Laurie Solomon wrote:
Sorry, drifting off topic.
Never a problem with me - especially if the information is informative or
interesting.
I hate to sound stupid; but I want to check and see if you mean what I think
you mean when you speak of CN in relation to film. Are you speaking
Most local shops in my area will process "SFW" film but require an add on price
whether it is marked C-41 or not.
Gordon
Tim Victor wrote:
On Saturday, March 24, Arthur Entlich wrote:
Mike is right. There are no "supermarket" brands. 3M/Scotch used to be
a main supplier of these
The bothe the Imation slides and Ferrania (3M) C-41 negative scan very well in
VueScan. (I have not touched my NikonScan in ages.) I have not see much in the
way of scretches on the film/slides even under magnification in PS. There have
been some scratches but very, very few. Maybe one in one
as there a full moon. :-)
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Arthur Entlich
Sent: Tuesday, March 27, 2001 3:18 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Neg film for scanning
Laurie Solomon wrote:
Sorry, drifting off topic.
Nev
On Sun, 25 Mar 2001 19:24:15 -0800 Arthur Entlich ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
I haven't noted much from Ferannia in recent years, at least in Canada.
OT, but... Ferrania have recently reintroduced an own-branded colour reversal
film, for all the sad old gits who used to splash around DIY
-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Gordon Tassi
Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2001 10:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Neg film for scanning
Mark: Re: 3M film.
According to the people at Photo Works (used to be Seattle Film Works)
their
negative col
ge-
From: Hersch Nitikman [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2001 8:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Neg film for scanning
I don't believe that Seattle Film Works were the first in that business. The
first I heard of were RGB Color Labs in Hollywood, CA.
MAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Gordon Tassi
Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2001 10:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Neg film for scanning
Mark: Re: 3M film.
According to the people at Photo Works (used to be Seattle Film Works)
their
negative color film is mad
Richard,
Thanks for the updating of my information on the subject and for filling in
some of the holes while correcting the errors. From what you have said I
take it that the movie film is no longer used by these processors; does this
mean that they are now using standard still films which any
of in terms of rhetorical
question or in search of a logical speculation rather than an empirical
answer.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Richard N. Moyer
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2001 4:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Neg film
Woah! What about RGB Color Labs in the world's film capital, Hollywood,
CA.? So far as I know, their address is still 816 No. Highland Ave.,
Hollywood, CA 90038.
At 05:00 PM 03/26/2001 -0500, you wrote:
Richard,
Thanks for the updating of my information on the subject and for filling in
some
From: "Laurie Solomon" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Never a problem with me - especially if the information is informative or
interesting.
I hate to sound stupid; but I want to check and see if you mean what I think
you mean when you speak of CN in relation to film. Are you speaking about a
chromogenic
: filmscanners: Neg film for scanning
You may want to check out this link for the latest and greatest from Mother
Kodak as far as 35mm motion picture stock goes... this particular link is to
a
250 ASA DAYLIGHT neg stock...
http://www.kodak.com/US/en/motion/products/negative/5246.shtml
Mike M.
Laurie
myself.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Michael Moore
Sent: Monday, March 26, 2001 8:00 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Neg film for scanning
You may want to check out this link for the latest and greatest from
Arthur said:
Mike is right. There are no "supermarket" brands.
Does anyone know who makes the Jessops neg. films, which are on sale here in New
Zealand?
Colin Maddock
Unless they have stopped doing it, Ferannia and Agfa have
supplied a lot of the 'house-brand' films.
Hersch
At 07:59 PM 03/24/2001 -0800, you wrote:
Mike is right. There are no
supermarket brands. 3M/Scotch used to be a main
supplier of these no-brand films, but I think they left that biz.
So
CTED]
Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2001 4:59 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Neg film for scanning
Mike is right. There are no "supermarket" brands.
3M/Scotch used to be
a main supplier of these no-brand films, but I think they
left that biz.
So most, if not all North American supermark
"Mark T." [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have a few supermarket brands down here, and it seems to be always
'Made
in Germany', so I had assumed it was Agfa..?
