Slide film can be tricky to scan. I'm not sure I'd like to let it fly on
auto, which I assume is the only reason for having a slide feeder.
I haven't been following Nikon scanners, but in the past, they have had
depth of field issues, i.e. difficulty with curved film.
You have a different goal
This particular Gigabyte has 8 sata ports with two FRAIDs. I figure once
the horsepower of the machine is not enough, it will be at the very
least a good server. I lost count of the USB portsl but I believe it has
12. Also two 1394B (yes, the 800mbps) firewire. Also two lans. Dual
bios, so you can
On 05/06/2006 James L. Sims wrote:
I am not impressed with ASUS web support. After all the great reviews
about ASUS, that was a letdown.
IME Asus are one of the better mfr's, with generally solid boards and a
decent record of fixing things that don't quite work. I have used them a
lot - 3 here
I've built three machines using the GA K8N Ultra-9 board, one for myself, 2
for others. So far it's about the most stable board I've ever used, runs
all AMD 64 single and dual core processors up to the FX60 and is happy with
nearly anything you throw at it.
The other two users are equally
vary from one port
to another)
On these points, I concur.
Original Message
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Charles Knox
Sent: Saturday, June 03, 2006 8:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Vuescan and 64bit Windows - Ed's reply
My 2c
: [filmscanners] Re: Vuescan and 64bit Windows - Ed's reply
My 2c cents here: USB printers, scanners and other
peripherals that plug into the wall or are battery-powered
typically don't draw power from the USB port so are not affected by
the 500mA limit.
The 7-in-1 card reader may be marginal in its
On 04/06/2006 James L. Sims wrote:
But just as the restart was completing, I encountered the
much feared blue screen. I wont bore anyone with the details but I
finally was up and running some seven hours later, with the updated
drivers.
Oh I hate weekends like that :-}
Too often, by half.
Tony Sleep wrote:
On 04/06/2006 James L. Sims wrote:
But just as the restart was completing, I encountered the
much feared blue screen. I wont bore anyone with the details but I
finally was up and running some seven hours later, with the updated
drivers.
Oh I hate weekends like that :-}
Charles,
After I went through a miserable seven hours fighting a blue screen
error on startup after the first attempt at installing new chipset
drivers, I finally managed to get the new drivers installed and the
reader seems to be functioning properly.
I have responded to your questions below.
FWIW, I don't build PCs using Asus mobos. I find I get a better bang for
you buck with Gigabyte. I've built two systems using the GA-k8n Ultra-9
(x64 and Suse 10.0)
If you are using onboard raid (often known as FRAID for fake raid), it
won't be blazing. I use the onboard raid myself as I really
I guess I should say Asus mobos anymore. It used to be my mobo of choice.
http://www.iometer.org/
To some degree you can measure disk i/o with the program, though it
really flogs your whole system.
gary wrote:
FWIW, I don't build PCs using Asus mobos. I find I get a better bang for
you buck
My previous machine had a Gigabyte MB and I really liked it. So far,
I'm not impressed. It's also my first experience with Nvidia chipset
drivers - I was ready for anything else, given my experience with VIA.
I may go back to Gigabyte, sooner than later.
Jim
gary wrote:
I guess I should say
On 02/06/2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
So, the technique works for the KM Scan Elite 5400 II, but doesn't
work
for the Nikon LS-8000. Maybe Ed could find a fix for that.
Ed's reply:-
On 03/06/2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Here's a more complete scanners.inf file. I thought the extra
On 02/06/2006 James L. Sims wrote:
I have a 32-bit device on a
computer running Windows XP 32-bit that regularly fails to see one
device unless it's activated and the computer restarted - much like
the
behavior that I experienced with Win 2K.
That's normal and correct behaviour for SCSI. You
Thanks for this. I downloaded the expanded scanners.inf file and used
it to load the Nikon LS-8000. I read scanners.inf file in Notepad and
saw the LS-8000 listed so it looked promising.
