[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: 'Claudiu Falub' [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, July 06, 2001 9:56 AM
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Nikon LS IV/Nikoscan 3.0
You can grab it from me by ftp at
62.31.210.174 username nikon password nikon
James Grove
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Nikon LS IV/Nikoscan 3.0
James,
is this still on your ftp site?
I have two goes at downloading 3.1 from the Nikon site but it keeps
bombing out. i would be *very* grateful if you could give me temp access
to download it from your site instead?
best
Raphael Bustin wrote:
A discussion on technical merits is
what I expect. Recitations of unfounded,
inflammatory opinions, alleged regional
allegiances, pop-psychology and broad
generalizations serve no useful purpose.
rafe b.
Respectfully, IY(perhaps H)O.
Art
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, July 10, 2001 7:34 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Nikon LS IV/Nikoscan 3.0
Dave King wrote:
Rafe, you are right on the money.
Dave
Luckily, most lists aren't much about money. ;-)
Art
rafeb wrote:
At 06:11 AM 7/7/01 -0700, Art Entlich wrote:
You know, some people have had problems with Nikon software... a LOT of
problems.
And quite a few have complained about Polaroid's
scanner software as well.
Not having their scanner or need for their software...
So why add
At 02:46 AM 7/9/01 -0700, Art Entlich wrote:
snip
My comment, based upon fact, was that Nikon's scanner software has had a
history of many problems, and that these same problems extended to
several Nikon peripherals their scanners work with.
Oh, poop, Art. Go to the PhotographyReview web site
PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Nikon LS IV/Nikoscan 3.0
Date: Mon, 09 Jul 2001 02:46:40 -0700
rafeb wrote:
At 06:11 AM 7/7/01 -0700, Art Entlich wrote:
You know, some people have had problems with Nikon software... a LOT of
problems.
And quite a few have
Rafe wrote:
By singling out Nikon as a company writing lousy scanner
software, others might presume that Canon, Minolta,
Polaroid, Acer, HP, Leaf, Kodak or Brand Z must be doing
a better job in that department.
Poor documentation is at least 1/2 the problem in these complaints--I'd
direct
good documentation cost money, and its not a sexy feature..ie. it will not
sell more scanners. So that's why you see poor documentation..
Lets be honest here ok?
Lynn Allen [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Poor documentation is at least 1/2 the problem in these complaints--I'd
direct anyone
At 20:23 09-07-01 +, Lynn Allen wrote:
The main point is that regardless of how *monolithic* sofware companies
believe themselves to be (Microsoft and Adobe come to mind), and how
*infallable* some engineers occasionally consider themselves to be (no
present company included or excluded),
Rafe, you are right on the money.
Dave
- Original Message -
From: Raphael Bustin [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, July 09, 2001 7:11 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Nikon LS IV/Nikoscan 3.0
On Mon, 9 Jul 2001, Lynn Allen wrote:
Is the criticism valid? Yeah
Ray Amos wrote:
Claudiu Falub wrote:
Many thanks to all who answered to my request. It seems this is one very
effective list. I downloaded the software and hope to solve my nightmare. I
really don't understand why a famous company (read Nikon) can produce such a
garbage (Nikonscan
At 06:11 AM 7/7/01 -0700, Art Entlich wrote:
You know, some people have had problems with Nikon software... a LOT of
problems.
And quite a few have complained about Polaroid's
scanner software as well.
Not having their scanner or need for their software...
So why add fuel to the fire, Art?
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, July 08, 2001 7:59 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Re: filmscanners: Nikon LS IV/Nikoscan 3.0
At 06:11 AM 7/7/01 -0700, Art Entlich wrote:
You know, some people have had problems with Nikon software... a LOT of
problems.
And quite a few have complained
plugin and
contrasty negative scannings.
Mikael Risedal
From: Hemingway, David J [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: filmscanners: Nikon LS IV/Nikoscan 3.0
Date: Sun, 8 Jul 2001 15:41:19 -0400
I will say that some folks have not liked PolaColor
: 06 July 2001 09:29
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: filmscanners: Nikon LS IV/Nikoscan 3.0
Hi!
I've recently purchased a Nikon LS IV scanner. It was delivered with
Nikonscan 3.0. While the scanner is ok, I don't like the software, since
it crashes all the time and I have to restart my computer
Hi!
I've recently purchased a Nikon LS IV scanner. It was delivered with
Nikonscan 3.0. While the scanner is ok, I don't like the software, since it
crashes all the time and I have to restart my computer and I hate that. I
heard the new version 3.1 is better. How can I get it? The salesman told
At 10:29 AM 7/6/01 +0200, you wrote:
Hi!
I've recently purchased a Nikon LS IV scanner. It was delivered with
Nikonscan 3.0. While the scanner is ok, I don't like the software, since it
crashes all the time and I have to restart my computer and I hate that. I
heard the new version 3.1 is better.
Many thanks to all who answered to my request. It seems this is one very
effective list. I downloaded the software and hope to solve my nightmare. I
really don't understand why a famous company (read Nikon) can produce such a
garbage (Nikonscan 3.0) ...
Cladiu Falub
James Grove wrote:
You can
On Fri, 6 Jul 2001, Claudiu Falub wrote:
Many thanks to all who answered to my request. It seems this is one very
effective list. I downloaded the software and hope to solve my nightmare. I
really don't understand why a famous company (read Nikon) can produce such a
garbage (Nikonscan 3.0)
Claudiu Falub wrote:
Many thanks to all who answered to my request. It seems this is one very
effective list. I downloaded the software and hope to solve my nightmare. I
really don't understand why a famous company (read Nikon) can produce such a
garbage (Nikonscan 3.0) ...
Claudiu,
Ray,
my software ??!! did you write it for Nikon? If not, I hardly think it's
your software ;-) If you did then i have a few suggestions for you! I DO
live within a 100 miles of greensboro and i'd love to have you come over and
have a beer and i'll tell you how I think it could be
Lawrence Smith wrote:
Ray,
my software ??!! did you write it for Nikon? If not, I hardly think it's
your software ;-) If you did then i have a few suggestions for you! I DO
live within a 100 miles of greensboro and i'd love to have you come over and
have a beer and i'll tell you how
-
From: Ray Amos [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, July 06, 2001 3:24 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Nikon LS IV/Nikoscan 3.0
Claudiu Falub wrote:
Many thanks to all who answered to my request. It seems this is one very
effective list. I downloaded the software
Sent: 06 July 2001 23:24
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Nikon LS IV/Nikoscan 3.0
Claudiu Falub wrote:
Many thanks to all who answered to my request. It seems this is one very
effective list. I downloaded the software and hope to solve my
nightmare. I
really don't
Claudiu is obviously frustrated with his software, and I can understand how
that can happen. I'm sure that just about everyone on this list knows that
scanner software is notorious for being poorly documented, or buggy, or
substandard in some way. Most people who buy a film scanner are doing so
26 matches
Mail list logo
