I'm still hard pressed to believe that software, in this case, can
cause
banding...mostly because some of these scanners don't band with
the exact
same software!
Why not? Nikon managed to achieve similar ineffable faults with the LS30
(the infamous 'jaggies', and Ed fixed that too.
Title: RE: filmscanners: My 8000 does NOT band using Vuescan!
It should be pointed out that NikonScan has a workaround also. It's called Super Fine mode and tells the scanner to only use one line of the CCD, exactly the same as VueScan now does. The problem here is that this will make
On Sun, 2 Sep 2001 09:52:41 -0400 Austin Franklin ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
wrote:
I'm still hard pressed to believe that software, in this case, can
cause
banding...mostly because some of these scanners don't band with the exact
same software!
Why not? Nikon managed to achieve similar
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, September 02, 2001 1:16 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: My 8000 does NOT band using Vuescan!
In a message dated 9/2/2001 8:06:37 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
For those of you who have been following
In a message dated 9/2/2001 12:28:58 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Even with the controllable light source of the Nikon? I would have guessed
that they compensated for that by boosting the LED output, or are they not
individually controllable? Do you know how many LEDs there are, per
All,
For those of you who have been following my ongoing saga with banding issues
with my Coolscan 8000 here is an interesting update. I have tried the
latest version of vuescan and guess what? It appears after doing a few test
that the banding does not occur when using that software. This is
Thanks Ed
for getting
vuescan up and humming for us 8000 users :-) Although i prefer Nikon Scan
for slides, it still proves that the hardware most likely is not the
problem
Or, that Ed found a way around the problem (or does something differently)
in software. You might want to
in there...
Jawed
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Lawrence Smith
Sent: 02 September 2001 14:04
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: filmscanners: My 8000 does NOT band using Vuescan!
All,
For those of you who have been following my ongoing
However, there's one more thing to consider - all scanners
compensate for non-uniform light sources by doing a
shading correction. For instance, the light intensity at
the edges of the scan is almost always at least 20% dimmer
than at the center.
Even with the controllable light source of
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: filmscanners: My 8000 does NOT band using Vuescan!
Wow, nice. Pity that you've been through so much grief with replacement
and sending the blighter off to get looked at.
Fingers crossed for NS 3.2... Anyone heard anything about it?
Maybe you should post a sample so
All,
For those of you who have been following my ongoing saga with banding issues
with my Coolscan 8000 here is an interesting update. I have tried the
latest version of vuescan and guess what? It appears after doing a few test
that the banding does not occur when using that software. Thanks
Austin wrote:
I'm still hard pressed to believe that software, in
this case, can cause banding...mostly because some
of these scanners don't band with the exact same software!
Funny, this is exactly that same sort of thing that was
said about the jaggies on the LS30 and LS2000. And isn't
it
Austin wrote:
I'm still hard pressed to believe that software, in
this case, can cause banding...mostly because some
of these scanners don't band with the exact same software!
Funny, this is exactly that same sort of thing that was
said about the jaggies on the LS30 and LS2000. And
Austin wrote:
Because the scanning software gives different results
(appears to cure the problem), that doesn't mean it's
not hardware.
The jaggies problem is a design fault in the scanner hardware which fortunately
can be resolved in software. I didn't say that the hardware wasn't
14 matches
Mail list logo