The scanner, again, loads fine. But even with the Nikon LS-8000 loaded
using this new file, Vuescan still
On 03/06/2006 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But even with the Nikon LS-8000
loaded
using this new file, Vuescan still crashes the system immediately upon
starting. I wish the blue screen of death didn't pass so quickly so I
could read what the issue was. Loading the KM 5400 II and my Epson
http://www.sysinternals.com/utilities/bluescreen.html
I have no first had knowledge of this program, but I can vouch for
sysinternals.com in general. See if it capture your BSOD.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Thanks for this. I downloaded the expanded scanners.inf file and used
it to load the
These are USB devices, Tony. I was told by a so-called computer guru
that this problem was corrected in XP. It could be that the device is
incorrectly installed - it's a USB 2 device but its speed, or slowness,
indicated that Win XP thinks it an early USB device. I've tried
uninstalling the USB
On 03/06/2006 James L. Sims wrote:
These are USB devices, Tony.
Ah, OK. That is weird, then. I've used USB USB2 a lot and not had any
problems like that. Is the controller on the motherboard? If so, it might
be worth looking for updated motherboard drivers, or trying a PCI card USB
adaptor
: Saturday, June 03, 2006 11:31 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Vuescan and 64bit Windows - Ed's reply
These are USB devices, Tony. I was told by a so-called
computer guru that this problem was corrected in XP. It
could be that the device is incorrectly installed - it's
On 03/06/2006 Tony Sleep wrote:
Is the controller on the motherboard? If so, it might
be worth looking for updated motherboard drivers, or trying a PCI
card USB
adaptor instead.
Sorry, too much hurry. I could have been clearer. I meant 'updated BIOS
and chipset drivers' for the mobo. Back to
On 03/06/2006 Laurie Solomon wrote:
If you have connected the devices to an unpowered hub
Oh yes, what Laurie says, in spades. I sometimes forget there are such
things as unpowered hubs. They're more or less completely useless. A
single USB port is specced at 0.5amps, and a large proportion of
That's and Idea. Thanks! I usually check for updates but I haven't
checked the Asus website for the new board.
Jim
Tony Sleep wrote:
On 03/06/2006 James L. Sims wrote:
These are USB devices, Tony.
Ah, OK. That is weird, then. I've used USB USB2 a lot and not had any
problems like that.
PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of James L. Sims
Sent: Saturday, June 03, 2006 11:31 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Vuescan and 64bit Windows - Ed's reply
These are USB devices, Tony. I was told by a so-called
computer guru that this problem was corrected in XP
it back
on for the system to recognize it.
Original Message
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of James L. Sims
Sent: Saturday, June 03, 2006 11:31 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Vuescan and 64bit Windows - Ed's reply
These are USB devices
03, 2006 8:15 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Vuescan and 64bit Windows - Ed's reply
My 2c cents here: USB printers, scanners and other
peripherals that plug into the wall or are battery-powered
typically don't draw power from the USB port so are not affected by
the 500mA
You are able to use your 5400 II on x64? I have Vuescan running on x64
but can't load/install the scanner on the system. How did you use Ed's
.inf file to install the scanner? This is great if you were able to
do this. Thanks!
gary wrote:
I got a call back from Konica Minolta regarding the
What OS are you using?
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I tried this and it doesn't work. I right-clicked the scanner.inf file
and installed it. Vuescan and the OS still can't see or use the scanner
(that goes for both the KM Scan Elite 5400 II and the Nikon LS-8000).
I've tried it a few different
Windows XP 64 should see it, however, I have a 32-bit device on a
computer running Windows XP 32-bit that regularly fails to see one
device unless it's activated and the computer restarted - much like the
behavior that I experienced with Win 2K.
Jim
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Windows XP
It worked! I'll be d*mned! ;-)
To have the 5400 II functional under x64 is great. Thanks for the tip.
By the way, I also tried it with the Nikon LS-8000. Windows x64 takes
the scanners.inf file to load the scanner, but as soon as you start up
Vuescan the whole system immediately crashes (the
Tony,
Thanks for looking into the 64-bit capability of vuescan. It was nice
to hear from Ed once again on this list. This discussion has brought
about a kind of old home week, hasn't it, and it's been nice to hear
from a few others, as well.
By the way, Tony, please check your clock, this
On 31/05/2006 James L. Sims wrote:
By the way, Tony, please check your clock, this message was time
stamped
3/31/06 1:05 PM.
Yes, sorry about that. I had been using some accounts s/w for which I
needed to fake the time date, and forgot to set it back.
