> Registration of the SS4000 isn't consistent between scans therefore multi
> scanning produces less than ideal results for real world images. The SS120
> is slightly better in terms of registration but still not good enough.
That
> said I tend to agree with Ed and David there really are not the b
est images.
Ian Lyons
http://www.computer-darkroom.com
> From: "Al Bond" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2001 22:40:01 -
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: filmscanners: Multiple Pass Scanning on the SS4000
>
> Ed w
ECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Multiple Pass Scanning on the SS4000
Ed wrote:
> I've been thinking about working on this, but it never bubbles up
> to the top of my list. The SprintScan 4000 has so little noise in
> the dark parts of scans that there's no real need f
Ed wrote:
> I've been thinking about working on this, but it never bubbles up
> to the top of my list. The SprintScan 4000 has so little noise in
> the dark parts of scans that there's no real need for multi-pass
> scanning. This keeps this feature from bubbling up to the top
> of my list.
Wou
ssage-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2001 6:32 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: filmscanners: Multiple Pass Scanning on the SS4000
In a message dated 12/2/2001 12:45:22 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> The Vuescan Use
In a message dated 12/2/2001 12:45:22 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> The Vuescan Users' Guide mentions that the SS4000 often has registration
> problems between passes and that a future version of Vuescan will fix
this.
> I have experienced this myself, resulting in somewhat fuzzy image
Ed,
The Vuescan Users' Guide mentions that the SS4000 often has registration
problems between passes and that a future version of Vuescan will fix this.
I have experienced this myself, resulting in somewhat fuzzy images. Do you
know when this might be fixed?
Thanks,
Stan
