--- tflash [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The blue channel of the pad lock image shows what
appears to be jpeg
artifacts, but none of the other channels do. I know
the blue channel is
typically the noisiest channel of a scan, but I
forget why. Isn't it because
the CCD elements are least
On Thu, 19 Jul 2001, tflash wrote:
on 7/18/01 11:11 PM, rafeb wrote:
I've posted a few small scans from my 8000 ED at:
http://www.channel1.com/users/rafeb/scanner_test4.htm
Rafe,
I looked at your scans in PS, and they are impressive, but one thing I saw
raises a somewhat
Fantastic comparisons, Rafe. And much more Real Life than anything from
the mfgrs' publicity departments. Thanks.
From: rafeb [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: filmscanners: On A More Positive Note
Date: Wed, 18 Jul 2001 23:11:04 -0400
I've posted
I haven't looked at that scan channel-by-channel.
It's not a perfect scan, by any means, but was
meant to show what comes out of this scanner
with zero effort.
If you'd like a higher-res scan of any part of
this image, I'd be happy to email it to you.
That's kind of you Rafe, but not
I've posted a few small scans from my 8000 ED at:
http://www.channel1.com/users/rafeb/scanner_test4.htm
(Photos of shed, and snow-covered boats.)
These might explain why some of us are pretty
excited about this machine, in spite of all the
negative talk 'round here.
This was a totally
on 7/18/01 11:11 PM, rafeb wrote:
I've posted a few small scans from my 8000 ED at:
http://www.channel1.com/users/rafeb/scanner_test4.htm
Rafe,
I looked at your scans in PS, and they are impressive, but one thing I saw
raises a somewhat generic question for me.
The blue channel of the pad