Tony Sleep
AFAIK, VueScan works by using low-level calls to the scanner's interface,
and is independent of the OEM driver software. Ancient SCSI scanners work
perfectly on my XP box (with the ASPI layer installed).
Les
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
Since no one else has answered this yet, I'm going to go out on a limb,
(I don't use Vuescan, and storage is not my strong point) and assume it
has to do with how your hard drive was formatted, and which definition
of MB is being used, although it does seem like quite a difference.
As hard
Thomas Maugham [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just scanned a negative and got the following information from
VueScan: 5576 x 3669 pixels 4000 dpi 1.39 x 0.917 inch 92.1 mb. The
size of the file on my hard drive is 119.885kb or about 119.9 mb. Why
the discrepancy between what VueScan says the file
119.9 mb
Tthat's a very small file - just over a tenth of a bit :-)
Peter
Unsubscribe by mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED], with 'unsubscribe filmscanners'
or 'unsubscribe filmscanners_digest' (as appropriate) in
Just guessing; but it may have something to do with the way VueScan and your
OS read file sizes and count bits as well as what they add or do not add to
the file size in terms of metadata overhead, etc. and effects of the file
allocation system employed on the hard drive.
-Original
John Matturri wrote:
I keep trying to upgrade vuescan but all versions after about 7.6.28 (up
to 61) are unable to keep a manual crop, set using the mouse, in the
final scan. The crop works fine for a preview but when the scan itself
is made it shifts to maximum crop, throwing all values off
LAURIE SOLOMON wrote:
It is the Output tab not the Color tab.
Na, in the output tab you only specify that you want a profile. You wrote
yourself that the profile is set in the color tab when quoting the help file.
And as Henk wrote, the pro version is needed to make color space settings
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Andreas Siegert
Sent: Friday, September 26, 2003 4:29 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Vuescan color space question
LAURIE SOLOMON wrote:
It is the Output tab not the Color tab.
Na, in the output tab you only specify that you
On 09/26/03 2:00 AM, Tony Sleep [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
But I set VS to preview @4000ppi then 'scan from
preview', which is much quicker since the scanner only makes one pass. You
could try that.
This is a great time saver for batch scanning. But Vuescan newbies should
note that this option
Subject: [filmscanners] Vuescan color space question
Date: Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 10:53:53AM -0400
Quoting Ellis Vener:
My question is: How do I reset Vuescan so it is natively working in
Adobe RGB(1998) ?
You can set the color output space in the color tab of vuescan to adobe rgb...
cheers
afx
On Thursday, September 25, 2003, at 10:59 AM, Andreas Siegert wrote:
Subject: [filmscanners] Vuescan color space question
Date: Thu, Sep 25, 2003 at 10:53:53AM -0400
Quoting Ellis Vener:
My question is: How do I reset Vuescan so it is natively working in
Adobe RGB(1998) ?
You can set the
Look under the Output Tab. There should be an item where you can set the
color space option for outputted TIFF or JPG files. I quote from the User
Guide:
TIFF profile
This specifies whether to embed an ICC color profile into the TIFF file.
This is primarily useful if you're using Photoshop(TM).
My question is: How do I reset Vuescan so it is natively working in
Adobe RGB(1998) ?
You can set the color output space in the color tab of vuescan to
adobe rgb...
I can? Where? When I click on the the color tab I have these options
Maybe it is time to get a newer version of vuescan, whcih
It is the Output tab not the Color tab.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Ellis Vener
Sent: Thursday, September 25, 2003 10:25 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Vuescan color space question
I can? Where? When I click
In output I can either check the TIFF profile to be either on or off.
There are no other options.
I cannot find the Color|Output color space option.
I am currently using VueScan 7.6.62 which I purchased this past
Saturday.
Do I need to upgrade to the professional edition of Vuescan?
On
Just speculating; but could it possibly be that you have some other setting
under one of the other tabs (i.e. the output tab) that is causing the
final scan to default to a different aspect ratio or a different cropping.
I have not used Vuescan in a little while but do not recall experiencing
this
Do I need to upgrade to the professional edition of Vuescan?
Yes. Only the professional version has the ability to use color spaces.
See https://www.hamrick.com/reg.html
For VueScan related problems an questions the newsgroup
news:comp.periphs.scanners is the place to be. Ed Hamrick himself
John,
I would hazard a guess that vuescan.ini has been corrupted and is not being
overwritten as you update with later versions.