Huh. I thought most of the no-name brands in Oz were rebadged Fuji, but I
never knew for sure. I'd rather buy the name brand and know
At 20:59 25/03/2001 +1000, you wrote:
"Mark T." [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
We have a few supermarket brands down here, and it seems to be always
'Made
in Germany', so I had assumed it was Agfa..?
Huh. I thought most of the no-name brands in Oz were rebadged Fuji, but I
never knew for sure.
Mark: Re: 3M film.
According to the people at Photo Works (used to be Seattle Film Works) their
negative color film is made by 3M. I have used them for some time with very
good processing results. (The are one of the US houses that develops and
prints film and if you wish will return a roll
Gordon, I believe that Imation is the new name for 3M's film
business. I think they are a wholly-owned subsidiary of 3M.
Hersch
At 11:13 AM 03/25/2001 -0500, you wrote:
Mark: Re: 3M film.
According to the people at Photo Works (used to be Seattle Film
Works) their
negative color film is made by
yourself or have a custom one made.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Gordon Tassi
Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2001 10:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Neg film for scanning
Mark: Re: 3M film.
According to the people
In all probability it could just as well be Konica film - also from Germany.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Rob Geraghty
Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2001 5:00 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Neg film for scanning
"
a custom one made.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On
Behalf Of Gordon Tassi
Sent: Sunday, March 25, 2001 10:13 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Neg film for scanning
Mark: Re: 3M film.
According to the people at Photo Works (used
I'm surprised to hear this, as I recall 3M informing me they were out of
this biz, but I won't argue it. Imation is now the separate spinoff of
3M for their media division.
Art
Gordon Tassi wrote:
Mark: Re: 3M film.
According to the people at Photo Works (used to be Seattle Film
Yes, Alan, 3M did have a plant in Italy for some time.
I don't know what is going on in the European markets these days, as I
haven't lived there in 20 odd years now. I imagine someone else who is
there now might know, however.
Art
Alan Tyson wrote:
I have in my hand a Tesco (leading UK
I knew I had forgotten someone. Yes, you are absolutely correct, I was
trying to remember the third major doing this, which is of course, Agfa!
I haven't noted much from Ferannia in recent years, at least in Canada.
Black's Photo here uses (last time I checked, a few years ago) Fuji.
Thanks
scratching.
Edwin
- Original Message -
From: "Alan Tyson" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2001 1:04 AM
Subject: filmscanners: Neg film for scanning
I've been trawling in the archive
(http://phi.res.cse.dmu.ac.uk/htdig) for the discussion I
remem
Alan Many of the so called generic or "supermarket brand" are made
by major manufacturers (konica, etc.) It sounds to me like your
scratches and muck problem is a Laboratory problem, not a film
problem... try to find a good custom lab where they use a dip and dunk
processor as opposed to a
Sorry Alan,
I don't get scratches or dust on my negs as I process my own.
Water to mix chemistry goes through a 2 stage filtration system as does
the rinse water.I use a Colenta rotary discard machine and "one shot"
chemistry and a well filtered drying cabinet.Favourite C41 dev Is a
Tetenal
When I read the Kodak specs carefully, the anti-scratch coating is mentioned for
the 400 speed Supra, but not for the 100 speed Supra. Also, I was told the 100
speed has just been renamed from Portra. The impression I got from Kodak was
that the 400 and 800 speed were new formulations.
Edwin
I've been using Supra 400 as my default film for most of
the past year. Previoulsy I mainly used Kodak Royal Gold 400.
I'm getting my film processed by Shutterfly ( they offer
free developing)
http://www.shutterfly.com/index.jsp
and haven't noticed any big difference one way or the tuther re;
st the 400, are "optimized
for scanning", and the optimization must mean more than just the
anti-scratch coating of the emulsion.
Edwin
- Original Message -
From: "jimhayes" [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, March 24, 2001 12:17 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: N
I've been trawling in the archive
(http://phi.res.cse.dmu.ac.uk/htdig) for the discussion I
remember here 3-4 months ago about Kodak's "Supra" neg
films, with allegedly good characteristics for scanning, and
a protective layer. The conclusions were ambiguous then.
Like Michael Wilkinson who's
34 matches
Mail list logo
