Re: filmscanners: Re: Nikonscan v VueScan

2001-11-23 Thread EdHamrick
In a message dated 11/22/2001 8:14:12 PM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > Setting Color|white point and Gamma is equivalent, in Photoshop terms, to > using Auto Levels and the grey dropper. No, they aren't related at all. The "Color|White point (%)" option controls how much of the image clip

RE: filmscanners: Re: Nikonscan v VueScan

2001-11-22 Thread Jawed Ashraf
PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Maris V. Lidaka, > Sr. > Sent: 23 November 2001 01:54 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: filmscanners: Re: Nikonscan v VueScan > > > The L channel should not change colors - it is Luminosity only. > The A & B channels contain the colors, s

Re: filmscanners: Re: Nikonscan v VueScan

2001-11-22 Thread Maris V. Lidaka, Sr.
sday, November 22, 2001 7:14 PM Subject: RE: filmscanners: Re: Nikonscan v VueScan | Yes. L is quite interesting. A big move with L gets you funny colours too. | You end up having to balance a contrast change in both the L channel and the | "R, G, B" channel to get colour

RE: filmscanners: Re: Nikonscan v VueScan

2001-11-22 Thread Jawed Ashraf
--Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 22 November 2001 15:32 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: filmscanners: Re: Nikonscan v VueScan > > > In a message dated 11/22/2001 5:02:06 AM EST, [EMAIL PR

RE: filmscanners: Re: Nikonscan v VueScan

2001-11-22 Thread Jawed Ashraf
TED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Maris V. Lidaka, > Sr. > Sent: 22 November 2001 17:50 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: filmscanners: Re: Nikonscan v VueScan > > > Have you tried converting to LAB and then adjusting the curve in > the L channel only

Re: filmscanners: Re: Nikonscan v VueScan

2001-11-22 Thread Maris V. Lidaka, Sr.
y, November 22, 2001 4:00 AM Subject: RE: filmscanners: Re: Nikonscan v VueScan | Yes I've tried curves of all kinds. I just wish I hadn't pursued the "flat | is best" school, because it was a very serious waste of time (well, OK, I | learnt to reject it). [remainder snipped]

Re: filmscanners: Re: Nikonscan v VueScan

2001-11-22 Thread EdHamrick
In a message dated 11/22/2001 5:02:06 AM EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > I'd just like to encourage some peeps not to think forensically about > dynamic range when they're scanning. It's not hard to make VueScan produce very, very contrasty results. Just experiment with "Color|White point (%)

RE: filmscanners: Re: Nikonscan v VueScan

2001-11-22 Thread Jawed Ashraf
.. And it misses out on the "scale" thing that I like... Jawed > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Colin Maddock > Sent: 22 November 2001 07:12 > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: filmscanners: Re: Nikonscan v VueSca

filmscanners: Re: Nikonscan v VueScan

2001-11-22 Thread Colin Maddock
>Jawed wrote:.By vitality I don't merely mean >contrast/black-point/white-point. I also >mean the nature of the tonality of the image. Something related to the >question of "gamma" and also the inherent S-shaped response that all films >have (so far as I know). So, all the effort I put