Maris V. Lidaka, Sr. [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Qualification first - I don't know for a fact that only colors strictly
within the sRGB gamut can be displayed, but that is generally the case.
According to what I've read on the Epson list, sRGB was a gamut designed
around an average computer
on the web.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2001 8:27 AM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: Does CMM work on Win2000?
[snipped]
| In the absence of expensive hardware and software to accurately profile my
PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2001 10:59 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: Does CMM work on Win2000?
Yes, for the web. But what about for print? My understanding is that
colors outside of the sRGB gamut are printable, primarily cyans.
My method, then, is to use Adobe or Bruce RGB
Steve,
You are correct and I will change my ways.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: Steve Greenbank [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, June 28, 2001 5:12 PM
Subject: Re: filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: Does CMM work on Win2000?
| Surely you should archive
in that color space are not viewable onscreen.
Maris
- Original Message -
From: Rob Geraghty [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 26, 2001 9:37 PM
Subject: filmscanners: Re: filmscanners: Does CMM work on Win2000?
| Maris wrote:
| I apologize - my message was wrong
Maris wrote:
I apologize - my message was wrong in a basic respect. The
monitor profile screen will not change the color space
viewed by Windows - that is set by Windows itself to be sRGB.
It will change how the monitor shows the sRGB color space
colors on-screen.
If this is the case, how
Ramesh wrote:
But my image is tagged as ProPhotoRGB. I think, before interpreting
as sRGB, windows is supposed to do some gamut mapping from
ProPhotoRGB to sRGB.
The tag is only used if the software is aware of it. Windows ignores embedded
profiles AFAIK. As I think Maris suggested, you'd