From memory the fix is to delete vuescan.ini and it will be recreated with
default values when you restart.
ATB
John
- Original Message -
From: John Matturri
Julian Vrieslander [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Recent versions of Vuescan contain provisions for building custom ICC
scanner profiles and custom ICC film profiles, using IT8 reference targets.
Thanks for the info Julian! Very interesting. It would be nice to be able
to make profiles for things
On 09/17/03 8:09 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Austin Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How does the color calibration in VS work?
The scanner profiles are generated by Ed. The film profiles are from the
Kodak PhotoCD profile set ie. the profiles which the Kodak scanner
Original message
Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2003 21:23:30 -0700
From: Frank Paris [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [filmscanners] RE: Vuescan vs Insight: what is
better about Vuescan? (was 24 bit vs more)
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Last I checked the
slide results were fairly comparable but the negatives
The big advantage to Vuescan for me is that it is far more aggressive in altering
exposure
times than most scanner software. This can lead to rather extended scans, but it can
also
get highlights out of thick negs that absolutely stump other programs. Polacolor in
particular is absolutely
: [filmscanners] RE: Vuescan vs Insight: what is better
aboutVuescan? (was 24 bit vs more)
I am scanning slides almost exclusively. I got VueScan as a
benefit of being
a VuePrint purchaser years ago. I got free upgrades for a long time, but
they ended that with a version just above my 7.5.41.
Stan
For a brief period a few months back, there was some problem, as I recall,
with serial number activation. He had to make some kind of changes because of
some people generating false numbers or something like that. I e-mailed Ed and
he gladly gave me a new serial number when he checked my data on
and
marketed before coming out with Vuescan.
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 6:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [filmscanners] RE: Vuescan vs Insight: what is better
aboutVuescan? (was 24
: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 5:02 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [filmscanners] RE: Vuescan vs Insight: what is better
aboutVuescan? (was 24 bit vs more)
I have DL'ed the latest version. When I use my old Vuescan serial
number, I
still get the $$$ watermarks on my scans.
-Original
https://www.hamrick.com/rep.html
Go to this site and get updated serial number.
Thanks
Ramesh
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 7:02 PM
To: Nagaraj, Ramesh
Subject: [filmscanners] RE: Vuescan vs Insight: what
Austin Franklin [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
How does the color calibration in VS work?
The scanner profiles are generated by Ed. The film profiles are from the
Kodak PhotoCD profile set ie. the profiles which the Kodak scanner uses
when making PhotoCDs. That's why (sadly) there's no profiles for
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
For the SS4000: I have tried many times to use the Vuescan software rather
than Insight but I keep returning to Insight. First, I find Insight
significantly faster than Vuescan. Second, I find the controls in Insight to
be just easier to use.
I still have Vuescan on my
I am scanning slides almost exclusively. I got VueScan as a benefit of being
a VuePrint purchaser years ago. I got free upgrades for a long time, but
they ended that with a version just above my 7.5.41. I would have to buy the
program again now and although it's not very expensive, I just haven't
On 09/16/03 7:24 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To be fair, I still am using version 7.5.41. Does the latest 7.6.XX offer
significantly more features or functionality? I got the last free upgrade
before Ed started charging again.
You can look at the changes history on Ed's
I am scanning slides almost exclusively. I got VueScan as a
benefit of being
a VuePrint purchaser years ago. I got free upgrades for a long time, but
they ended that with a version just above my 7.5.41.
Stan - so did I, but I still get free upgrades...?
tim
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Petru Lauric
Sent: Tuesday, September 16, 2003 8:04 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Vuescan vs Insight: what is
better about Vuescan? (was 24 bit vs more)
Last I checked
Matt,
I use Vuescan with my LS4000, but after I have scanned the film with
NikonScan!
I scan with NS (color management off and y=1 for highbit scans and 2.2 for
lowbit scans) so I can use ICE (Vuescans implementation of ICE is not as
good IMO). Then I do all the color conversions in vuescan
Matt Haber [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
seems like vuescan might be useful, but here are my gripes. maybe
somebody can set me straight
my hardware is the nikon ls 8000.
I really liked Vuescan for the Epson 2450, but don't find it worth the
effort for the Nikon.
