
It is amazing how companies do not really want to be bothered answering questions,
especially via
I think many of them are concerned about an e-mail-delivered
virus. Of course there are lots of ways around that, but it at least
makes for a good excuse. Of course, also, they really aren't all that
concerned about what their customers have to say, anyway...
Hersch
At 08:09 PM 10/23/2001, you
Hello there:
Just wondering if anyone has come across an actual test review of the
Minolta Scan Multi Pro unit?
(Not the Press Release...but the real thing)
Thanks in advance!
Joyfully, -david soderman-
David --
Look at: http://www.imaging-resource.com/SCAN/DSMP/DSMA.HTM
I'm still wondering about the LONG scan times for MF film at highest
resolution. The Minolta specs state a MUCH shorter time -- 230 seconds as I
recall. Could it be the slow Mac they were using at Image-Resource.com? Or
- Original Message -
From: david/lisa soderman [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, October 22, 2001 5:45 PM
Subject: filmscanners: Minolta Scan Multi Pro REVIEW???
Hello there:
Just wondering if anyone has come across an actual test review of the
Minolta Scan Multi
16 matches
Mail list logo