It seems to be very kludgy
is probably more personal taste than anything
tim
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Maris V. Lidaka
Sr.
Sent: Sunday, September 29, 2002 10:26 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: vuescan
Software tuned to film seems
parameters [the newsgroup is BIG], e.g. 2710
- Original Message -
From: Ken Durling [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, August 29, 2002 12:01 AM
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Vuescan/FS2710
On Wed, 28 Aug 2002 12:07:17 -0600, you wrote:
I would like to monitor
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Vuescan/FS2710
On Wed, 28 Aug 2002 08:40:37 +1200, you wrote:
The release notes on the latest version of Vuescan - 7.5.43 - list as
one feature, fixed problem with FS2710. Any idea what that problem
was, or is there a more in-depth version of the release
I completely missed your kind offer - thanks. And thanks to everyone
who responded. I got zero response form comp.periphs.scanners, and
surprisingly, no response from an e-mail to Ed. But I'm sure he's
swamped. So you guys are it!
Ed's replies tend not to be immediate so you may still
On 7/14/02 2:53 PM, Alan Harper [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I must say that I have (almost) never had a app freeze up so much that I
can't change to other apps.
I would look for a USB device, or firewire device, that stops responding,
or a hard disk that won't wake up. There is a long
I must say that I have (almost) never had a app freeze up so much that I
can't change to other apps.
I would look for a USB device, or firewire device, that stops responding,
or a hard disk that won't wake up. There is a long discussion on
Macintouch about the problems resulting from Maxtor hard
Sorry - but are you guys referring to the Monitor Color Space pull
down under the Color tab in Vuescan? I can't find anything that is
labeled Monitor Profile. Am I missing it?
On Mon, 24 Jun 2002 12:31:27 -0400, you wrote:
On Mon, 24 Jun 2002 09:01:00 -0500, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Oh
Julian
Thanks for this answer and for the previous one on the OSX compatability
issue with Vuescan.
I shall create a new profile with Photocal and put the .icc extension at the
end.
Simon
Julian Vrieslander wrote:
On 6/20/02 8:04 PM, Simon Lamb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just downloaded
On 6/20/02 6:05 PM, Simon Lamb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There was an old restriction when using Vuescan on a Mac (might have applied
to PC also) with Nikon scanners that certain files had to be deleted or
extensions removed or Vuescan would not recognise the scanner. Is this
still the case
On Thu, Jun 20, 2002 at 12:18:27PM -0230, michael shaffer wrote:
Isidoro writes ...
I noted, using Vuescan, that scanning with infrared cleaning (Light), the
corrections that Vuescan makes seems to be too much bright, producing
artifacts. This is particularly evident in ligth areas.
On 6/20/02 8:04 PM, Simon Lamb [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I just downloaded the latest version of Vuescan (7.5.34). In the Colour tab
I selected 'ICC Profile' in the list of options next to Monitor Colour
Space. I then wanted to select my custom monitor profile that I created
using Photocal
There is another gotcha for OS X that I have found for some USB
scanners, and may exist for Firewire scanners. If you are running OS 9
(Classic), the drivers there can interfere with VueScan communicating
with the scanner. Depending on I don't know what, sometimes you have to
reboot if you let OS
Ken writes ...
Working with BW negatives, is there a combination of settings of BP,
WP and Brightness - and possibly other settings - that would
theoretically give you an image that is unaltered of your negative -
similar to putting the neg in the enlarger? ...
I would think you'd want
On Wed, 12 Jun 2002 16:01:49 -0700, you wrote:
That is to say without image inversion (neg-to-positive)?
Would Device-Media type-Image work for this?
From the help file:
[For] Image, no film correction is used, and the cropped
file will look as much like the original image as possible.
If
Personally I prefer Nikonscan 3 to any scan driver I've used, especially for
color negatives. With Nikonscan set up correctly for color management you
may be amazed at color neg scan quality just using Nikonscan's defaults.
PhotoCal and Spyder aren't that expensive, why not do it?
Dave
-
Tomek Zakrzewski wrote:
I know VueScan quite well, I use it with my Agfa Arcus 1200 flatbed scanner,
I I appreciate many of it's qualities, I can even live with its user
interface :-)
But putting UI aside, I'm most interested in the capabilities of those
programmes in delivering good scans from
]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, May 30, 2002 8:20 PM
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: VueScan vs. SilverFast with negs
[snipped}
- VueScan - as I said I have only used it for a few times, mainly to try
to compare the results with the SF scans. In general I got very flat
images, even after adjusting
John:
Ever since I started to scan color negatives with vuescan
(on SS4000) I periodically get scans that differ greatly
from the preview. Usually with a much narrower range of
values and odd casts, often a bright, almost solarized blue
cast in white highlights and more recently an overall green
Julian Vrieslander wrote:
Try setting Prefs Min Dimension to a higher number. I typically have it
set to about 1000. But note the explanation in the User Guide
This option specifies the minimum width and height of the displayed data.
The larger this number, the more you can zoom into an
PC, Win98 original edition, 128MB Ram, latest Vuescan, it occurs usually after a
number,
though not a definite number, of scans.
The memory theory is quite attractive for me given that in two weeks or so I'll be
getting
delivery on a new computer with 1.5GB of RAM. This happens on relatively
]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Arthur Entlich
Sent: Saturday, May 04, 2002 5:24 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: Vuescan and multipass algorithm
This sounds very interesting. Can you step through the process in a bit
more detail? Which version of Photoshop are you using
Åke writes ...
...
The output images seem to be calculated by averaging the value
in each pixel. The result is a
What do you mean ... smooth noise level, but no real noise elimination.?
Averaging really should eliminate noise. That is, averaging is a result of
adding and normalization ...
This sounds very interesting. Can you step through the process in a bit
more detail? Which version of Photoshop are you using, and how does one
Apply Image in Darken Mode, what menu items and tools are you using
exactly. I'm new to this approach.
Thanks,
Art
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I
From: Lee Lockwood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is there any way to install Vuescan as a plug-in to Photoshop 6???
Not that I know of. It's a standalone.
Second question: If so, is it worth doing?
Even if it were possible, there wouldn't be much point: it'll open any photo
editor you tell it to on
David J. Littleboy wrote:
From: Lee Lockwood [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Is there any way to install Vuescan as a plug-in to Photoshop 6???
Not that I know of. It's a standalone.
Second question: If so, is it worth doing?
Even if it were possible, there wouldn't be much point: it'll open any
Lee writes ...
Is there any way to install Vuescan as a plug-in to Photoshop 6???
No ...
Second question: If so, is it worth doing?
Given that Vs will open the image into your pixel editer automatically, the
only practical difference between a twain plugin and Vs, is that Vs saves
the
Try this:
You can report a problem or make a suggestion for improving VueScan by
sending e-mail to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of VueScan Problem
Report or VueScan Suggestion.
- Original Message -
From: M. Denis Hill [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Sunday, April 21,
I ramble ... the setting you want is on the 'prefs' tab, set the value
refresh delay to '0' seconds ... and your changes will now wait for you
to hit the 'refresh' button.
Yes, that did it! Thanks!
Regards,
Henry Richardson
http://www.hrich.com
Mikael,
Read the instructions?! What are you, a crazy person? Since when did
anyone read software instructions?
Umm, it works very well now, thank you...
Jeremy Nicholl
From: Jeremy Nicholl [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [filmscanners]
.
- Original Message -
From: Tomek Zakrzewski [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2002 5:00 PM
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: VueScan FIY (was: Polaroid's future)
Laurie Solomon wrote:
So why are you quoting me? My quoted post deal with Dave Hemingway
snip
Laurie, I think you're being massively over-sensitive about this. I read
your and Tomek's post, and it was absolutely clear that Tomek was making
a comparison. If you read the post again you'll see that you wrote:
I sincerely hope that David will stay subscribed
to the list and remain
Am I the only one who's happy with NikonScan? It crashed
once on me. Sometime last year, I think.
It's not the crashing in NS that's the problem for me. NS has never
actually crashed on me, even before I upgraded to 3.12.
The reason I like VS so much more than NS is because the scans VS
Message -
From: Op's [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 14, 2002 1:53 AM
Subject: [filmscanners] Re: VueScan FIY (was: Polaroid's
future)
Les Berkley wrote:
To repeat, VueScan DOES have a manual. Not a great one,
but hey, someone
tell me about a great software manual
1 - 100 of 263 matches
Mail list logo
